東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"War on Terrorism, 2001-" ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Framing the Iraq War endgame = war's...

King, Erika G.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Framing the Iraq War endgame = war's denouement in an age of terror /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Framing the Iraq War endgame/ Erika G. King and Robert A. Wells.
其他題名:	war's denouement in an age of terror /
作者:	King, Erika G.
其他作者:	Wells, Robert A.
出版者:	New York :Palgrave-Macmillan, : c2009.,
面頁冊數:	278 p. ;22 cm.
內容註:	Dominating the Public War Discourse -- Challenging Bush's Why We Fight Narrative -- Sounding an Official Warning Bell on Mounting Terrorismand Civil War -- Crafting reactions to the Midterm Elections and the Iraq Study Group Report -- Interpreting the Consequences of the Troop Surge -- Spinning and Debating the Petraeus/Crocker Report -- Bush's Endgame Narrative.
標題:	Iraq War, 2003- -
電子資源:	http://link.springer.com/10.1057/9780230100756access to fulltext (Palgrave)
ISBN:	0230100759

Framing the Iraq War endgame = war's denouement in an age of terror /
King, Erika G.

Framing the Iraq War endgamewar's denouement in an age of terror /[electronic resource] :Erika G. King and Robert A. Wells. - New York :Palgrave-Macmillan,c2009. - 278 p. ;22 cm.

Includes bibliographical references (p. [237]-263) and index.

Dominating the Public War Discourse -- Challenging Bush's Why We Fight Narrative -- Sounding an Official Warning Bell on Mounting Terrorismand Civil War -- Crafting reactions to the Midterm Elections and the Iraq Study Group Report -- Interpreting the Consequences of the Troop Surge -- Spinning and Debating the Petraeus/Crocker Report -- Bush's Endgame Narrative.

The Bush administration was remarkably successful in dominating the debate over why we had togo to war with Iraq, but it would soon be faced with the more daunting task of winning the monumental rhetorical struggle over how to write the script of the Iraq War endgame. We examine the twists and turns of the discursive battle over the war's denouementas it played out against the backdrop of the war on terror, and we conclude that while Bush failed to win the argument that Iraq was one withour fight against terrorism, his underlying worldview that we must confront terrorist evil through global military engagement remains an important component of Obama adminstration rhetoric.

Electronic reproduction.
Basingstoke, England :
Palgrave Macmillan,
2010.

Mode of access:World Wide Web.

ISBN: 0230100759

Standard No.: 10.1057/9780230100756doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

587064
Iraq War, 2003-
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

LC Class. No.: DS79.76 / .K548 2009

Dewey Class. No.: 956.7044/3

Framing the Iraq War endgame = war's denouement in an age of terror /
LDR:02260nmm 2200313 a 45 001 912086
003 OCoLC
005 20110114
006 m d
007 cr cn|
008 231227s2009 nyu sb 001 0 eng d
020 $a 0230100759
020 $a 9780230100756
024 7 $a 10.1057/9780230100756 $2 doi
035 $a (OCoLC)497763938
035 $a ocn497763938
035 $a 912086
040 $a UKPGM $b eng $c UKPGM
043 $a a-iq--- $a n-us---
049 $a APTA
050 1 4 $a DS79.76 $b .K548 2009
082 0 4 $a 956.7044/3 $2 22
100 1 $a King, Erika G. $3 1099648
245 1 0 $a Framing the Iraq War endgame $h [electronic resource] : $b war's denouement in an age of terror / $c Erika G. King and Robert A. Wells.
260 $a New York : $c c2009. $b Palgrave-Macmillan,
300 $a 278 p. ; $c 22 cm.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references (p. [237]-263) and index.
505 0 $a Dominating the Public War Discourse -- Challenging Bush's Why We Fight Narrative -- Sounding an Official Warning Bell on Mounting Terrorismand Civil War -- Crafting reactions to the Midterm Elections and the Iraq Study Group Report -- Interpreting the Consequences of the Troop Surge -- Spinning and Debating the Petraeus/Crocker Report -- Bush's Endgame Narrative.
520 $a The Bush administration was remarkably successful in dominating the debate over why we had togo to war with Iraq, but it would soon be faced with the more daunting task of winning the monumental rhetorical struggle over how to write the script of the Iraq War endgame. We examine the twists and turns of the discursive battle over the war's denouementas it played out against the backdrop of the war on terror, and we conclude that while Bush failed to win the argument that Iraq was one withour fight against terrorism, his underlying worldview that we must confront terrorist evil through global military engagement remains an important component of Obama adminstration rhetoric.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Basingstoke, England : $c Palgrave Macmillan, $d 2010. $n Mode of access:World Wide Web. $n System requirements: Web browser. $n Title from title screen (viewed on Jan. 11, 2010). $n Access may be restricted to users at subscribing institutions.
650 0 $a Iraq War, 2003- $3 587064
650 0 $a War on Terrorism, 2001- $3 545119
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
700 1 $a Wells, Robert A. $3 1099647
710 2 $a Palgrave Connect (Online service) $3 1081578
856 4 0 $3 Palgrave Connect $u http://link.springer.com/10.1057/9780230100756 $z access to fulltext (Palgrave)