東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Social work." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Toward a new understanding of intima...

Mennicke, Annelise Mae Shearer.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Toward a new understanding of intimate partner violence: Exploring typology-, gender-, and racially-inclusive dynamics.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Toward a new understanding of intimate partner violence: Exploring typology-, gender-, and racially-inclusive dynamics./
作者:	Mennicke, Annelise Mae Shearer.
面頁冊數:	201 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-10A(E).
標題:	Social work. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3705880
ISBN:	9781321792652

Toward a new understanding of intimate partner violence: Exploring typology-, gender-, and racially-inclusive dynamics.
Mennicke, Annelise Mae Shearer.

Toward a new understanding of intimate partner violence: Exploring typology-, gender-, and racially-inclusive dynamics. - 201 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2015.

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is estimated to affect over 1.3 million women a year and costs society more than $5.8 billion annually (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2003). Extensive evidence indicates that men and women perpetrate IPV at similar rates (Fiebert, 2010) and a large portion of IPV involves perpetration by both partners in a couple unit (Kessler, Molnar, Feurer, & Appelbaum, 2001). These findings have created a contentious debate among researchers about the nature of IPV and utility of gender in understanding its dynamics. Family conflict theorists contend that IPV is used as an outgrowth of conflict and that societal and family characteristics explain the high rates of IPV perpetration for men and women (Fiebert & Gonzalez, 1997, Straus, 2010). Meanwhile, feminist theorists focus on the role that control plays in understanding violence and how control intersects with gender to create a culture of terror (Stark, 2007) and contend that methodological issues account for the high prevalence of gender symmetry (Kelly & Johnson, 2008). A typology of IPV, which assumes that violence is not used in intimate relationships for one static reason, asserts that there are different categories of IPV that occur within intimate partner relationships and failure to specify the category of IPV being explored has led to confusing and uninterpretable empirical findings regarding the rates of IPV and gender (Kelly & Johnson, 2008). The purpose of this research was to bridge these theories by advancing the typology of IPV perspective using a gender and racially robust sample and identifying the correlates and consequences of each category.

ISBN: 9781321792652Subjects--Topical Terms:

644197
Social work.

Toward a new understanding of intimate partner violence: Exploring typology-, gender-, and racially-inclusive dynamics.
LDR:05829nmm a2200301 4500 001 2068557
005 20160422121611.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321792652
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3705880
035 $a AAI3705880
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Mennicke, Annelise Mae Shearer. $3 3183506
245 1 0 $a Toward a new understanding of intimate partner violence: Exploring typology-, gender-, and racially-inclusive dynamics.
300 $a 201 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Dina J. Wilke.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2015.
520 $a Intimate partner violence (IPV) is estimated to affect over 1.3 million women a year and costs society more than $5.8 billion annually (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2003). Extensive evidence indicates that men and women perpetrate IPV at similar rates (Fiebert, 2010) and a large portion of IPV involves perpetration by both partners in a couple unit (Kessler, Molnar, Feurer, & Appelbaum, 2001). These findings have created a contentious debate among researchers about the nature of IPV and utility of gender in understanding its dynamics. Family conflict theorists contend that IPV is used as an outgrowth of conflict and that societal and family characteristics explain the high rates of IPV perpetration for men and women (Fiebert & Gonzalez, 1997, Straus, 2010). Meanwhile, feminist theorists focus on the role that control plays in understanding violence and how control intersects with gender to create a culture of terror (Stark, 2007) and contend that methodological issues account for the high prevalence of gender symmetry (Kelly & Johnson, 2008). A typology of IPV, which assumes that violence is not used in intimate relationships for one static reason, asserts that there are different categories of IPV that occur within intimate partner relationships and failure to specify the category of IPV being explored has led to confusing and uninterpretable empirical findings regarding the rates of IPV and gender (Kelly & Johnson, 2008). The purpose of this research was to bridge these theories by advancing the typology of IPV perspective using a gender and racially robust sample and identifying the correlates and consequences of each category.
520 $a This research tested a theory of IPV at the relationship level, conceptualizing categories of IPV as occurring from the interaction of individual behavior within a relationship, forming 10 unique categories. An analysis of secondary data was used; the data were originally collected by Dutton, Goodman, and Schmidt (2006) to develop and validate a measure of nonviolent coercive control under a project entitled "Development and Validation of a Coercive Control Measure for Intimate Partner Violence", which was funded by the National Institute of Justice (Award number 2001-WT-BX-0503). The original sample consisted of 757 participants who were recruited from several locations, which was reduced to 714 participants through data cleaning procedures. Individuals completed a survey which included questions about their own perpetration of violence and control, victimization by violence and control, levels of social/relationship related constructs, mental health related outcomes, and demographic characteristics.
520 $a Cluster analyses, chi-square tests of independence, multinomial logistic regressions, and multigroup path analyses were used to test the hypotheses. Cluster analyses indicated that elements of IPV (control perpetration, control victimization, violence victimization and violence perpetration) all clustered in a high/low pattern, which intersected to form six unique categories of IPV in addition to the no-IPV category. Chi-square tests of independence indicated that distributions of these categories of IPV were dependent on gender but independent of race. A multinomial logistic regression found that each category of IPV was predicted by a unique combination of demographic and social/relationship variables, and interactions between race, gender, and socioeconomic status to account for intersectionality theory were not useful in the retained model. Finally, a multigroup path analysis revealed that levels of PTSD and depression were higher for individuals in relationships with IPV than without IPV.
520 $a This research provides empirical support that IPV as previously described and identified by two seemingly competing theoretical orientations exists simultaneously. Support for the FCTs perspective was found because the majority of violence that existed in relationships was bidirectional, suggesting an association with conflict. Several categories of IPV were control-related, in line with feminist theories; most notably a unique category of intimate terrorism was affirmed that could not be explained by any demographic characteristics. This research found support for all four categories of IPV identified under Johnson's (2008) typology of IPV, but also found the presence of two control-related categories: situational control and control resistance. Interpreted cautiously in lieu of the limitations of the study, this new typology of IPV provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the range of violent and controlling experiences within relationships, and gives social workers a common language to describe the variety of IPV present within their client systems which can be used to guide the development and implementation of more responsive treatment modalities.
590 $a School code: 0071.
650 4 $a Social work. $3 644197
690 $a 0452
710 2 $a The Florida State University. $b Social Work. $3 3170320
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-10A(E).
790 $a 0071
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3705880