語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
到查詢結果
[ subject:"Religion, General." ]
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
The individual and the ethics of war...
~
Perabo, Betsy Chase.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
The individual and the ethics of war: Christian and American interpretations of the jus in bello.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
The individual and the ethics of war: Christian and American interpretations of the jus in bello./
作者:
Perabo, Betsy Chase.
面頁冊數:
263 p.
附註:
Directors: Margaret A. Farley; Bruce M. Russett.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International66-03A.
標題:
Religion, General. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3168967
ISBN:
9780542049545
The individual and the ethics of war: Christian and American interpretations of the jus in bello.
Perabo, Betsy Chase.
The individual and the ethics of war: Christian and American interpretations of the jus in bello.
- 263 p.
Directors: Margaret A. Farley; Bruce M. Russett.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Yale University, 2005.
This dissertation expands and reconstructs the just war category of jus in bello, which addresses the way in which war is conducted. It first argues that an analysis of the jus in bello must encompass not only what occurs during war, but also what a nation does because it anticipates that, as a matter of course, it will fight wars. Specifically, a nation must evaluate the principles underlying the formation and operation of its military: who enters the military, how these individuals are trained, and more generally, how the relationship between the soldier and the military is understood. Both Christian and American perspectives on these questions are addressed. This expansion of jus in bello is necessary not only because this process is important in itself, but because it is likely to affect how the nation's soldiers and general population understand the combatant/noncombatant distinction.
ISBN: 9780542049545Subjects--Topical Terms:
1017453
Religion, General.
The individual and the ethics of war: Christian and American interpretations of the jus in bello.
LDR
:03070nam 2200289 a 45
001
962561
005
20110830
008
110831s2005 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9780542049545
035
$a
(UMI)AAI3168967
035
$a
AAI3168967
040
$a
UMI
$c
UMI
100
1
$a
Perabo, Betsy Chase.
$3
1285622
245
1 4
$a
The individual and the ethics of war: Christian and American interpretations of the jus in bello.
300
$a
263 p.
500
$a
Directors: Margaret A. Farley; Bruce M. Russett.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-03, Section: A, page: 1033.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Yale University, 2005.
520
$a
This dissertation expands and reconstructs the just war category of jus in bello, which addresses the way in which war is conducted. It first argues that an analysis of the jus in bello must encompass not only what occurs during war, but also what a nation does because it anticipates that, as a matter of course, it will fight wars. Specifically, a nation must evaluate the principles underlying the formation and operation of its military: who enters the military, how these individuals are trained, and more generally, how the relationship between the soldier and the military is understood. Both Christian and American perspectives on these questions are addressed. This expansion of jus in bello is necessary not only because this process is important in itself, but because it is likely to affect how the nation's soldiers and general population understand the combatant/noncombatant distinction.
520
$a
The fluid boundary between combatant and noncombatant, highlighted by the complex treatment of the soldier, generates in turn a need for a more complex understanding of the principle of discrimination, one of the two central categories of the jus in bello. After examining both historical and contemporary discussions of the principle, as well as U.S. military policy, the dissertation sets forth a revised formulation of the principle of discrimination based on three criteria: action, status, and guilt. This formulation suggests that efforts should be made to tailor the treatment of individuals based on the actions they take, their formal status as soldier or civilian, and their guilt or innocence with respect to the prosecution or initiation of the war. Finally, the dissertation considers how such a formulation might be implemented by considering the harms and benefits associated with several classes of weapons. It concludes that the U.S. would be well-served by access to a variety of different types of weapons, including non-lethal weapons currently under development, but that it must be aware of the moral problems that might accompany the incorporation of these weapons into its arsenal.
590
$a
School code: 0265.
650
4
$a
Religion, General.
$3
1017453
690
$a
0318
710
2
$a
Yale University.
$3
515640
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
66-03A.
790
$a
0265
790
1 0
$a
Farley, Margaret A.,
$e
advisor
790
1 0
$a
Russett, Bruce M.,
$e
advisor
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2005
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3168967
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9122917
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB W9122917
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入