東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Recidivism." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Risk assessment = origins, evolution...

Shapiro, David L.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Risk assessment = origins, evolution, and implications for practice /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Risk assessment/ by David L. Shapiro, Angela M. Noe.
其他題名:	origins, evolution, and implications for practice /
作者:	Shapiro, David L.
其他作者:	Noe, Angela M.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2015.,
面頁冊數:	x, 61 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	Chapter 1: Origins -- The MacArthur Foundation Research on Risk Assessment -- The Supposed Roles of Mental Illness -- Case Example -- Predicting Sexual Re-Offending -- Chapter 2: Assessment Instruments -- Psychopathology Checklist - Revised (PCL-R) -- Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) -- Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG) -- Domestic Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (DVRAG) -- Static-99 -- Rapid Risk Assessment for Sex Offender Recidivism (RRASOR) -- Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool - Revised (MnSOST-R) -- Structured Professional Judgement -- Historical, Clinical, Risk Management - 20 (HCR-20) -- Sexual Violence Risk - 20 (SVR-20) -- Spousal Assault Risk Appraisal Guide (SARA) -- Observations and Limitations -- Chapter 3: Clinical Practice.- Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California (1976)- McIntosh v. Milano (1979)- Shaw v. Glickman (1980)- Thompson v. Alameda County (1979)- Hedlund v. The Superior Court of Orange County (1983)- Brady v. Hopper (1983)- Davis v. Lhim (1983)- Peck v. Counseling Services of Addison County (1985)- White v. United States (1986)- Currie v. United States (1986)- Nasser v. Parker (1995)- Sage v. United States (1997)- Jablonski v. United States (1983)- Lipari v. Sears, Roebuck (1980)- Williamson v. Liptzin (2000)- Ewing v. Goldstein (2004) -- Chapter 4: Conclusions.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Recidivism. -
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17058-9
ISBN:	9783319170589 (electronic bk.)

Risk assessment = origins, evolution, and implications for practice /
Shapiro, David L.

Risk assessmentorigins, evolution, and implications for practice /[electronic resource] :by David L. Shapiro, Angela M. Noe. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2015. - x, 61 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - SpringerBriefs in psychology. Behavioral criminology,2192-8363. - SpringerBriefs in psychology.Behavioral criminology..

Chapter 1: Origins -- The MacArthur Foundation Research on Risk Assessment -- The Supposed Roles of Mental Illness -- Case Example -- Predicting Sexual Re-Offending -- Chapter 2: Assessment Instruments -- Psychopathology Checklist - Revised (PCL-R) -- Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) -- Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG) -- Domestic Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (DVRAG) -- Static-99 -- Rapid Risk Assessment for Sex Offender Recidivism (RRASOR) -- Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool - Revised (MnSOST-R) -- Structured Professional Judgement -- Historical, Clinical, Risk Management - 20 (HCR-20) -- Sexual Violence Risk - 20 (SVR-20) -- Spousal Assault Risk Appraisal Guide (SARA) -- Observations and Limitations -- Chapter 3: Clinical Practice.- Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California (1976)- McIntosh v. Milano (1979)- Shaw v. Glickman (1980)- Thompson v. Alameda County (1979)- Hedlund v. The Superior Court of Orange County (1983)- Brady v. Hopper (1983)- Davis v. Lhim (1983)- Peck v. Counseling Services of Addison County (1985)- White v. United States (1986)- Currie v. United States (1986)- Nasser v. Parker (1995)- Sage v. United States (1997)- Jablonski v. United States (1983)- Lipari v. Sears, Roebuck (1980)- Williamson v. Liptzin (2000)- Ewing v. Goldstein (2004) -- Chapter 4: Conclusions.

This compact reference makes the case for a middle ground between clinical and actuarial methods in predicting future violence, domestic violence, and sexual offending. It critiques widely used measures such as the PCL-R, VRAG, SORAG, and Static-99 in terms of clarity of scoring, need for clinical interpretation, and potential weight in assessing individuals. Appropriate standards of practice are illustrated--and questioned--based on significant legal cases, among them Tarasoff v.Regents of the State of California and Lipari v. Sears, that have long defined the field. This expert coverage helps make sense of the pertinent issues and controversies surrounding risk assessment as it provides readers with invaluable information in these and other key areas: The history of violence prediction. Commonly used assessment instruments with their strengths and limitations. Psychological risk factors, both actual and questionable. Clinical lessons learned from instructive court cases, from Tarasoff forward. Implications for treatment providers. How more specialized risk assessment measures may be developed. Risk Assessment offers its readers--professionals working with sex offenders as well as those working with the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide and Sex Offender Appraisal Guide--new possibilities for rethinking the assessment strategies of their trade toward predicting and preventing violent criminal incidents.

ISBN: 9783319170589 (electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-17058-9doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1458367
Recidivism.

LC Class. No.: HV6049

Dewey Class. No.: 364.3

Risk assessment = origins, evolution, and implications for practice /
LDR:03832nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 1997681
003 DE-He213
005 20151006112054.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 151112s2015 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319170589 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319170572 (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-17058-9 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-17058-9
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a HV6049
072 7 $a MMJT $2 bicssc
072 7 $a MQU $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PSY028000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 364.3 $2 23
090 $a HV6049 $b .S529 2015
100 1 $a Shapiro, David L. $3 2138967
245 1 0 $a Risk assessment $h [electronic resource] : $b origins, evolution, and implications for practice / $c by David L. Shapiro, Angela M. Noe.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2015.
300 $a x, 61 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a SpringerBriefs in psychology. Behavioral criminology, $x 2192-8363
505 0 $a Chapter 1: Origins -- The MacArthur Foundation Research on Risk Assessment -- The Supposed Roles of Mental Illness -- Case Example -- Predicting Sexual Re-Offending -- Chapter 2: Assessment Instruments -- Psychopathology Checklist - Revised (PCL-R) -- Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) -- Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG) -- Domestic Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (DVRAG) -- Static-99 -- Rapid Risk Assessment for Sex Offender Recidivism (RRASOR) -- Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool - Revised (MnSOST-R) -- Structured Professional Judgement -- Historical, Clinical, Risk Management - 20 (HCR-20) -- Sexual Violence Risk - 20 (SVR-20) -- Spousal Assault Risk Appraisal Guide (SARA) -- Observations and Limitations -- Chapter 3: Clinical Practice.- Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California (1976)- McIntosh v. Milano (1979)- Shaw v. Glickman (1980)- Thompson v. Alameda County (1979)- Hedlund v. The Superior Court of Orange County (1983)- Brady v. Hopper (1983)- Davis v. Lhim (1983)- Peck v. Counseling Services of Addison County (1985)- White v. United States (1986)- Currie v. United States (1986)- Nasser v. Parker (1995)- Sage v. United States (1997)- Jablonski v. United States (1983)- Lipari v. Sears, Roebuck (1980)- Williamson v. Liptzin (2000)- Ewing v. Goldstein (2004) -- Chapter 4: Conclusions.
520 $a This compact reference makes the case for a middle ground between clinical and actuarial methods in predicting future violence, domestic violence, and sexual offending. It critiques widely used measures such as the PCL-R, VRAG, SORAG, and Static-99 in terms of clarity of scoring, need for clinical interpretation, and potential weight in assessing individuals. Appropriate standards of practice are illustrated--and questioned--based on significant legal cases, among them Tarasoff v.Regents of the State of California and Lipari v. Sears, that have long defined the field. This expert coverage helps make sense of the pertinent issues and controversies surrounding risk assessment as it provides readers with invaluable information in these and other key areas: The history of violence prediction. Commonly used assessment instruments with their strengths and limitations. Psychological risk factors, both actual and questionable. Clinical lessons learned from instructive court cases, from Tarasoff forward. Implications for treatment providers. How more specialized risk assessment measures may be developed. Risk Assessment offers its readers--professionals working with sex offenders as well as those working with the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide and Sex Offender Appraisal Guide--new possibilities for rethinking the assessment strategies of their trade toward predicting and preventing violent criminal incidents.
650 0 $a Recidivism. $3 1458367
650 0 $a Risk assessment. $3 543512
650 0 $a Crime prevention. $3 535813
650 1 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 2 4 $a Psychotherapy and Counseling. $3 928052
650 2 4 $a Criminology & Criminal Justice. $3 894946
700 1 $a Noe, Angela M. $3 2138968
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a SpringerBriefs in psychology. $p Behavioral criminology. $3 2130837
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17058-9
950 $a Behavioral Science (Springer-11640)