東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ author_sort:"reach, gerard." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Clinical inertia = a critique of med...

Reach, Gerard.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Clinical inertia = a critique of medical reason /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Clinical inertia/ by Gerard Reach.
其他題名:	a critique of medical reason /
作者:	Reach, Gerard.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2015.,
面頁冊數:	xxii, 142 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	Introduction -- Definitions -- The Evidence: The Gap Between Clinical Guidelines and Reality -- Determinants and Explanatory Models of Clinical Inertia -- The Doctor and Evidence-Based Medicine -- To Do or Not to Do: A Critique of Medical Reason -- Fighting Against True Clinical Inertia -- Conclusion: Time for Medical Reason -- References.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Medical logic. -
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09882-1
ISBN:	9783319098821 (electronic bk.)

Clinical inertia = a critique of medical reason /
Reach, Gerard.

Clinical inertiaa critique of medical reason /[electronic resource] :by Gerard Reach. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2015. - xxii, 142 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Introduction -- Definitions -- The Evidence: The Gap Between Clinical Guidelines and Reality -- Determinants and Explanatory Models of Clinical Inertia -- The Doctor and Evidence-Based Medicine -- To Do or Not to Do: A Critique of Medical Reason -- Fighting Against True Clinical Inertia -- Conclusion: Time for Medical Reason -- References.

Clinical practice guidelines were initially developed within the context of evidence-based medicine with the goal of putting medical research findings into practice. However, physicians do not always follow them, even when they seem to apply to the particular patient they have to treat. This phenomenon, known as clinical inertia, represents a significant obstacle to the efficiency of care and a major public health problem, the extent of which is demonstrated in this book. An analysis of its causes shows that it stems from a discrepancy between the objective, essentially statistical nature of evidence-based medicine on the one hand and the physician's own complex, subjective view (referred to here as medical reason) on the other. This book proposes a critique of medical reason that may help to reconcile the principles of evidence-based medicine and individual practice. The author is a diabetologist and Professor of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolic Diseases at Paris 13 University. He has authored several books, including one to be published by Springer (Philosophy and Medicine series) under the title: The Mental Mechanisms of Patient Adherence to Long Term Therapies, Mind and Care.

ISBN: 9783319098821 (electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-09882-1doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

785697
Medical logic.

LC Class. No.: R723

Dewey Class. No.: 610.1

Clinical inertia = a critique of medical reason /
LDR:02496nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 1993838
003 DE-He213
005 20150723163529.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 151019s2015 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319098821 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319098814 (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-09882-1 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-09882-1
040 $a GP $c GP
041 1 $a eng $h fre
050 4 $a R723
072 7 $a MB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a MED000000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 610.1 $2 23
090 $a R723 $b .R281 2015
100 1 $a Reach, Gerard. $3 2132339
240 1 0 $a Intertie clinique. $l English
245 1 0 $a Clinical inertia $h [electronic resource] : $b a critique of medical reason / $c by Gerard Reach.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2015.
300 $a xxii, 142 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Introduction -- Definitions -- The Evidence: The Gap Between Clinical Guidelines and Reality -- Determinants and Explanatory Models of Clinical Inertia -- The Doctor and Evidence-Based Medicine -- To Do or Not to Do: A Critique of Medical Reason -- Fighting Against True Clinical Inertia -- Conclusion: Time for Medical Reason -- References.
520 $a Clinical practice guidelines were initially developed within the context of evidence-based medicine with the goal of putting medical research findings into practice. However, physicians do not always follow them, even when they seem to apply to the particular patient they have to treat. This phenomenon, known as clinical inertia, represents a significant obstacle to the efficiency of care and a major public health problem, the extent of which is demonstrated in this book. An analysis of its causes shows that it stems from a discrepancy between the objective, essentially statistical nature of evidence-based medicine on the one hand and the physician's own complex, subjective view (referred to here as medical reason) on the other. This book proposes a critique of medical reason that may help to reconcile the principles of evidence-based medicine and individual practice. The author is a diabetologist and Professor of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolic Diseases at Paris 13 University. He has authored several books, including one to be published by Springer (Philosophy and Medicine series) under the title: The Mental Mechanisms of Patient Adherence to Long Term Therapies, Mind and Care.
650 0 $a Medical logic. $3 785697
650 0 $a Medicine $x Philosophy. $3 550036
650 0 $a Medical ethics. $3 526828
650 1 4 $a Medicine & Public Health. $3 890906
650 2 4 $a Medicine/Public Health, general. $3 891342
650 2 4 $a Public Health. $3 624351
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Medicine. $3 894449
650 2 4 $a Quality of Life Research. $3 897157
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09882-1
950 $a Medicine (Springer-11650)