東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Organization Theory." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

You Can't Always Get What You Want: ...

Fusi, Federica.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

You Can't Always Get What You Want: Data Access in US Small and Medium Sized Cities.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	You Can't Always Get What You Want: Data Access in US Small and Medium Sized Cities./
作者:	Fusi, Federica.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	242 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-06, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-06A.
標題:	Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10981681
ISBN:	9780438714854

You Can't Always Get What You Want: Data Access in US Small and Medium Sized Cities.
Fusi, Federica.

You Can't Always Get What You Want: Data Access in US Small and Medium Sized Cities. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 242 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-06, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2018.

This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.

This research examines data exchange between city departments and external stakeholders; particularly, why city departments have different capacity to access data from departments in the same city, other public agencies, private and nonprofit organizations. Data access is of theoretical interest because it provides the opportunity to investigate how public organizations and public managers deal with a portfolio of relationships in a loosely structured context characterized by dynamics of power and influence. Moreover, enhancing data access is important for public managers to increase the amount and diversity of information available to design, implement, and support public services and policies. Drawing from institutionalism, resource dependence theory, and collaboration scholarship, I developed a set of hypotheses that emphasize two dimensions of data access in local governments. First, a vertical dimension which includes institutions, the social environment - particularly power relationships - and coordination mechanisms implemented by managers. This dimension shows how exogenous - not controlled by public managers - and endogenous - controlled by public managers - factors contribute to a public organization's ability to access resources. Second, a horizontal dimension which considers the characteristics of the actors involved in data exchange and emphasizes the institutional and social context of intra-organizational, intra-sectoral and cross-sectoral data access. Hypotheses are tested using survey data from a 2016 nationally representative sample of 500 US cities with populations between 25,000 and 250,000. By focusing on small- and medium-sized cities, I contribute to a literature that typically focuses on data sharing in US large cities and federal agencies. Results show that the influence of government agencies and the influence of civil society have opposite effect on data access, whereas government influence limits data access while influence from civil society increases capacity to access data. The effectiveness of coordination mechanisms varies according to the stakeholder type. Public managers rely on informal networks to exchange data with other departments in the city and other governmental agencies while they leverage lateral coordination mechanisms - informal but unplanned - to coordinate data access from nongovernmental organizations. I conclude by discussing the implications for practice and future research.

ISBN: 9780438714854Subjects--Topical Terms:

516664
Management.

You Can't Always Get What You Want: Data Access in US Small and Medium Sized Cities.
LDR:03649nmm a2200349 4500 001 2209535
005 20191105130505.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438714854
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10981681
035 $a (MiAaPQ)asu:18533
035 $a AAI10981681
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Fusi, Federica. $3 3436624
245 1 0 $a You Can't Always Get What You Want: Data Access in US Small and Medium Sized Cities.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 242 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-06, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Feeney, Mary K.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This research examines data exchange between city departments and external stakeholders; particularly, why city departments have different capacity to access data from departments in the same city, other public agencies, private and nonprofit organizations. Data access is of theoretical interest because it provides the opportunity to investigate how public organizations and public managers deal with a portfolio of relationships in a loosely structured context characterized by dynamics of power and influence. Moreover, enhancing data access is important for public managers to increase the amount and diversity of information available to design, implement, and support public services and policies. Drawing from institutionalism, resource dependence theory, and collaboration scholarship, I developed a set of hypotheses that emphasize two dimensions of data access in local governments. First, a vertical dimension which includes institutions, the social environment - particularly power relationships - and coordination mechanisms implemented by managers. This dimension shows how exogenous - not controlled by public managers - and endogenous - controlled by public managers - factors contribute to a public organization's ability to access resources. Second, a horizontal dimension which considers the characteristics of the actors involved in data exchange and emphasizes the institutional and social context of intra-organizational, intra-sectoral and cross-sectoral data access. Hypotheses are tested using survey data from a 2016 nationally representative sample of 500 US cities with populations between 25,000 and 250,000. By focusing on small- and medium-sized cities, I contribute to a literature that typically focuses on data sharing in US large cities and federal agencies. Results show that the influence of government agencies and the influence of civil society have opposite effect on data access, whereas government influence limits data access while influence from civil society increases capacity to access data. The effectiveness of coordination mechanisms varies according to the stakeholder type. Public managers rely on informal networks to exchange data with other departments in the city and other governmental agencies while they leverage lateral coordination mechanisms - informal but unplanned - to coordinate data access from nongovernmental organizations. I conclude by discussing the implications for practice and future research.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Management. $3 516664
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 531287
650 4 $a Organization Theory. $3 3432359
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0635
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Public Administration and Policy. $3 3351729
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-06A.
790 $a 0010
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10981681