語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
到查詢結果
[ subject:"Medical Ethics." ]
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
An Ethical Model for Mandatory Repor...
~
Molchan, Kate A.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
An Ethical Model for Mandatory Reporting to Avoid Preventable Adverse Harm in Health Care.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
An Ethical Model for Mandatory Reporting to Avoid Preventable Adverse Harm in Health Care./
作者:
Molchan, Kate A.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:
315 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07, Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International80-07B.
標題:
Law. -
電子資源:
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10978834
ISBN:
9780438792395
An Ethical Model for Mandatory Reporting to Avoid Preventable Adverse Harm in Health Care.
Molchan, Kate A.
An Ethical Model for Mandatory Reporting to Avoid Preventable Adverse Harm in Health Care.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 315 p.
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07, Section: B.
Thesis (D.H.C.E.)--Duquesne University, 2018.
This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
The goal of the dissertation is to undertake an analysis in healthcare ethics that focuses upon organizational ethics to resolve problems related to medical error in the U.S. The ethical argument focuses upon justifying a model of mandatory reporting nationally. While countless others have argued in favor of the implementation of a mandatory reporting system, this dissertation presents its model through the lens of organizational theory; arguing first that healthcare organizations are ethically required to invest in patient safety. This premise frames the foundation for this dissertation's central argument; namely, that U.S. healthcare organizations have an ethical imperative to protect the public from undue harm. Only after having established this normative foundation does this dissertation address the primary obstacle to improving patient safety (the current culture of medicine) and offer suggestions for how to begin to build a business case to incentivize decisive action to develop a culture of safety. The ethical argument explores the justification for developing a centralized, mandatory, non-punitive reporting system that can collect and disseminate adverse event information to a national audience. The analysis relates two foundational concepts to advance this argument: namely, the system-based approach to patient safety and institutional moral agency. The discussion of the systems-based approach to patient safety informs the stance that healthcare organizations are uniquely situated to intervene to reduce medical error. This approach emphasizes the role of system defenses, barriers, and safeguards in preventing errors; recognizing that, because humans are fallible and cannot be made perfect, reform efforts need to focus on system design to prevent harm. The second concept provides a normative framework to hold healthcare organizations morally accountable for failures in system design. Without moral agency, organizations cannot be held accountable for their institutional practices or use of systems. Together, these concepts provide an ethical framework to advocate for greater transparency and the nationwide implementation of a mandatory reporting system for preventable adverse harm.
ISBN: 9780438792395Subjects--Topical Terms:
600858
Law.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Mandatory reporting
An Ethical Model for Mandatory Reporting to Avoid Preventable Adverse Harm in Health Care.
LDR
:03618nmm a2200421 4500
001
2278174
005
20210611091944.5
008
220723s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9780438792395
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10978834
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)duquesne:11160
035
$a
AAI10978834
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Molchan, Kate A.
$3
3556545
245
1 3
$a
An Ethical Model for Mandatory Reporting to Avoid Preventable Adverse Harm in Health Care.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2018
300
$a
315 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07, Section: B.
500
$a
Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500
$a
Advisor: Magill, Gerard.
502
$a
Thesis (D.H.C.E.)--Duquesne University, 2018.
506
$a
This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
The goal of the dissertation is to undertake an analysis in healthcare ethics that focuses upon organizational ethics to resolve problems related to medical error in the U.S. The ethical argument focuses upon justifying a model of mandatory reporting nationally. While countless others have argued in favor of the implementation of a mandatory reporting system, this dissertation presents its model through the lens of organizational theory; arguing first that healthcare organizations are ethically required to invest in patient safety. This premise frames the foundation for this dissertation's central argument; namely, that U.S. healthcare organizations have an ethical imperative to protect the public from undue harm. Only after having established this normative foundation does this dissertation address the primary obstacle to improving patient safety (the current culture of medicine) and offer suggestions for how to begin to build a business case to incentivize decisive action to develop a culture of safety. The ethical argument explores the justification for developing a centralized, mandatory, non-punitive reporting system that can collect and disseminate adverse event information to a national audience. The analysis relates two foundational concepts to advance this argument: namely, the system-based approach to patient safety and institutional moral agency. The discussion of the systems-based approach to patient safety informs the stance that healthcare organizations are uniquely situated to intervene to reduce medical error. This approach emphasizes the role of system defenses, barriers, and safeguards in preventing errors; recognizing that, because humans are fallible and cannot be made perfect, reform efforts need to focus on system design to prevent harm. The second concept provides a normative framework to hold healthcare organizations morally accountable for failures in system design. Without moral agency, organizations cannot be held accountable for their institutional practices or use of systems. Together, these concepts provide an ethical framework to advocate for greater transparency and the nationwide implementation of a mandatory reporting system for preventable adverse harm.
590
$a
School code: 0067.
650
4
$a
Law.
$3
600858
650
4
$a
Medical Ethics.
$3
3541372
650
4
$a
Public health.
$3
534748
650
4
$a
Health care management.
$3
2122906
653
$a
Mandatory reporting
653
$a
Medical error
653
$a
Organizational ethics
653
$a
Patient safety
653
$a
Preventable adverse harm
690
$a
0398
690
$a
0497
690
$a
0573
690
$a
0769
710
2
$a
Duquesne University.
$b
Health Care Ethics.
$3
2092018
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
80-07B.
790
$a
0067
791
$a
D.H.C.E.
792
$a
2018
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10978834
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9429907
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入