東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Linguistics." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Variable Expression of Transitiv...

Sabogal, Andres M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Variable Expression of Transitive Subject and Possessor in Wayuunaiki (Guajiro).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Variable Expression of Transitive Subject and Possessor in Wayuunaiki (Guajiro)./
作者:	Sabogal, Andres M.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	271 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-03A.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10822041
ISBN:	9780438420793

The Variable Expression of Transitive Subject and Possessor in Wayuunaiki (Guajiro).
Sabogal, Andres M.

The Variable Expression of Transitive Subject and Possessor in Wayuunaiki (Guajiro). - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 271 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of New Mexico, 2018.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

In Wayuunaiki, verbal affixes cross-reference clausal arguments in various ways. Most notably, there are two ways to express transitive subjects, and two ways to express possessors. Much like voice alternatives, the variable expression of subject and possessor impart different perspectives on a situation type, but unlike traditional voice categories, syntactic valence remains equal. This dissertation characterizes these constructions with a specific question in mind: what do these two cross-referencing alternations communicate and what influences their usage? To answer these questions, I consider the linguistic properties observed in the usage of these constructions in narratives (Jusayu 1986, 1994), and informal conversations. Mosonyi (1975) describes the Subjective and Objective transitive clauses as focus alternatives. Alvarez (1993) discovered that the O in the Objective clause must be definite. Despite the association of definiteness and focus as a central factors, the usage of the alternatives in discourse has has not received enough attention. I here conclude that the Subjective variant is the pragmatically marked option, whose primary function is to defocus a 3rd person O that is typically inanimate, new and non-topical. This clause type has the effect of retaining its syntactic valency, but expresseing semantically low transitivity. Alvarez (1990) documents possessor ascension as a construction that involves unrestricted noun incorporation. Matera (2001) adds that the possessor of an incorporated noun can only assume the role of transitive object or stative subject. In the present corpus exploration, I conclude that the External Possessor construction is the functionally marked clause, whose function is primarily to defocus a possessed nominal that is typically inalienable, inanimate, and non-topical information. Additionally, whole-part relationships frequently participate in incorporation, while kinship relations do so rarely. These two ways to cross-reference arguments are here interpreted as differential focus assignment on clausal arguments (Dixon & Aikhenvald 1997). They both involve the prefixation of a- referring to the transitive subject and the external possessor. I conclude that in these constructions this prefix has the effect of backgrounding an entity and consequently assigning undivided focus to the subject or the possessor.

ISBN: 9780438420793Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.

The Variable Expression of Transitive Subject and Possessor in Wayuunaiki (Guajiro).
LDR:03507nmm a2200337 4500 001 2210889
005 20191126113851.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438420793
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10822041
035 $a (MiAaPQ)newmex:11986
035 $a AAI10822041
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Sabogal, Andres M. $3 3438035
245 1 4 $a The Variable Expression of Transitive Subject and Possessor in Wayuunaiki (Guajiro).
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 271 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Axelrod, Melissa.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of New Mexico, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a In Wayuunaiki, verbal affixes cross-reference clausal arguments in various ways. Most notably, there are two ways to express transitive subjects, and two ways to express possessors. Much like voice alternatives, the variable expression of subject and possessor impart different perspectives on a situation type, but unlike traditional voice categories, syntactic valence remains equal. This dissertation characterizes these constructions with a specific question in mind: what do these two cross-referencing alternations communicate and what influences their usage? To answer these questions, I consider the linguistic properties observed in the usage of these constructions in narratives (Jusayu 1986, 1994), and informal conversations. Mosonyi (1975) describes the Subjective and Objective transitive clauses as focus alternatives. Alvarez (1993) discovered that the O in the Objective clause must be definite. Despite the association of definiteness and focus as a central factors, the usage of the alternatives in discourse has has not received enough attention. I here conclude that the Subjective variant is the pragmatically marked option, whose primary function is to defocus a 3rd person O that is typically inanimate, new and non-topical. This clause type has the effect of retaining its syntactic valency, but expresseing semantically low transitivity. Alvarez (1990) documents possessor ascension as a construction that involves unrestricted noun incorporation. Matera (2001) adds that the possessor of an incorporated noun can only assume the role of transitive object or stative subject. In the present corpus exploration, I conclude that the External Possessor construction is the functionally marked clause, whose function is primarily to defocus a possessed nominal that is typically inalienable, inanimate, and non-topical information. Additionally, whole-part relationships frequently participate in incorporation, while kinship relations do so rarely. These two ways to cross-reference arguments are here interpreted as differential focus assignment on clausal arguments (Dixon & Aikhenvald 1997). They both involve the prefixation of a- referring to the transitive subject and the external possessor. I conclude that in these constructions this prefix has the effect of backgrounding an entity and consequently assigning undivided focus to the subject or the possessor.
590 $a School code: 0142.
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Latin American studies. $3 2122903
650 4 $a Caribbean studies. $3 2122768
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0432
690 $a 0550
710 2 $a The University of New Mexico. $b Linguistics. $3 1679103
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-03A.
790 $a 0142
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10822041