東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ author_sort:"kaoutzanis, christodoulos." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Understanding the United Nations Sec...

Kaoutzanis, Christodoulos.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Understanding the United Nations Security Council's decisions to initiate atrocities investigations.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Understanding the United Nations Security Council's decisions to initiate atrocities investigations./
作者:	Kaoutzanis, Christodoulos.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	307 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-08A(E).
標題:	International relations. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10056402
ISBN:	9781339568195

Understanding the United Nations Security Council's decisions to initiate atrocities investigations.
Kaoutzanis, Christodoulos.

Understanding the United Nations Security Council's decisions to initiate atrocities investigations. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 307 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2016.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

Since the end of the Cold War, the United Nations Security Council ('UNSC') has taken a leading role in investigating atrocities. Yet, the UNSC has only investigated atrocities committed in eleven out of the ninety-two states that have experienced atrocities during this period. This dissertation examines the reasons behind this disparity. To do so, this dissertation examines how past studies on atrocities investigations do not account for the work of the UNSC in this field, and how past studies on the UNSC cannot explain its actions on atrocities investigations. Instead, by relying on historical records and interviews with decision-makers, this dissertation argues that the UNSC's decisions on which atrocities to investigate are committee projects, which can only be understood through the prism of the UNSC's decision-making process. Because of the constraints imposed by the UNSC process, an atrocities investigation will take place only after (i) a diplomat brings specific atrocities to the attention of the UNSC, (ii) an independent commission of inquiry supports the creation of an atrocities investigation, and (iii) the UNSC members become comfortable with the text of the authorizing resolution. This dissertation examines the political decisions behind each of these three steps and highlights how the decision-making process guides and influences the UNSC's actions. By doing so, it provides an explanation on the aforementioned double standard in the UNSC's work vis-a-vis atrocities.

ISBN: 9781339568195Subjects--Topical Terms:

531762
International relations.

Understanding the United Nations Security Council's decisions to initiate atrocities investigations.
LDR:02539nmm a2200313 4500 001 2117337
005 20170516070334.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339568195
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10056402
035 $a AAI10056402
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kaoutzanis, Christodoulos. $3 3279109
245 1 0 $a Understanding the United Nations Security Council's decisions to initiate atrocities investigations.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 307 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Michael W. Doyle.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2016.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
520 $a Since the end of the Cold War, the United Nations Security Council ('UNSC') has taken a leading role in investigating atrocities. Yet, the UNSC has only investigated atrocities committed in eleven out of the ninety-two states that have experienced atrocities during this period. This dissertation examines the reasons behind this disparity. To do so, this dissertation examines how past studies on atrocities investigations do not account for the work of the UNSC in this field, and how past studies on the UNSC cannot explain its actions on atrocities investigations. Instead, by relying on historical records and interviews with decision-makers, this dissertation argues that the UNSC's decisions on which atrocities to investigate are committee projects, which can only be understood through the prism of the UNSC's decision-making process. Because of the constraints imposed by the UNSC process, an atrocities investigation will take place only after (i) a diplomat brings specific atrocities to the attention of the UNSC, (ii) an independent commission of inquiry supports the creation of an atrocities investigation, and (iii) the UNSC members become comfortable with the text of the authorizing resolution. This dissertation examines the political decisions behind each of these three steps and highlights how the decision-making process guides and influences the UNSC's actions. By doing so, it provides an explanation on the aforementioned double standard in the UNSC's work vis-a-vis atrocities.
590 $a School code: 0054.
650 4 $a International relations. $3 531762
650 4 $a International law. $3 560784
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0616
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b Political Science. $3 1677427
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-08A(E).
790 $a 0054
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10056402