東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"IT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Mechanisms to enable follow-on innov...

Wernick, Alina.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Mechanisms to enable follow-on innovation = liability rules vs. open innovation models /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Mechanisms to enable follow-on innovation/ by Alina Wernick.
其他題名:	liability rules vs. open innovation models /
作者:	Wernick, Alina.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2021.,
面頁冊數:	xxiii, 450 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	Introduction -- Theory -- Open approaches to innovation -- Economic foundations of compulsory liability rules -- Legal foundations and sources of compulsory liability rules -- Compulsory licenses in patent law -- Denial of injunctive relief -- Compulsory liability rules in Competition Law -- Normative recommendation -- Conclusions.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Compulsory licensing of patents. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72257-9
ISBN:	9783030722579

Mechanisms to enable follow-on innovation = liability rules vs. open innovation models /
Wernick, Alina.

Mechanisms to enable follow-on innovationliability rules vs. open innovation models /[electronic resource] :by Alina Wernick. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2021. - xxiii, 450 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Munich studies on innovation and competition,v.152199-7462 ;. - Munich studies on innovation and competition ;v.15..

Introduction -- Theory -- Open approaches to innovation -- Economic foundations of compulsory liability rules -- Legal foundations and sources of compulsory liability rules -- Compulsory licenses in patent law -- Denial of injunctive relief -- Compulsory liability rules in Competition Law -- Normative recommendation -- Conclusions.

The patent system is based on "one-patent-per-product" presumption and therefore fails to sustain complex follow-on innovations that contain a number of patents. The book explains that follow-on innovations may be subject to market failures such as hold-ups and excessive royalties. For decades, scholars have debated whether the market problems can be solved with voluntary licensing i.e., open innovation, or with compulsory liability rules. The book concludes that neither approach is sufficient. On the one hand, incentives to engage in open innovation practices involving patents are insufficient. On the other hand, the existing compulsory liability rules in patent and competition law are not tailored to address follow-on innovator's interests. To transcend this problem, the author proposes a compulsory liability rule against the suppression of follow-on innovation, that paradoxically, fosters early-on voluntary licensing between patent holders and follow-on innovators. The book is aimed at patent and competition law scholars and practitioners, patent attorneys, managers, engineers and economists who either engage in open innovation involving patents or conduct research on the topic. It also offers insights to policy and law-makers reviewing the possibilities to foster open innovation initiatives or adapt the scope of patent remedies or employ compulsory licenses for patents.

ISBN: 9783030722579

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-72257-9doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

879601
Compulsory licensing of patents.

LC Class. No.: K1528 / .W47 2021

Dewey Class. No.: 346.0486

Mechanisms to enable follow-on innovation = liability rules vs. open innovation models /
LDR:02818nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 2240777
003 DE-He213
005 20210513202133.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 211111s2021 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030722579 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030722562 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-72257-9 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-72257-9
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a K1528 $b .W47 2021
072 7 $a LNJ $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW000000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LNJ $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 346.0486 $2 23
090 $a K1528 $b .W496 2021
100 1 $a Wernick, Alina. $3 3496015
245 1 0 $a Mechanisms to enable follow-on innovation $h [electronic resource] : $b liability rules vs. open innovation models / $c by Alina Wernick.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2021.
300 $a xxiii, 450 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Munich studies on innovation and competition, $x 2199-7462 ; $v v.15
505 0 $a Introduction -- Theory -- Open approaches to innovation -- Economic foundations of compulsory liability rules -- Legal foundations and sources of compulsory liability rules -- Compulsory licenses in patent law -- Denial of injunctive relief -- Compulsory liability rules in Competition Law -- Normative recommendation -- Conclusions.
520 $a The patent system is based on "one-patent-per-product" presumption and therefore fails to sustain complex follow-on innovations that contain a number of patents. The book explains that follow-on innovations may be subject to market failures such as hold-ups and excessive royalties. For decades, scholars have debated whether the market problems can be solved with voluntary licensing i.e., open innovation, or with compulsory liability rules. The book concludes that neither approach is sufficient. On the one hand, incentives to engage in open innovation practices involving patents are insufficient. On the other hand, the existing compulsory liability rules in patent and competition law are not tailored to address follow-on innovator's interests. To transcend this problem, the author proposes a compulsory liability rule against the suppression of follow-on innovation, that paradoxically, fosters early-on voluntary licensing between patent holders and follow-on innovators. The book is aimed at patent and competition law scholars and practitioners, patent attorneys, managers, engineers and economists who either engage in open innovation involving patents or conduct research on the topic. It also offers insights to policy and law-makers reviewing the possibilities to foster open innovation initiatives or adapt the scope of patent remedies or employ compulsory licenses for patents.
650 0 $a Compulsory licensing of patents. $3 879601
650 0 $a Antitrust law. $3 687534
650 1 4 $a IT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property. $3 3384747
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Munich studies on innovation and competition ; $v v.15. $3 3496016
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72257-9
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)