語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
到查詢結果
[ author_sort:"hume, david, (1711-1776.)" ]
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
A defense of Hume on miracles
~
Fogelin, Robert J.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
A defense of Hume on miracles
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
A defense of Hume on miracles/ Robert J. Fogelin.
作者:
Fogelin, Robert J.
出版者:
Princeton, N.J. :Princeton University Press, : ©2003.,
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (xii, 101 p.).
內容註:
The structure of Hume's argument -- Two recent critics -- The place of "Of Miracles" in Hume's philosophy.
標題:
Miracles. -
電子資源:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7sccj
ISBN:
9781400825776 (electronic bk.)
A defense of Hume on miracles
Fogelin, Robert J.
A defense of Hume on miracles
[electronic resource] /Robert J. Fogelin. - Princeton, N.J. :Princeton University Press,©2003. - 1 online resource (xii, 101 p.). - Princeton monographs in philosophy. - Princeton monographs in philosophy..
Includes bibliographical references (p. 95-96) and index.
The structure of Hume's argument -- Two recent critics -- The place of "Of Miracles" in Hume's philosophy.
"Since its publication in the mid-eighteenth century, Hume's discussion of miracles has been the target of severe and often ill-tempered attacks. In this book, one of our leading historians of philosophy offers a systematic response to these attacks." "Arguing that these criticisms have - from the very start - rested on misreadings, Robert Fogelin begins by providing a narrative of the way Hume's argument actually unfolds. What Hume's critics (and even some of his defenders) have failed to see is that Hume's primary argument depends on fixing the appropriate standards of evaluating testimony presented on behalf of a miracle. Given the definition of a miracle, Hume quite resonably argues that the standards for evaluating such testimony must be extremely high. Hume then argues that as a matter of fact, no testimony on behalf of a religious miracle has even come close to meeting the appropriate standards for acceptance. Fogelin illustrates that Hume's critics have consistently misunderstood the structure of this argument - and have saddled Hume with perfectly awful arguments not found in the text. He responds first to some early critics of Hume's argument and then to two recent critics, David Johnson and John Earman. Fogelin's goal, however, is not to "bash the bashers," but rather to show that Hume's treatment of miracles has a coherence, depth, and power that makes it still the best work on the subject."--Jacket.
ISBN: 9781400825776 (electronic bk.)Subjects--Personal Names:
565045
Hume, David,
1711-1776.Subjects--Topical Terms:
883873
Miracles.
LC Class. No.: B1499.M5 / F64 2010
Dewey Class. No.: 212
A defense of Hume on miracles
LDR
:02611cmm a2200325Ia 4500
001
1956165
003
OCoLC
005
20141031020534.0
006
m o d
007
cr cnu---unuuu
008
150126s2003 nju ob 001 0 eng d
020
$a
9781400825776 (electronic bk.)
020
$a
1400825776 (electronic bk.)
020
$z
0691114307 (alk. paper)
020
$z
9780691114309 (alk. paper)
020
$z
0691122431 (pbk.)
020
$z
9780691122434 (pbk.)
035
$a
(OCoLC)650305519
035
$a
ocn650305519
040
$a
N
$b
eng
$e
pn
$c
N
$d
EBLCP
$d
OCLCQ
$d
JSTOR
$d
COO
$d
OCLCQ
$d
OCLCF
$d
OCLCQ
050
4
$a
B1499.M5
$b
F64 2010
082
0 4
$a
212
$2
22
100
1
$a
Fogelin, Robert J.
$3
667825
245
1 2
$a
A defense of Hume on miracles
$h
[electronic resource] /
$c
Robert J. Fogelin.
260
$a
Princeton, N.J. :
$b
Princeton University Press,
$c
©2003.
300
$a
1 online resource (xii, 101 p.).
490
1
$a
Princeton monographs in philosophy
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references (p. 95-96) and index.
505
0
$a
The structure of Hume's argument -- Two recent critics -- The place of "Of Miracles" in Hume's philosophy.
520
1
$a
"Since its publication in the mid-eighteenth century, Hume's discussion of miracles has been the target of severe and often ill-tempered attacks. In this book, one of our leading historians of philosophy offers a systematic response to these attacks." "Arguing that these criticisms have - from the very start - rested on misreadings, Robert Fogelin begins by providing a narrative of the way Hume's argument actually unfolds. What Hume's critics (and even some of his defenders) have failed to see is that Hume's primary argument depends on fixing the appropriate standards of evaluating testimony presented on behalf of a miracle. Given the definition of a miracle, Hume quite resonably argues that the standards for evaluating such testimony must be extremely high. Hume then argues that as a matter of fact, no testimony on behalf of a religious miracle has even come close to meeting the appropriate standards for acceptance. Fogelin illustrates that Hume's critics have consistently misunderstood the structure of this argument - and have saddled Hume with perfectly awful arguments not found in the text. He responds first to some early critics of Hume's argument and then to two recent critics, David Johnson and John Earman. Fogelin's goal, however, is not to "bash the bashers," but rather to show that Hume's treatment of miracles has a coherence, depth, and power that makes it still the best work on the subject."--Jacket.
588
0
$a
Print version record.
600
1 0
$a
Hume, David,
$d
1711-1776.
$3
565045
650
0
$a
Miracles.
$3
883873
830
0
$a
Princeton monographs in philosophy.
$3
1558748
856
4 0
$u
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7sccj
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9251626
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB B1499.M5 F64 2010
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入