東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Environmental law." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Weakest Link? Evaluating Private...

Bowley, Gregory Freeman Wayne.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Weakest Link? Evaluating Private Nuisance Liability in Ontario's Environmental Law Context.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Weakest Link? Evaluating Private Nuisance Liability in Ontario's Environmental Law Context./
作者:	Bowley, Gregory Freeman Wayne.
面頁冊數:	81 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-02.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International55-02(E).
標題:	Law. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1604129
ISBN:	9781339262338

The Weakest Link? Evaluating Private Nuisance Liability in Ontario's Environmental Law Context.
Bowley, Gregory Freeman Wayne.

The Weakest Link? Evaluating Private Nuisance Liability in Ontario's Environmental Law Context. - 81 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-02.

Thesis (LL.M.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2015.

The Court of Appeal for Ontario's decision in Smith v Inco Ltd illustrates the degree to which the law of private nuisance and Rylands v Fletcher liability has evolved over the last hundred and fifty years from strict(ish) liability tort doctrines to fault-based means of recovery. Inco also offers an opportunity to consider whether this evolution has left some wronged landowners behind.

ISBN: 9781339262338Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

The Weakest Link? Evaluating Private Nuisance Liability in Ontario's Environmental Law Context.
LDR:01888nmm a2200289 4500 001 2078727
005 20161129073850.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339262338
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1604129
035 $a AAI1604129
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Bowley, Gregory Freeman Wayne. $3 3194333
245 1 4 $a The Weakest Link? Evaluating Private Nuisance Liability in Ontario's Environmental Law Context.
300 $a 81 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-02.
500 $a Adviser: Andrew Green.
502 $a Thesis (LL.M.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2015.
520 $a The Court of Appeal for Ontario's decision in Smith v Inco Ltd illustrates the degree to which the law of private nuisance and Rylands v Fletcher liability has evolved over the last hundred and fifty years from strict(ish) liability tort doctrines to fault-based means of recovery. Inco also offers an opportunity to consider whether this evolution has left some wronged landowners behind.
520 $a This work considers the evolution of private nuisance and Rylands liability into the tort doctrine(s) they are today, and illustrates the Province of Ontario's statutory response to that evolution in the environmental contamination context. Ontario's common law and statutory environmental compensation regime is then evaluated in the context of four distinct measures of wrongfulness from two theoretical schools of liability. Where Ontario's regime is found to permit wrongful loss without recovery, statutory changes to extend rights of compensation to all landowners suffering wrongful loss are proposed.
590 $a School code: 0779.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Environmental law. $3 560666
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0439
710 2 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $b Law. $3 2093829
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 55-02(E).
790 $a 0779
791 $a LL.M.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1604129