東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"English as a Second Language." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Developing and Evaluating Corpus-Bas...

Chen, Mo.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Developing and Evaluating Corpus-Based Feedback.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Developing and Evaluating Corpus-Based Feedback./
作者:	Chen, Mo.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	218 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-12A.
標題:	English as a Second Language. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13864922
ISBN:	9781392264720

Developing and Evaluating Corpus-Based Feedback.
Chen, Mo.

Developing and Evaluating Corpus-Based Feedback. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 218 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Iowa State University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This dissertation outlines the development of a system of corpus-based feedback and evaluates its effects on students' error correction and language learning. The design of the corpus-based feedback used in the study was informed by two SLA theories: the Interactionist Approach and Skill-learning Theory. The dissertation theorizes all aspects of the feedback design and discusses the various features of corpus-based feedback from SLA theoretical perspectives. To evaluate the quality of corpus-based feedback, the study compared it to that of traditional coded feedback. Based on the logical framework for evaluating CALL corrective feedback and Chapelle's evaluation criteria (2001), five research questions were developed concerning three qualities of CALL corrective feedback: language learning potential, learner fit, and impact.To address the five research questions concerning language learning potential, learner fit, and impact, the study employed a mixed-methods approach to collect quantitative and qualitative data from 90 participants to evaluate and compare the effects of corpus-based and coded feedback. The quantitative data consisted of scores measuring the immediate effects of feedback in error correction exercises, scores measuring learning gains demonstrated by the pre- and post-tests, and students' ratings of the effects of feedback in Likert-scale questionnaires. The qualitative data consisted of think-aloud exercises and semi-structured interviews, which played an important role in describing participants' learning experiences with the intervention.Compared to students using traditional coded feedback, students treated with corpus-based feedback had greater success correcting errors in two error correction practice exercises and transferring knowledge to correct errors in a new text during the post-test. The benefits of the corpus-based feedback were also confirmed by students in the think-aloud activities and interviews. In addition, the data yielded strong evidence that advanced-low ESL learners found corpus-based feedback to be more appropriate than coded feedback for enabling correction of syntactic errors; students perceived that corpus-based feedback exerted a more positive impact on their affective, cognitive, and intrinsic development towards error correction than the coded feedback. The research methodology and findings of this dissertation make extensive contributions to corrective feedback research and the utility of theoretical approaches in tool development and learning evaluation.

ISBN: 9781392264720Subjects--Topical Terms:

3423938
English as a Second Language.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Corpus-based

Developing and Evaluating Corpus-Based Feedback.
LDR:03664nmm a2200349 4500 001 2267799
005 20200821052205.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392264720
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13864922
035 $a (MiAaPQ)iastate:18089
035 $a AAI13864922
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Chen, Mo. $3 3350259
245 1 0 $a Developing and Evaluating Corpus-Based Feedback.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 218 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Chapelle, Carol.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Iowa State University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This dissertation outlines the development of a system of corpus-based feedback and evaluates its effects on students' error correction and language learning. The design of the corpus-based feedback used in the study was informed by two SLA theories: the Interactionist Approach and Skill-learning Theory. The dissertation theorizes all aspects of the feedback design and discusses the various features of corpus-based feedback from SLA theoretical perspectives. To evaluate the quality of corpus-based feedback, the study compared it to that of traditional coded feedback. Based on the logical framework for evaluating CALL corrective feedback and Chapelle's evaluation criteria (2001), five research questions were developed concerning three qualities of CALL corrective feedback: language learning potential, learner fit, and impact.To address the five research questions concerning language learning potential, learner fit, and impact, the study employed a mixed-methods approach to collect quantitative and qualitative data from 90 participants to evaluate and compare the effects of corpus-based and coded feedback. The quantitative data consisted of scores measuring the immediate effects of feedback in error correction exercises, scores measuring learning gains demonstrated by the pre- and post-tests, and students' ratings of the effects of feedback in Likert-scale questionnaires. The qualitative data consisted of think-aloud exercises and semi-structured interviews, which played an important role in describing participants' learning experiences with the intervention.Compared to students using traditional coded feedback, students treated with corpus-based feedback had greater success correcting errors in two error correction practice exercises and transferring knowledge to correct errors in a new text during the post-test. The benefits of the corpus-based feedback were also confirmed by students in the think-aloud activities and interviews. In addition, the data yielded strong evidence that advanced-low ESL learners found corpus-based feedback to be more appropriate than coded feedback for enabling correction of syntactic errors; students perceived that corpus-based feedback exerted a more positive impact on their affective, cognitive, and intrinsic development towards error correction than the coded feedback. The research methodology and findings of this dissertation make extensive contributions to corrective feedback research and the utility of theoretical approaches in tool development and learning evaluation.
590 $a School code: 0097.
650 4 $a English as a Second Language. $3 3423938
653 $a Corpus-based
653 $a Corrective feedback
653 $a Syntactic errors
690 $a 0441
710 2 $a Iowa State University. $b English. $3 1020984
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-12A.
790 $a 0097
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13864922