東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Education philosophy." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Exploring the Nature of Models in Sc...

Belarmino, Jeremy J.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Exploring the Nature of Models in Science, Philosophy of Science, and Science Education.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Exploring the Nature of Models in Science, Philosophy of Science, and Science Education./
作者:	Belarmino, Jeremy J.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	192 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-07A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13804625
ISBN:	9780438729438

Exploring the Nature of Models in Science, Philosophy of Science, and Science Education.
Belarmino, Jeremy J.

Exploring the Nature of Models in Science, Philosophy of Science, and Science Education. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 192 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2017.

This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.

The term model is ubiquitous in science, philosophy of science, and science education. Although there is no general consensus regarding its definition, the traditional approach in all of these disciplines has always been to view models as some kind of representation of reality. Recently, however, there has been a move towards non-representational and deflationary accounts of modeling that eschew the notion that models must come equipped with both necessary and sufficient conditions. Following the philosophy of the later Wittgenstein, I develop my own narrative concerning modeling called the integration account. The integration account maintains that models are comprised of various elements that are organized in a distinctive way in order to solve scientific problems. Some of these elements include, but are not limited to: theories, laws, theory-ladenness of ideas, choice, funding availability, feasibility, social relationships, and even serendipity. The integration account encounters some difficulty when it is applied to the field of science education, in particular science teaching. The latter's pedagogical project appears to run contrary to the integration account's commitment to solving scientific problems. As a result, I propose that pedagogical models and scientific models be viewed as separate kinds of models, each replete with their own separate function. Scientific models should only be used by professional scientists to solve scientific problems and not used as teaching tools by science teachers. The reverse is also true. Pedagogical models can still be used by science teachers even if they have run their course when it comes to solving scientific problems.

ISBN: 9780438729438Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Model

Exploring the Nature of Models in Science, Philosophy of Science, and Science Education.
LDR:02949nmm a2200373 4500 001 2268102
005 20200810100541.5
008 220629s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438729438
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13804625
035 $a (MiAaPQ)99342
035 $a AAI13804625
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Belarmino, Jeremy J. $3 3545359
245 1 0 $a Exploring the Nature of Models in Science, Philosophy of Science, and Science Education.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 192 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Burbules, Nicholas.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2017.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The term model is ubiquitous in science, philosophy of science, and science education. Although there is no general consensus regarding its definition, the traditional approach in all of these disciplines has always been to view models as some kind of representation of reality. Recently, however, there has been a move towards non-representational and deflationary accounts of modeling that eschew the notion that models must come equipped with both necessary and sufficient conditions. Following the philosophy of the later Wittgenstein, I develop my own narrative concerning modeling called the integration account. The integration account maintains that models are comprised of various elements that are organized in a distinctive way in order to solve scientific problems. Some of these elements include, but are not limited to: theories, laws, theory-ladenness of ideas, choice, funding availability, feasibility, social relationships, and even serendipity. The integration account encounters some difficulty when it is applied to the field of science education, in particular science teaching. The latter's pedagogical project appears to run contrary to the integration account's commitment to solving scientific problems. As a result, I propose that pedagogical models and scientific models be viewed as separate kinds of models, each replete with their own separate function. Scientific models should only be used by professional scientists to solve scientific problems and not used as teaching tools by science teachers. The reverse is also true. Pedagogical models can still be used by science teachers even if they have run their course when it comes to solving scientific problems.
590 $a School code: 0090.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
650 4 $a Education philosophy. $3 3422391
653 $a Model
653 $a Science education
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0998
710 2 $a University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. $b Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp. $3 2096308
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-07A.
790 $a 0090
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13804625