東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Education, Finance." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Examination and analysis of educatio...

Lange, George L., Jr.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Examination and analysis of education finance litigation in the context of judicial review and the utilization of statistical indices of equity.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Examination and analysis of education finance litigation in the context of judicial review and the utilization of statistical indices of equity./
作者:	Lange, George L., Jr.
面頁冊數:	435 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-09, Section: A, page: 3219.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-09A.
標題:	Education, Finance. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3188087
ISBN:	9780542304255

Examination and analysis of education finance litigation in the context of judicial review and the utilization of statistical indices of equity.
Lange, George L., Jr.

Examination and analysis of education finance litigation in the context of judicial review and the utilization of statistical indices of equity. - 435 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-09, Section: A, page: 3219.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2005.

The purpose of this study was fourfold; to examine the explicit utilization of statistical indices of equity in education finance litigation, a consideration of the same within the context of the ongoing dialogue addressing judicial activism and the role of the judiciary in American polity, the possible implications of the findings of the former for the later, and lastly, provision of a framework with which to further explore education finance, weighing its philosophical grounding, the larger question of judicial review and the evolution from an appreciation of equity to one of adequacy. To that end, ninety-seven cases in total were addressed, from Sawyer v. Gilmore, in 1912 to Hoke County Board of Education v. State, in 2004. Of these cases, seventy-seven were state high court decisions, nine from state appellate courts, six from federal district courts, one from a federal circuit court, and six cases before the United States Supreme Court. The review of the education finance cases herein demonstrated a state jurisprudential stance that has generally been grounded in Article III doctrine, despite significant institutional, administrative, and constitutional differences between state and federal courts. Yet, while the courts have historically carefully guarded application of judicial review, the emerging judicial trend exhibits a more aggressive posture, rendering decisions which present with tenuous constitutional groundings, venture far into the realm of remedial prescription and oversight and cast the courts as quasi-legislatures that define educational policy and goals, while constraining fiscal discretion. The study of statistical indices over the course of the litigation record offers a clear conclusion; few courts have called for complex statistical data and for the most part, at the appellate level and beyond, simple indices were employed solely to inform the details of a case but were irrelevant to the philosophical issue and the court's predisposition.

ISBN: 9780542304255Subjects--Topical Terms:

1020300
Education, Finance.

Examination and analysis of education finance litigation in the context of judicial review and the utilization of statistical indices of equity.
LDR:02946nmm 2200277 4500 001 1826729
005 20061215124247.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542304255
035 $a (UnM)AAI3188087
035 $a AAI3188087
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Lange, George L., Jr. $3 1915684
245 1 0 $a Examination and analysis of education finance litigation in the context of judicial review and the utilization of statistical indices of equity.
300 $a 435 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-09, Section: A, page: 3219.
500 $a Chair: R. Craig Wood.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2005.
520 $a The purpose of this study was fourfold; to examine the explicit utilization of statistical indices of equity in education finance litigation, a consideration of the same within the context of the ongoing dialogue addressing judicial activism and the role of the judiciary in American polity, the possible implications of the findings of the former for the later, and lastly, provision of a framework with which to further explore education finance, weighing its philosophical grounding, the larger question of judicial review and the evolution from an appreciation of equity to one of adequacy. To that end, ninety-seven cases in total were addressed, from Sawyer v. Gilmore, in 1912 to Hoke County Board of Education v. State, in 2004. Of these cases, seventy-seven were state high court decisions, nine from state appellate courts, six from federal district courts, one from a federal circuit court, and six cases before the United States Supreme Court. The review of the education finance cases herein demonstrated a state jurisprudential stance that has generally been grounded in Article III doctrine, despite significant institutional, administrative, and constitutional differences between state and federal courts. Yet, while the courts have historically carefully guarded application of judicial review, the emerging judicial trend exhibits a more aggressive posture, rendering decisions which present with tenuous constitutional groundings, venture far into the realm of remedial prescription and oversight and cast the courts as quasi-legislatures that define educational policy and goals, while constraining fiscal discretion. The study of statistical indices over the course of the litigation record offers a clear conclusion; few courts have called for complex statistical data and for the most part, at the appellate level and beyond, simple indices were employed solely to inform the details of a case but were irrelevant to the philosophical issue and the court's predisposition.
590 $a School code: 0070.
650 4 $a Education, Finance. $3 1020300
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
690 $a 0277
690 $a 0398
710 2 0 $a University of Florida. $3 718949
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-09A.
790 1 0 $a Wood, R. Craig, $e advisor
790 $a 0070
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3188087