東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Early Modern/Renaissance Literature." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Revisiting Shakespeare's lost play =...

Payne, Deborah C.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Revisiting Shakespeare's lost play = Cardenio/Double falsehood in the eighteenth century /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Revisiting Shakespeare's lost play/ edited by Deborah C. Payne.
其他題名:	Cardenio/Double falsehood in the eighteenth century /
其他作者:	Payne, Deborah C.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2016.,
面頁冊數:	xi, 138 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	Introduction; Fiona Ritchie -- Believers versus Skeptics: An Assessment of the Cardenio/Double Falsehood Problem; Robert D. Hume -- The Jolt of Jacobean Tragicomedy: Double Falsehood on the Eighteenth-Century English Stage; Diana Solomon -- Ghostwriting: Lewis Theobald's Double Falsehood as Adaptation; Jean I. Marsden -- Textual Skirmishes and Theatrical Frays: Putting Double Falsehood Back in the Eighteenth Century; Deborah C. Payne -- Bibliography -- Index.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	English drama - History and criticism. - 18th century -
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46514-2
ISBN:	9783319465142

Revisiting Shakespeare's lost play = Cardenio/Double falsehood in the eighteenth century /
Revisiting Shakespeare's lost playCardenio/Double falsehood in the eighteenth century /[electronic resource] :edited by Deborah C. Payne. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2016. - xi, 138 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Introduction; Fiona Ritchie -- Believers versus Skeptics: An Assessment of the Cardenio/Double Falsehood Problem; Robert D. Hume -- The Jolt of Jacobean Tragicomedy: Double Falsehood on the Eighteenth-Century English Stage; Diana Solomon -- Ghostwriting: Lewis Theobald's Double Falsehood as Adaptation; Jean I. Marsden -- Textual Skirmishes and Theatrical Frays: Putting Double Falsehood Back in the Eighteenth Century; Deborah C. Payne -- Bibliography -- Index.

'This uniformly excellent collection does what none of the other recent scholarship on Double Falsehood or Cardenio does: it approaches the complex problems of authorship, performance, form and gender politics from the perspective of Restoration and eighteenth-century theatre. Anyone seriously interested in the Jacobean play, its Georgian adaptation, or in English drama from 1660 to 1740 should read this book.' - Gary Taylor, General Editor, The New Oxford Shakespeare This collection of essays centres on Double Falsehood, Lewis Theobald's 1727 adaptation of the "lost" play of Cardenio, possibly co-authored by John Fletcher and William Shakespeare. In a departure from most scholarship to date, the contributors fold Double Falsehood back into the milieu for which it was created rather than searching for traces of Shakespeare in the text. Robert D. Hume's knowledge of theatre history permits a fresh take on the forgery question as well as the Shakespeare authorship controversy. Diana Solomon's understanding of eighteenth-century rape culture and Jean I. Marsden's command of contemporary adaptation practices both emphasise the play's immediate social and theatrical contexts. And, finally, Deborah C. Payne's familiarity with the eighteenth-century stage allows for a reconsideration of Double Falsehood as integral to a debate between Theobald, Alexander Pope, and John Gay over the future of the English drama. Deborah C. Payne is an Associate Professor of Literature at American University. She specializes in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century drama, theatre history, and performance theory. Her publications include Cultural Readings of Restoration and Eighteenth-Century English Theatre, co-edited with J. Douglas Canfield; The Cambridge Companion to English Restoration Theatre; and Four Restoration Libertine Plays. Recently she completed The Commodiluxe Stage: A New History of Restoration Theatre, 1660-1700.

ISBN: 9783319465142

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-46514-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

679246
English drama
--History and criticism.--18th century

LC Class. No.: PR2858 / .R48 2016

Dewey Class. No.: 822.33

Revisiting Shakespeare's lost play = Cardenio/Double falsehood in the eighteenth century /
LDR:03395nmm a2200313 a 4500 001 2084173
003 DE-He213
005 20170204064618.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 170820s2016 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319465142 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319465135 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-46514-2 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-46514-2
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a PR2858 $b .R48 2016
072 7 $a DSB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LIT024000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 822.33 $2 23
090 $a PR2858 $b .R454 2016
245 0 0 $a Revisiting Shakespeare's lost play $h [electronic resource] : $b Cardenio/Double falsehood in the eighteenth century / $c edited by Deborah C. Payne.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2016.
300 $a xi, 138 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Introduction; Fiona Ritchie -- Believers versus Skeptics: An Assessment of the Cardenio/Double Falsehood Problem; Robert D. Hume -- The Jolt of Jacobean Tragicomedy: Double Falsehood on the Eighteenth-Century English Stage; Diana Solomon -- Ghostwriting: Lewis Theobald's Double Falsehood as Adaptation; Jean I. Marsden -- Textual Skirmishes and Theatrical Frays: Putting Double Falsehood Back in the Eighteenth Century; Deborah C. Payne -- Bibliography -- Index.
520 $a 'This uniformly excellent collection does what none of the other recent scholarship on Double Falsehood or Cardenio does: it approaches the complex problems of authorship, performance, form and gender politics from the perspective of Restoration and eighteenth-century theatre. Anyone seriously interested in the Jacobean play, its Georgian adaptation, or in English drama from 1660 to 1740 should read this book.' - Gary Taylor, General Editor, The New Oxford Shakespeare This collection of essays centres on Double Falsehood, Lewis Theobald's 1727 adaptation of the "lost" play of Cardenio, possibly co-authored by John Fletcher and William Shakespeare. In a departure from most scholarship to date, the contributors fold Double Falsehood back into the milieu for which it was created rather than searching for traces of Shakespeare in the text. Robert D. Hume's knowledge of theatre history permits a fresh take on the forgery question as well as the Shakespeare authorship controversy. Diana Solomon's understanding of eighteenth-century rape culture and Jean I. Marsden's command of contemporary adaptation practices both emphasise the play's immediate social and theatrical contexts. And, finally, Deborah C. Payne's familiarity with the eighteenth-century stage allows for a reconsideration of Double Falsehood as integral to a debate between Theobald, Alexander Pope, and John Gay over the future of the English drama. Deborah C. Payne is an Associate Professor of Literature at American University. She specializes in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century drama, theatre history, and performance theory. Her publications include Cultural Readings of Restoration and Eighteenth-Century English Theatre, co-edited with J. Douglas Canfield; The Cambridge Companion to English Restoration Theatre; and Four Restoration Libertine Plays. Recently she completed The Commodiluxe Stage: A New History of Restoration Theatre, 1660-1700.
650 0 $a English drama $y 18th century $x History and criticism. $3 679246
650 1 4 $a Literature. $3 537498
650 2 4 $a Early Modern/Renaissance Literature. $3 2182039
650 2 4 $a Eighteenth-Century Literature. $3 2181927
650 2 4 $a Theatre History. $3 2181960
700 1 $a Payne, Deborah C. $3 3210070
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46514-2
950 $a Literature, Cultural and Media Studies (Springer-41173)