東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Design." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Effects of interdisciplinary designe...

Baaki, John.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Effects of interdisciplinary designers reflecting-in-action during design.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Effects of interdisciplinary designers reflecting-in-action during design./
作者:	Baaki, John.
面頁冊數:	335 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-02(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-02A(E).
標題:	Design. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3640101
ISBN:	9781321252576

Effects of interdisciplinary designers reflecting-in-action during design.
Baaki, John.

Effects of interdisciplinary designers reflecting-in-action during design. - 335 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wayne State University, 2014.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

As a specific type of reflective practice, reflection-in-action emphasizes that unique and uncertain situations are understood through attempts to change them, and changed through the attempts to understand the situations (Schon, 1983). The purpose of this interdisciplinary research was to study reflection-in-action regarding three aspects of design activity (content, context, and process). The study addressed four research questions: (a) what is the impact of reflection-in-action on evaluation processes while a design is developing and not yet complete, (b) what effect does reflection-in-action have on keeping a design project moving forward toward implementation, (c) what impact does the design's problem-solution relationship have on the reflection-in-action process, and (d) what impact does a designer drawing from a repertoire of precedents inside and outside the project have on the reflection-in-action process?

ISBN: 9781321252576Subjects--Topical Terms:

518875
Design.

Effects of interdisciplinary designers reflecting-in-action during design.
LDR:03521nmm a2200301 4500 001 2059552
005 20150803085000.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321252576
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3640101
035 $a AAI3640101
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Baaki, John. $3 3173637
245 1 0 $a Effects of interdisciplinary designers reflecting-in-action during design.
300 $a 335 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Monica W. Tracey.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wayne State University, 2014.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a As a specific type of reflective practice, reflection-in-action emphasizes that unique and uncertain situations are understood through attempts to change them, and changed through the attempts to understand the situations (Schon, 1983). The purpose of this interdisciplinary research was to study reflection-in-action regarding three aspects of design activity (content, context, and process). The study addressed four research questions: (a) what is the impact of reflection-in-action on evaluation processes while a design is developing and not yet complete, (b) what effect does reflection-in-action have on keeping a design project moving forward toward implementation, (c) what impact does the design's problem-solution relationship have on the reflection-in-action process, and (d) what impact does a designer drawing from a repertoire of precedents inside and outside the project have on the reflection-in-action process?
520 $a The phenomenological research design studied reflection-in-action using a qualitative approach and used a purposive convenience sample of eight participants designing real projects in their design environments. Using five data collection methods: (a) interviews (b) participant reflective journals, (c) design project timeline, (d) project artifact analysis, and (e) a field journal, data were collected and trustworthiness was established through credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. A constant comparison method was used to compare information units applicable to categories and to integrate properties of categories.
520 $a For each research question, three to five themes emerged. Interesting and compelling themes that have implications for instructional design included when participants reflected-in-action, they took stock in and reacted to external representations, which were rich in context, information, and constraints. Participants interacted with information and a lack of information, which kept the design project moving forward. Participants moved the design forward toward implementation by turning "what ifs" to design decisions. Through receiving and gathering information and working with constraints, participants better understood the problem-solution relationship. Drawing from outside of the design validated design direction, guided the design, and provided "what ifs". Drawing from inside the design informed what could and could not be done, supported the design purpose, and guided the design. Drawing on participants' experience provided design context and made uncertainty more certain.
590 $a School code: 0254.
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
690 $a 0389
710 2 $a Wayne State University. $b Instructional Technology. $3 1022237
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-02A(E).
790 $a 0254
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3640101