東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Criminology." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Envisioning Risk and Constructing Re...

Werth, Robert Joseph.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Envisioning Risk and Constructing Responsibility: Plasticity, Punitive Regulation, and the Re-shaping of Rehabilitation within California Parole.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Envisioning Risk and Constructing Responsibility: Plasticity, Punitive Regulation, and the Re-shaping of Rehabilitation within California Parole./
作者:	Werth, Robert Joseph.
面頁冊數:	258 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-08, Section: A, page: 2974.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-08A.
標題:	Criminology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3457243
ISBN:	9781124674919

Envisioning Risk and Constructing Responsibility: Plasticity, Punitive Regulation, and the Re-shaping of Rehabilitation within California Parole.
Werth, Robert Joseph.

Envisioning Risk and Constructing Responsibility: Plasticity, Punitive Regulation, and the Re-shaping of Rehabilitation within California Parole. - 258 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-08, Section: A, page: 2974.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Irvine, 2011.

This dissertation examines how parole in California is enacted by field personnel (parole agents and supervisors) and how recent policy changes are impacting this process. I document how agents and supervisory staff understand and implement the formal goals of the California parole agency, the Division of Adult Parole Operations (DAPO). I also examine how the multiple elements of parole -- punitive, risk oriented, and reformative -- operate and give shape to the actions of parole personnel. Related to this, I analyze how recent policy changes, which promote both rehabilitation and a risk-oriented approach, are impacting how parole functions.

ISBN: 9781124674919Subjects--Topical Terms:

533274
Criminology.

Envisioning Risk and Constructing Responsibility: Plasticity, Punitive Regulation, and the Re-shaping of Rehabilitation within California Parole.
LDR:03474nmm a2200313 4500 001 2061134
005 20150929074107.5
008 170521s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124674919
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3457243
035 $a AAI3457243
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Werth, Robert Joseph. $3 3175363
245 1 0 $a Envisioning Risk and Constructing Responsibility: Plasticity, Punitive Regulation, and the Re-shaping of Rehabilitation within California Parole.
300 $a 258 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-08, Section: A, page: 2974.
500 $a Adviser: Elliott Currie.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Irvine, 2011.
520 $a This dissertation examines how parole in California is enacted by field personnel (parole agents and supervisors) and how recent policy changes are impacting this process. I document how agents and supervisory staff understand and implement the formal goals of the California parole agency, the Division of Adult Parole Operations (DAPO). I also examine how the multiple elements of parole -- punitive, risk oriented, and reformative -- operate and give shape to the actions of parole personnel. Related to this, I analyze how recent policy changes, which promote both rehabilitation and a risk-oriented approach, are impacting how parole functions.
520 $a This project was conducted as a multi-sited ethnography at multiple physical sites throughout California, as well as at multiple analytic levels. Data was collected over a period of fifteen months through a combination of: (1) participant observation, (2) interviews (both semi-structured and unstructured), (3) archival/ document analysis, and (4) focus groups with DAPO personnel.
520 $a In this project, I highlight that although parole entails diverse, fragmented and divergent elements, it displays plasticity -- more than fracture or contradiction -- and ultimately represents an integrated exercise of both productive and repressive penal power. Importantly, I contend that parole manifests plasticity (in that it links together divergent elements), and that the nature of this plasticity entails particular configurations that privilege the punitive, regulatory control of responsibilized paroled subjects.
520 $a The integration of the various goals and elements of parole is made possible, I argue, by two divergent assumptions about paroled subjects. First, individuals are constructed as responsible for their own self-betterment; they are responsibilized subjects accountable for their own transition back to full citizenship. Second, they are simultaneously viewed as inherently risky, unlikely to actually change, and in need of State supervision and regulation.
520 $a Rehabilitative services are present within DAPO, but my data suggest that the public (re)commitment to rehabilitation is, in large part, a symbolic effort. The penetration of neoliberal assumptions and techniques has led to an emerging logic of rehabilitation wherein the State is not responsible for guaranteeing or even bringing about reformation, so much as serving as a (partial) resource and partner to penal subjects who are expected to reform themselves.
590 $a School code: 0030.
650 4 $a Criminology. $3 533274
690 $a 0627
710 2 $a University of California, Irvine. $b Criminology, Law and Society - Ph.D.. $3 2102171
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-08A.
790 $a 0030
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2011
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3457243