東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ author_sort:"zhang, hui." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Conflicting health-related scientifi...

Zhang, Hui.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Conflicting health-related scientific evidence in news reports: Effects of presentation format and hedging on perceived issue uncertainty and source credibility.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Conflicting health-related scientific evidence in news reports: Effects of presentation format and hedging on perceived issue uncertainty and source credibility./
作者:	Zhang, Hui.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	203 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-03A(E).
標題:	Communication. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10149778
ISBN:	9781369048742

Conflicting health-related scientific evidence in news reports: Effects of presentation format and hedging on perceived issue uncertainty and source credibility.
Zhang, Hui.

Conflicting health-related scientific evidence in news reports: Effects of presentation format and hedging on perceived issue uncertainty and source credibility. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 203 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Colorado State University, 2016.

This study examined the effects of two journalistic practices in reporting conflicting health-related scientific evidence on journalists' and scientists' credibility and whether the effects were mediated by perceived issue uncertainty. The two practices examined were presentation format and hedging. When conflicting findings are reported, journalists can use either a one-article format, using one story to report the conflict, or a two-article format, using two stories with each story representing one side of the conflict. When conflicting findings are reported, journalists can use hedging (e.g., reporting the limitations of scientific studies) to present the conflicting information. An online experiment was conducted to examine the two journalistic practices' effects. Results include the following: 1) the one-article format was beneficial to journalists' competence, but detrimental to scientists' competence, as compared with the two-article format; 2) journalists' and scientists' credibility in the hedged news conditions did not differ from those in the non-hedged news conditions; and 3) perceived issue uncertainty did not mediate presentation format's or hedging's effects on journalists' or scientists' credibility. An exploratory follow-up mediation analysis found that perceived message believability mediated presentation format's effects on journalists' and scientists' credibility. Theoretical, practical, and methodological implications are discussed.

ISBN: 9781369048742Subjects--Topical Terms:

524709
Communication.

Conflicting health-related scientific evidence in news reports: Effects of presentation format and hedging on perceived issue uncertainty and source credibility.
LDR:02512nmm a2200301 4500 001 2153598
005 20180209091348.5
008 190424s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369048742
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10149778
035 $a (MiAaPQ)colostate:13660
035 $a AAI10149778
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Zhang, Hui. $3 1019075
245 1 0 $a Conflicting health-related scientific evidence in news reports: Effects of presentation format and hedging on perceived issue uncertainty and source credibility.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 203 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Marilee Long.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Colorado State University, 2016.
520 $a This study examined the effects of two journalistic practices in reporting conflicting health-related scientific evidence on journalists' and scientists' credibility and whether the effects were mediated by perceived issue uncertainty. The two practices examined were presentation format and hedging. When conflicting findings are reported, journalists can use either a one-article format, using one story to report the conflict, or a two-article format, using two stories with each story representing one side of the conflict. When conflicting findings are reported, journalists can use hedging (e.g., reporting the limitations of scientific studies) to present the conflicting information. An online experiment was conducted to examine the two journalistic practices' effects. Results include the following: 1) the one-article format was beneficial to journalists' competence, but detrimental to scientists' competence, as compared with the two-article format; 2) journalists' and scientists' credibility in the hedged news conditions did not differ from those in the non-hedged news conditions; and 3) perceived issue uncertainty did not mediate presentation format's or hedging's effects on journalists' or scientists' credibility. An exploratory follow-up mediation analysis found that perceived message believability mediated presentation format's effects on journalists' and scientists' credibility. Theoretical, practical, and methodological implications are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0053.
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Journalism. $3 576107
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0391
710 2 $a Colorado State University. $b Journalism and Media Communication. $3 3276536
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-03A(E).
790 $a 0053
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10149778