語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
到查詢結果
[ subject:"Clinical psychology." ]
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
A measure of interpretation bias in ...
~
Boffa, Joseph William, III.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
A measure of interpretation bias in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
A measure of interpretation bias in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder./
作者:
Boffa, Joseph William, III.
面頁冊數:
27 p.
附註:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-03.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International54-03(E).
標題:
Clinical psychology. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1584946
ISBN:
9781321604641
A measure of interpretation bias in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
Boffa, Joseph William, III.
A measure of interpretation bias in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
- 27 p.
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-03.
Thesis (M.A.)--San Diego State University, 2015.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
Researchers have developed methods of measuring interpretation of ambiguous situations in anxious individuals. However, to our knowledge, no measure exists that would allow the examination of benign (i.e., non-threatening) and threat interpretations in individuals with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The present study outlines the development and validation of such a measure. Using a word-sentence association paradigm (e.g., WSAP,) 202 individuals provided ratings of how well they felt benign and threat words relate to thirteen ambiguous scenarios. Results revealed that individuals with high PTSD symptoms (n = 64) rated threat words as significantly more related to ambiguous sentences than did worry/dysphoric (n = 68) or non-worry/non-dysphoric (n = 70) individuals. We also calculated an interpretation bias by subtracting the relatedness rating for threat words from the relatedness rating for benign words. Thus larger scores revealed a benign bias, or a tendency to endorse that benign words are more related to ambiguous scenarios than threat words. Due to the increased endorsement of threat words in the PTSD group, they displayed a significantly smaller benign bias benign bias than did the other two groups. Our results provide additional evidence for an interpretation bias in individuals experiencing PTSD symptoms, as well as suggest possible implications for the distinction of benign and threat components in cognitive models of PTSD. Furthermore, the current study serves as preliminary evidence of the usefulness of the Word-Sentence Association Paradigm for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (WSAPTSD) as a brief symptom measure for PTSD.
ISBN: 9781321604641Subjects--Topical Terms:
524863
Clinical psychology.
A measure of interpretation bias in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
LDR
:02549nmm a2200277 4500
001
2063531
005
20151028113913.5
008
170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781321604641
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI1584946
035
$a
AAI1584946
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Boffa, Joseph William, III.
$3
3178050
245
1 2
$a
A measure of interpretation bias in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
300
$a
27 p.
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-03.
500
$a
Adviser: Nader Amir.
502
$a
Thesis (M.A.)--San Diego State University, 2015.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
Researchers have developed methods of measuring interpretation of ambiguous situations in anxious individuals. However, to our knowledge, no measure exists that would allow the examination of benign (i.e., non-threatening) and threat interpretations in individuals with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The present study outlines the development and validation of such a measure. Using a word-sentence association paradigm (e.g., WSAP,) 202 individuals provided ratings of how well they felt benign and threat words relate to thirteen ambiguous scenarios. Results revealed that individuals with high PTSD symptoms (n = 64) rated threat words as significantly more related to ambiguous sentences than did worry/dysphoric (n = 68) or non-worry/non-dysphoric (n = 70) individuals. We also calculated an interpretation bias by subtracting the relatedness rating for threat words from the relatedness rating for benign words. Thus larger scores revealed a benign bias, or a tendency to endorse that benign words are more related to ambiguous scenarios than threat words. Due to the increased endorsement of threat words in the PTSD group, they displayed a significantly smaller benign bias benign bias than did the other two groups. Our results provide additional evidence for an interpretation bias in individuals experiencing PTSD symptoms, as well as suggest possible implications for the distinction of benign and threat components in cognitive models of PTSD. Furthermore, the current study serves as preliminary evidence of the usefulness of the Word-Sentence Association Paradigm for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (WSAPTSD) as a brief symptom measure for PTSD.
590
$a
School code: 0220.
650
4
$a
Clinical psychology.
$3
524863
690
$a
0622
710
2
$a
San Diego State University.
$b
Psychology.
$3
2104190
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
54-03(E).
790
$a
0220
791
$a
M.A.
792
$a
2015
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1584946
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9296189
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入