語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
到查詢結果
[ subject:"Chemistry, General." ]
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Classification of chemical substance...
~
Stains, Marilyne Nicole Olivia.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Classification of chemical substances, reactions, and interactions: The effect of expertise.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Classification of chemical substances, reactions, and interactions: The effect of expertise./
作者:
Stains, Marilyne Nicole Olivia.
面頁冊數:
169 p.
附註:
Adviser: Vicente A. Talanquer.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International68-03B.
標題:
Chemistry, General. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3255658
Classification of chemical substances, reactions, and interactions: The effect of expertise.
Stains, Marilyne Nicole Olivia.
Classification of chemical substances, reactions, and interactions: The effect of expertise.
- 169 p.
Adviser: Vicente A. Talanquer.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2007.
This project explored the strategies that undergraduate and graduate chemistry students engaged in when solving classification tasks involving microscopic (particulate) representations of chemical substances and microscopic and symbolic representations of different chemical reactions. We were specifically interested in characterizing the basic features to which students pay attention while classifying, identifying the patterns of reasoning that they follow, and comparing the performance of students with different levels of preparation in the discipline. In general, our results suggest that advanced levels of expertise in chemical classification do not necessarily evolve in a linear and continuous way with academic training. Novice students had a tendency to reduce the cognitive demand of the task and rely on common-sense reasoning; they had difficulties differentiating concepts (conceptual undifferentiation) and based their classification decisions on only one variable (reduction). These ways of thinking lead them to consider extraneous features, pay more attention to explicit or surface features than implicit features and to overlook important and relevant features. However, unfamiliar levels of representations (microscopic level) seemed to trigger deeper and more meaningful thinking processes. On the other hand, expert students classified entities using a specific set of rules that they applied throughout the classification tasks. They considered a larger variety of implicit features and the unfamiliarity with the microscopic level of representation did not affect their reasoning processes. Consequently, novices created numerous small groups, few of them being chemically meaningful, while experts created few but large chemically meaningful groups. Novices also had difficulties correctly classifying entities in chemically meaningful groups. Finally, expert chemists in our study used classification schemes that are not necessarily traditionally taught in classroom chemistry (e.g. the structure of substances is more relevant to them than their composition when classifying substances as compounds or elements). This result suggests that practice in the field may develop different types of knowledge framework than those usually presented in chemistry textbooks.Subjects--Topical Terms:
1021807
Chemistry, General.
Classification of chemical substances, reactions, and interactions: The effect of expertise.
LDR
:03176nam 2200265 a 45
001
942864
005
20110520
008
110520s2007 eng d
035
$a
(UMI)AAI3255658
035
$a
AAI3255658
040
$a
UMI
$c
UMI
100
1
$a
Stains, Marilyne Nicole Olivia.
$3
1266895
245
1 0
$a
Classification of chemical substances, reactions, and interactions: The effect of expertise.
300
$a
169 p.
500
$a
Adviser: Vicente A. Talanquer.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-03, Section: B, page: 1605.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2007.
520
$a
This project explored the strategies that undergraduate and graduate chemistry students engaged in when solving classification tasks involving microscopic (particulate) representations of chemical substances and microscopic and symbolic representations of different chemical reactions. We were specifically interested in characterizing the basic features to which students pay attention while classifying, identifying the patterns of reasoning that they follow, and comparing the performance of students with different levels of preparation in the discipline. In general, our results suggest that advanced levels of expertise in chemical classification do not necessarily evolve in a linear and continuous way with academic training. Novice students had a tendency to reduce the cognitive demand of the task and rely on common-sense reasoning; they had difficulties differentiating concepts (conceptual undifferentiation) and based their classification decisions on only one variable (reduction). These ways of thinking lead them to consider extraneous features, pay more attention to explicit or surface features than implicit features and to overlook important and relevant features. However, unfamiliar levels of representations (microscopic level) seemed to trigger deeper and more meaningful thinking processes. On the other hand, expert students classified entities using a specific set of rules that they applied throughout the classification tasks. They considered a larger variety of implicit features and the unfamiliarity with the microscopic level of representation did not affect their reasoning processes. Consequently, novices created numerous small groups, few of them being chemically meaningful, while experts created few but large chemically meaningful groups. Novices also had difficulties correctly classifying entities in chemically meaningful groups. Finally, expert chemists in our study used classification schemes that are not necessarily traditionally taught in classroom chemistry (e.g. the structure of substances is more relevant to them than their composition when classifying substances as compounds or elements). This result suggests that practice in the field may develop different types of knowledge framework than those usually presented in chemistry textbooks.
590
$a
School code: 0009.
650
4
$a
Chemistry, General.
$3
1021807
650
4
$a
Education, Sciences.
$3
1017897
690
$a
0485
690
$a
0714
710
2 0
$a
The University of Arizona.
$3
1017508
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
68-03B.
790
$a
0009
790
1 0
$a
Talanquer, Vicente A.,
$e
advisor
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2007
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3255658
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9112506
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB W9112506
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入