東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Agriculture- Origin." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Against the grain : = a deep history...

Scott, James C.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Against the grain : = a deep history of the earliest states /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Against the grain :/ James C. Scott.
其他題名:	a deep history of the earliest states /
作者:	Scott, James C.
出版者:	New Haven :Yale University Press, : 2017.,
面頁冊數:	xvii, 312 p. :ill., maps ;21 cm.
標題:	Agriculture - Origin. -
ISBN:	9780300240214

Against the grain : = a deep history of the earliest states /
Scott, James C.

Against the grain :a deep history of the earliest states /James C. Scott. - New Haven :Yale University Press,2017. - xvii, 312 p. :ill., maps ;21 cm. - Yale agrarian studies. - Yale agrarian studies..

Includes bibliographical references (p. 279-300) and index.

An account of all the new and surprising evidence now available for the beginnings of the earliest civilizations that contradict the standard narrative. Why did humans abandon hunting and gathering for sedentary communities dependent on livestock and cereal grains, and governed by precursors of today's states? Most people believe that plant and animal domestication allowed humans, finally, to settle down and form agricultural villages, towns, and states, which made possible civilization, law, public order, and a presumably secure way of living. But archaeological and historical evidence challenges this narrative. The first agrarian states, says James C. Scott, were born of accumulations of domestications: first fire, then plants, livestock, subjects of the state, captives, and finally women in the patriarchal family-all of which can be viewed as a way of gaining control over reproduction. Scott explores why we avoided sedentism and plow agriculture, the advantages of mobile subsistence, the unforeseeable disease epidemics arising from crowding plants, animals, and grain, and why all early states are based on millets and cereal grains and unfree labor. He also discusses the "barbarians" who long evaded state control, as a way of understanding continuing tension between states and nonsubject peoples.

ISBN: 9780300240214US18.00

LCCN: 2016960155Subjects--Topical Terms:

1560057
Agriculture
--Origin.

LC Class. No.: GN799.A4 / S285 2017

Against the grain : = a deep history of the earliest states /
LDR:02059cam a2200217 a 4500 001 2194263
005 20200818093153.0
008 200602s2017 ctuab b 001 0 eng d
010 $a 2016960155
020 $a 9780300240214 $q (pbk.) : $c US18.00
020 $a 9780300182910
020 $a 0300182910
035 $a (OCoLC)ocn990684513
040 $a ERASA $b eng $c ERASA $d IOG $d OCLCO $d ZQP $d GSU $d GL4 $d YDX $d CLE $d VA@ $d COD $d DLC
042 $a lccopycat
050 0 0 $a GN799.A4 $b S285 2017
100 1 $a Scott, James C. $3 586372
245 1 0 $a Against the grain : $b a deep history of the earliest states / $c James C. Scott.
260 # $a New Haven : $b Yale University Press, $c 2017.
300 $a xvii, 312 p. : $b ill., maps ; $c 21 cm.
490 1 $a Yale agrarian studies
504 $a Includes bibliographical references (p. 279-300) and index.
520 8 $a An account of all the new and surprising evidence now available for the beginnings of the earliest civilizations that contradict the standard narrative. Why did humans abandon hunting and gathering for sedentary communities dependent on livestock and cereal grains, and governed by precursors of today's states? Most people believe that plant and animal domestication allowed humans, finally, to settle down and form agricultural villages, towns, and states, which made possible civilization, law, public order, and a presumably secure way of living. But archaeological and historical evidence challenges this narrative. The first agrarian states, says James C. Scott, were born of accumulations of domestications: first fire, then plants, livestock, subjects of the state, captives, and finally women in the patriarchal family-all of which can be viewed as a way of gaining control over reproduction. Scott explores why we avoided sedentism and plow agriculture, the advantages of mobile subsistence, the unforeseeable disease epidemics arising from crowding plants, animals, and grain, and why all early states are based on millets and cereal grains and unfree labor. He also discusses the "barbarians" who long evaded state control, as a way of understanding continuing tension between states and nonsubject peoples.
650 # 0 $a Agriculture $x Origin. $3 1560057
650 # 0 $a Agriculture and state $x History. $3 3423492
650 # 0 $a Agriculture $x Social aspects $x History. $3 1575911
830 0 $a Yale agrarian studies. $3 999038