東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Nothing to hide : = the false tradeo...

Solove, Daniel J., (1972-)

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Nothing to hide : = the false tradeoff between privacy and security /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Nothing to hide :/ Daniel J. Solove.
其他題名:	the false tradeoff between privacy and security /
作者:	Solove, Daniel J.,
出版者:	New Haven [Conn.] :Yale University Press, : c2011.,
面頁冊數:	ix, 245 p. :ill. ;25 cm.
內容註:	The nothing-to-hide argument -- The all-or-nothing fallacy -- The danger of deference -- Why privacy isn't merely an individual right -- The pendulum argument -- The national-security argument -- The problem with dissolving the crime-espionage distinction -- The war-powers argument and the rule of law -- The Fourth Amendment and the secrecy paradigm -- The third party doctrine and digital dossiers -- The failure of looking for a reasonable expectation of privacy -- The suspicionless-searches argument -- Should we keep the exclusionary rule? -- The first amendment as criminal procedure -- Will repealing the Patriot Act restore our privacy? -- The law-and-technology problem and the leave-it-to-the-legislature argument -- Video surveillance and the no-privacy-in-public argument -- Should the government engage in data mining? -- The Luddite argument, the Titanic phenomenon, and the fix-a-problem strategy.
標題:	Privacy, Right of - United States. -
ISBN:	9780300172317 (hbk.) :

Nothing to hide : = the false tradeoff between privacy and security /
Solove, Daniel J.,1972-

Nothing to hide :the false tradeoff between privacy and security /Daniel J. Solove. - New Haven [Conn.] :Yale University Press,c2011. - ix, 245 p. :ill. ;25 cm.

Includes bibliographical references and indexes.

The nothing-to-hide argument -- The all-or-nothing fallacy -- The danger of deference -- Why privacy isn't merely an individual right -- The pendulum argument -- The national-security argument -- The problem with dissolving the crime-espionage distinction -- The war-powers argument and the rule of law -- The Fourth Amendment and the secrecy paradigm -- The third party doctrine and digital dossiers -- The failure of looking for a reasonable expectation of privacy -- The suspicionless-searches argument -- Should we keep the exclusionary rule? -- The first amendment as criminal procedure -- Will repealing the Patriot Act restore our privacy? -- The law-and-technology problem and the leave-it-to-the-legislature argument -- Video surveillance and the no-privacy-in-public argument -- Should the government engage in data mining? -- The Luddite argument, the Titanic phenomenon, and the fix-a-problem strategy.

ISBN: 9780300172317 (hbk.) :US25.00

LCCN: 2010049542Subjects--Topical Terms:

572012
Privacy, Right of
--United States.

LC Class. No.: KF1262 / .S663 2011

Dewey Class. No.: 342.7308/58

Nothing to hide : = the false tradeoff between privacy and security /
LDR:01781cam a2200289 a 4500 001 980705
003 OCoLC
005 20111012183632.0
008 111115s2011 ctua b 001 0 eng D
010 $a 2010049542
020 $a 9780300172317 (hbk.) : $c US25.00
020 $a 0300172311 (hbk.)
029 1 $a AU@ $b 000046270084
029 1 $a NZ1 $b 13673614
029 1 $a HEBIS $b 264169751
035 $a (OCoLC)670481512
035 $a CH-BW-100-03
040 $a DLC $c DLC $d YDX $d BTCTA $d YDXCP $d BWX $d CDX $d VP@ $d MIX
042 $a pcc
043 $a n-us---
049 $a FISA
050 0 0 $a KF1262 $b .S663 2011
082 0 0 $a 342.7308/58 $2 22
100 1 $a Solove, Daniel J., $d 1972- $3 759017
245 1 0 $a Nothing to hide : $b the false tradeoff between privacy and security / $c Daniel J. Solove.
260 # $a New Haven [Conn.] : $b Yale University Press, $c c2011.
300 $a ix, 245 p. : $b ill. ; $c 25 cm.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references and indexes.
505 0 # $a The nothing-to-hide argument -- The all-or-nothing fallacy -- The danger of deference -- Why privacy isn't merely an individual right -- The pendulum argument -- The national-security argument -- The problem with dissolving the crime-espionage distinction -- The war-powers argument and the rule of law -- The Fourth Amendment and the secrecy paradigm -- The third party doctrine and digital dossiers -- The failure of looking for a reasonable expectation of privacy -- The suspicionless-searches argument -- Should we keep the exclusionary rule? -- The first amendment as criminal procedure -- Will repealing the Patriot Act restore our privacy? -- The law-and-technology problem and the leave-it-to-the-legislature argument -- Video surveillance and the no-privacy-in-public argument -- Should the government engage in data mining? -- The Luddite argument, the Titanic phenomenon, and the fix-a-problem strategy.
650 # 0 $a Privacy, Right of $z United States. $3 572012
650 # 0 $a Law enforcement $z United States. $3 724412
650 # 0 $a National security $x Law and legislation $z United States. $3 902323