東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Immediate versus delayed feedback in...

Bolton, Amy Elizabeth.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Immediate versus delayed feedback in simulation-based training: Matching feedback delivery timing to the cognitive demands of the training exercise.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Immediate versus delayed feedback in simulation-based training: Matching feedback delivery timing to the cognitive demands of the training exercise./
Author:	Bolton, Amy Elizabeth.
Description:	212 p.
Notes:	Adviser: Clint A. Bowers.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-09B.
Subject:	Education, Educational Psychology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3233644
ISBN:	9780542867552

Immediate versus delayed feedback in simulation-based training: Matching feedback delivery timing to the cognitive demands of the training exercise.
Bolton, Amy Elizabeth.

Immediate versus delayed feedback in simulation-based training: Matching feedback delivery timing to the cognitive demands of the training exercise. - 212 p.

Adviser: Clint A. Bowers.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Central Florida, 2006.

Optimal delivery of instruction is both critical and challenging in dynamic, scenario-based training (SBT) computer simulations such as those used by the military. Tasks that human instructors must perform during these sorts of simulated training exercises can impose a heavy burden on them. Partially due to advances in the state-of-the-art in training technology and partially due to the military's desire to reduce the number of personnel required, it may be possible to support functions that overburdened instructors perform by automating much of the SBT process in a computer simulation. Unfortunately though, after more than 50 years of literature documenting research conducted in the area of training interventions, few empirically-supported guidelines have emerged to direct the choice and implementation of effective, automated training interventions.

ISBN: 9780542867552Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017560
Education, Educational Psychology.

Immediate versus delayed feedback in simulation-based training: Matching feedback delivery timing to the cognitive demands of the training exercise.
LDR:03501nam 2200337 a 45 001 972457
005 20110927
008 110927s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542867552
035 $a (UMI)AAI3233644
035 $a AAI3233644
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Bolton, Amy Elizabeth. $3 1296464
245 1 0 $a Immediate versus delayed feedback in simulation-based training: Matching feedback delivery timing to the cognitive demands of the training exercise.
300 $a 212 p.
500 $a Adviser: Clint A. Bowers.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-09, Section: B, page: 5448.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Central Florida, 2006.
520 $a Optimal delivery of instruction is both critical and challenging in dynamic, scenario-based training (SBT) computer simulations such as those used by the military. Tasks that human instructors must perform during these sorts of simulated training exercises can impose a heavy burden on them. Partially due to advances in the state-of-the-art in training technology and partially due to the military's desire to reduce the number of personnel required, it may be possible to support functions that overburdened instructors perform by automating much of the SBT process in a computer simulation. Unfortunately though, after more than 50 years of literature documenting research conducted in the area of training interventions, few empirically-supported guidelines have emerged to direct the choice and implementation of effective, automated training interventions.
520 $a The current study sought to provide empirical guidance for the optimal timing of feedback delivery (i.e., immediate vs. delayed) in a dynamic, SBT computer simulation. The premise of the investigation was that the demand for overall cognitive resources during the training exercise would prescribe the proper timing of feedback delivery. To test the hypotheses, 120 volunteers were randomly assigned to 10 experimental conditions. After familiarization on the experimental testbed, participants completed a total of seven, 10-minute scenarios, which were divided across two training phases. During each training phase participants would receive either immediate or delayed feedback and would perform either high or low cognitive load scenarios. Four subtask measures were recorded during test scenarios as well as subjective reports of mental demand, temporal demand and frustration. Instructional efficiency ratios were computed using both objective performance data and subjective reports of mental demand.
520 $a A series of planned comparisons were conducted to investigate the training effectiveness of differing scenario cognitive loads (low vs. high), timing of feedback delivery (immediate vs. delayed), and sequencing the timing of feedback delivery and the cognitive load of the scenario. In fact, the data did not support the hypotheses. Therefore, post hoc, exploratory data analyses were performed to determine if there were trends in the data that would inform future investigations. The results for these analyses are discussed with suggested directions for future research.
590 $a School code: 0705.
650 4 $a Education, Educational Psychology. $3 1017560
650 4 $a Education, Technology. $3 1017498
650 4 $a Military Studies. $3 1017606
650 4 $a Psychology, Cognitive. $3 1017810
650 4 $a Psychology, Experimental. $3 517106
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0623
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0750
710 2 0 $a University of Central Florida. $3 1018467
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-09B.
790 $a 0705
790 1 0 $a Bowers, Clint A., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3233644