東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

American pragmatism and democratic f...

Lacey, Robert J.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

American pragmatism and democratic faith.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	American pragmatism and democratic faith./
作者:	Lacey, Robert J.
面頁冊數:	352 p.
附註:	Adviser: Jerome M. Mileur.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-04A.
標題:	History, United States. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3212736
ISBN:	9780542629822

American pragmatism and democratic faith.
Lacey, Robert J.

American pragmatism and democratic faith. - 352 p.

Adviser: Jerome M. Mileur.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2006.

My dissertation is a study of the origins and legacy of participatory democratic thought in America. In June 1962, the Students for a Democratic Society signed the Port Huron Statement, in which they articulated their vision of citizens participating directly in the governance of their country and putting an end to many intractable problems in American life, including racial discrimination, poverty, and the paranoid logic of cold war policy (e.g., brinkmanship). The New Left ideal of participatory democracy captured the imagination of a generation of political activists in the late 1950s and early 1960s but never planted a firm foothold in American political soil. Largely dismissed as an unviable idea in such a large country, it had limited influence on the development of political institutions in the United States and would only receive serious consideration from political theorists. To understand why participatory democracy was so short-lived, I argue that one must trace its intellectual origins to the pragmatists who in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries laid the foundation for this ethos. Thus, I focus on the writings of the early pragmatist philosophers, including Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, and John Dewey. Next, I turn to the legacy of participatory democratic thought and examine the work of Sheldon Wolin and Benjamin Barber, two contemporary political theorists who, respectively, represent radical and mainstream versions of this idea. Finally, I argue that once situated within the pragmatist tradition, participatory democratic thought proves not only impracticable but also theoretically untenable. This might compel political scientists to revisit questions about participation, civic education, citizenship, civil society, and representation.

ISBN: 9780542629822Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017393
History, United States.

American pragmatism and democratic faith.
LDR:02664nam 2200277 a 45 001 972186
005 20110927
008 110927s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542629822
035 $a (UMI)AAI3212736
035 $a AAI3212736
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Lacey, Robert J. $3 1296203
245 1 0 $a American pragmatism and democratic faith.
300 $a 352 p.
500 $a Adviser: Jerome M. Mileur.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-04, Section: A, page: 1512.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2006.
520 $a My dissertation is a study of the origins and legacy of participatory democratic thought in America. In June 1962, the Students for a Democratic Society signed the Port Huron Statement, in which they articulated their vision of citizens participating directly in the governance of their country and putting an end to many intractable problems in American life, including racial discrimination, poverty, and the paranoid logic of cold war policy (e.g., brinkmanship). The New Left ideal of participatory democracy captured the imagination of a generation of political activists in the late 1950s and early 1960s but never planted a firm foothold in American political soil. Largely dismissed as an unviable idea in such a large country, it had limited influence on the development of political institutions in the United States and would only receive serious consideration from political theorists. To understand why participatory democracy was so short-lived, I argue that one must trace its intellectual origins to the pragmatists who in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries laid the foundation for this ethos. Thus, I focus on the writings of the early pragmatist philosophers, including Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, and John Dewey. Next, I turn to the legacy of participatory democratic thought and examine the work of Sheldon Wolin and Benjamin Barber, two contemporary political theorists who, respectively, represent radical and mainstream versions of this idea. Finally, I argue that once situated within the pragmatist tradition, participatory democratic thought proves not only impracticable but also theoretically untenable. This might compel political scientists to revisit questions about participation, civic education, citizenship, civil society, and representation.
590 $a School code: 0118.
650 4 $a History, United States. $3 1017393
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
690 $a 0337
690 $a 0615
710 2 0 $a University of Massachusetts Amherst. $3 1019433
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-04A.
790 $a 0118
790 1 0 $a Mileur, Jerome M., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3212736