東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Endangered species recovery.

Pagel, Joel E.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Endangered species recovery.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Endangered species recovery./
Author:	Pagel, Joel E.
Description:	103 p.
Notes:	Adviser: Mike Johnson.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-04B.
Subject:	Agriculture, Forestry and Wildlife. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3212874
ISBN:	9780542634956

Endangered species recovery.
Pagel, Joel E.

Endangered species recovery. - 103 p.

Adviser: Mike Johnson.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Davis, 2006.

Endangered species recovery is the end product in an arduous administrative and biological process to remove a United States federally listed species from Endangered Species Act protection. Few species have been delisted, putting into question the approach used to reclassify species, and associated recovery planning processes.

ISBN: 9780542634956Subjects--Topical Terms:

783690
Agriculture, Forestry and Wildlife.

Endangered species recovery.
LDR:02781nam 2200313 a 45 001 971572
005 20110927
008 110927s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542634956
035 $a (UMI)AAI3212874
035 $a AAI3212874
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Pagel, Joel E. $3 1295607
245 1 0 $a Endangered species recovery.
300 $a 103 p.
500 $a Adviser: Mike Johnson.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-04, Section: B, page: 1763.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Davis, 2006.
520 $a Endangered species recovery is the end product in an arduous administrative and biological process to remove a United States federally listed species from Endangered Species Act protection. Few species have been delisted, putting into question the approach used to reclassify species, and associated recovery planning processes.
520 $a Delisting culminates efforts to recover an endangered species. However, delisting has been rarely achieved due to persistence of causative factors that led to the original listing. In Doremus and Pagel (2001), we suggest that (a) delisting requires an analysis of regulatory protections that will remain after a species has been removed from protective lists, (b) lack of protection against the original causes of endangerment means most species will remain on the list, and (c) delisting should be undertaken with caution.
520 $a In Pagel, Clark and Rohlf (2005), we examine the interface between Sections 4, 7, 9 and 10 of the Endangered Species Act and how each part of the act addresses recovery. We conclude by recommending that (a) recovery standards and goals must be clearly defined by recovery proponents so that all entities work within the spirit and letter of the law; (b) endangered species recovery programs must be better integrated and applied throughout government programs; which may require additional legislation; and (c) academics, agencies and the public must all strive to eliminate the initial conditions that cause endangerment, and following delisting, must remain vigilant to prevent relisting.
520 $a Finally, I address the role of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act in supporting in situ recovery of listed species. The current role that Section 7 consultations play in endangered species recovery is questionable; however could be improved by linking recovery planning processes, critical habitat, and Section 7 consultations in future legislation.
590 $a School code: 0029.
650 4 $a Agriculture, Forestry and Wildlife. $3 783690
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0478
710 2 0 $a University of California, Davis. $3 1018682
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-04B.
790 $a 0029
790 1 0 $a Johnson, Mike, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3212874