東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Sensory integration during de-adapta...

King, Bradley R.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Sensory integration during de-adaptation to visuomotor distortions.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Sensory integration during de-adaptation to visuomotor distortions./
作者:	King, Bradley R.
面頁冊數:	67 p.
附註:	Adviser: Jane E. Clark.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International44-06.
標題:	Health Sciences, Recreation. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1436453
ISBN:	9780542731952

Sensory integration during de-adaptation to visuomotor distortions.
King, Bradley R.

Sensory integration during de-adaptation to visuomotor distortions. - 67 p.

Adviser: Jane E. Clark.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2006.

Previous research has demonstrated that adults can adapt to novel sensorimotor perturbations, a process thought to be achieved by the gradual update of an adaptive internal representation. However, few research studies have investigated the persistence of a newly acquired representation, as assessed by the reduction of performance errors after the perturbation has been removed (i.e., de-adaptation). The primary objective of this thesis was to determine if the central nervous system (CNS) could flexibly utilize visual and proprioceptive afference to de-adapt to novel sensorimotor perturbations. It has been previously demonstrated that the CNS relies more heavily on visual information for hand localization in the azimuthal direction whereas proprioception is more heavily weighted for hand localization in the radial direction. Seventy-two right-handed adults executed reaching movements during exposure to either an incremental visuomotor rotation or gain distortion. Visual feedback provided during post-exposure was manipulated. Results indicate that the CNS predominantly utilized visual afference to de-adapt to both perturbations, despite the fact that rotation adaptation resulted in movement errors in the azimuthal direction whereas gain adaptation resulted in movement extent errors. These data suggest that the CNS did not flexibly re-weight proprioceptive afference in the absence of visual feedback during a center-out drawing task.

ISBN: 9780542731952Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018003
Health Sciences, Recreation.

Sensory integration during de-adaptation to visuomotor distortions.
LDR:02309nam 2200277 a 45 001 969238
005 20110920
008 110921s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542731952
035 $a (UMI)AAI1436453
035 $a AAI1436453
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a King, Bradley R. $3 1293292
245 1 0 $a Sensory integration during de-adaptation to visuomotor distortions.
300 $a 67 p.
500 $a Adviser: Jane E. Clark.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 44-06, page: 2787.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2006.
520 $a Previous research has demonstrated that adults can adapt to novel sensorimotor perturbations, a process thought to be achieved by the gradual update of an adaptive internal representation. However, few research studies have investigated the persistence of a newly acquired representation, as assessed by the reduction of performance errors after the perturbation has been removed (i.e., de-adaptation). The primary objective of this thesis was to determine if the central nervous system (CNS) could flexibly utilize visual and proprioceptive afference to de-adapt to novel sensorimotor perturbations. It has been previously demonstrated that the CNS relies more heavily on visual information for hand localization in the azimuthal direction whereas proprioception is more heavily weighted for hand localization in the radial direction. Seventy-two right-handed adults executed reaching movements during exposure to either an incremental visuomotor rotation or gain distortion. Visual feedback provided during post-exposure was manipulated. Results indicate that the CNS predominantly utilized visual afference to de-adapt to both perturbations, despite the fact that rotation adaptation resulted in movement errors in the azimuthal direction whereas gain adaptation resulted in movement extent errors. These data suggest that the CNS did not flexibly re-weight proprioceptive afference in the absence of visual feedback during a center-out drawing task.
590 $a School code: 0117.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Recreation. $3 1018003
650 4 $a Psychology, Physiological. $3 1017869
690 $a 0575
690 $a 0989
710 2 0 $a University of Maryland, College Park. $3 657686
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 44-06.
790 $a 0117
790 1 0 $a Clark, Jane E., $e advisor
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1436453