東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Typical and atypical antipsychotics:...

Indiana University.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Typical and atypical antipsychotics: Relationships between rat in vivo dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy assessed using LC/MS and changes in neurochemistry and catalepsy.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Typical and atypical antipsychotics: Relationships between rat in vivo dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy assessed using LC/MS and changes in neurochemistry and catalepsy./
Author:	Barth, Vanessa Nicole.
Description:	135 p.
Notes:	Adviser: Jay R. Simon.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-08B.
Subject:	Biology, Neuroscience. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3230541
ISBN:	9780542847844

Typical and atypical antipsychotics: Relationships between rat in vivo dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy assessed using LC/MS and changes in neurochemistry and catalepsy.
Barth, Vanessa Nicole.

Typical and atypical antipsychotics: Relationships between rat in vivo dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy assessed using LC/MS and changes in neurochemistry and catalepsy. - 135 p.

Adviser: Jay R. Simon.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2006.

Typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs are similar in that both posses affinity for the dopamine D2 receptor; however, they differ in their propensity to induce extrapyramidal side effects and hyperprolactinemia. Despite additional activities at other dopamine receptor sub-types and transmitter systems, atypicals are less likely to induce EPS or hyperprolactinemia. The application of in vivo receptor occupancy coupled to neurochemical and behavioral measures from the same animals has led to increased predictive validation of an acute rodent model of EPS---the bar test. The clinical relationship of greater than 80% D2 occupancy resulting in EPS as determined by PET is similar to that assessed in rats utilizing LC/MS/MS to assess D 2 occupancy. In parallel, from the same set of animals, it was determined that 50% D2 receptor occupancy led to a doubling in rat striatal DOPAC levels---a traditional consequence of D2 antagonism. Additionally, it was observed that typical and atypical antipsychotics differ with atypical antipsychotics plateauing at a significantly lower dopamine D2 occupancy than the dopamine occupancy achieved by typical antipsychotics. The occupancy plateau achieved by typical antipsychotics was not significantly different from 100% whereas atypicals plateaued at an occupancy value significantly lower than 100%. Central serotonin 2a antagonism does not appear to be responsible for this observation since an atypical receptor occupancy profile was not seen after co-administration of MDL 100907 with haloperidol. Atypicals also displayed a wider dose range where high levels of D2 receptor occupancy at or above 80% were seen without appreciable catalepsy, despite the presence of increasing brain drug levels. This suggests that atypicals require additional compound in the brain as well as 80% dopamine D2 receptor occupancy to elicit EPS. These findings could be seen to support the dopamine fast off-rate hypothesis of atypicality, proposed by Kapur (2000), providing a possible explanation for the diverging profiles detected in the in vivo D2 occupancy assay.

ISBN: 9780542847844Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017680
Biology, Neuroscience.

Typical and atypical antipsychotics: Relationships between rat in vivo dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy assessed using LC/MS and changes in neurochemistry and catalepsy.
LDR:03066nam 2200277 a 45 001 964060
005 20110901
008 110901s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542847844
035 $a (UMI)AAI3230541
035 $a AAI3230541
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Barth, Vanessa Nicole. $3 1287131
245 1 0 $a Typical and atypical antipsychotics: Relationships between rat in vivo dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy assessed using LC/MS and changes in neurochemistry and catalepsy.
300 $a 135 p.
500 $a Adviser: Jay R. Simon.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-08, Section: B, page: 4265.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2006.
520 $a Typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs are similar in that both posses affinity for the dopamine D2 receptor; however, they differ in their propensity to induce extrapyramidal side effects and hyperprolactinemia. Despite additional activities at other dopamine receptor sub-types and transmitter systems, atypicals are less likely to induce EPS or hyperprolactinemia. The application of in vivo receptor occupancy coupled to neurochemical and behavioral measures from the same animals has led to increased predictive validation of an acute rodent model of EPS---the bar test. The clinical relationship of greater than 80% D2 occupancy resulting in EPS as determined by PET is similar to that assessed in rats utilizing LC/MS/MS to assess D 2 occupancy. In parallel, from the same set of animals, it was determined that 50% D2 receptor occupancy led to a doubling in rat striatal DOPAC levels---a traditional consequence of D2 antagonism. Additionally, it was observed that typical and atypical antipsychotics differ with atypical antipsychotics plateauing at a significantly lower dopamine D2 occupancy than the dopamine occupancy achieved by typical antipsychotics. The occupancy plateau achieved by typical antipsychotics was not significantly different from 100% whereas atypicals plateaued at an occupancy value significantly lower than 100%. Central serotonin 2a antagonism does not appear to be responsible for this observation since an atypical receptor occupancy profile was not seen after co-administration of MDL 100907 with haloperidol. Atypicals also displayed a wider dose range where high levels of D2 receptor occupancy at or above 80% were seen without appreciable catalepsy, despite the presence of increasing brain drug levels. This suggests that atypicals require additional compound in the brain as well as 80% dopamine D2 receptor occupancy to elicit EPS. These findings could be seen to support the dopamine fast off-rate hypothesis of atypicality, proposed by Kapur (2000), providing a possible explanation for the diverging profiles detected in the in vivo D2 occupancy assay.
590 $a School code: 0093.
650 4 $a Biology, Neuroscience. $3 1017680
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Pharmacology. $3 1017717
690 $a 0317
690 $a 0419
710 2 0 $a Indiana University. $3 960096
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-08B.
790 $a 0093
790 1 0 $a Simon, Jay R., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3230541