東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Inadmissible evidence: Compliance a...

Noble, Anne P.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Inadmissible evidence: Compliance and correction.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Inadmissible evidence: Compliance and correction./
Author:	Noble, Anne P.
Description:	41 p.
Notes:	Adviser: Jeffrey Neuschatz.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International44-04.
Subject:	Law. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1432379
ISBN:	9780542555848

Inadmissible evidence: Compliance and correction.
Noble, Anne P.

Inadmissible evidence: Compliance and correction. - 41 p.

Adviser: Jeffrey Neuschatz.

Thesis (M.A.)--The University of Alabama in Huntsville, 2006.

The goal of this study was to extend previous research on judicial decision making to determine whether jurors selectively comply with instructions to disregard inadmissible testimony, and if so, whether judicial instructions that are supplemented with an explanation of why the testimony should be disregarded will mitigate selective compliance. Participants were asked to read a trial summary in which a critical piece of wiretap evidence was either ruled admissible or inadmissible. Furthermore, the judge either gave simple instructions or supplemented instructions which were designed to explain the importance of complying with the judge's instructions. The results of the study failed to support the original hypotheses that jurors participate in selective compliance and that supplemented instructions would mitigate this effect. A consistently high conviction rate was found across all conditions and the supplemented instructions served to have no effect or increase guilty verdicts in almost all conditions.

ISBN: 9780542555848Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

Inadmissible evidence: Compliance and correction.
LDR:01889nam 2200289 a 45 001 958563
005 20110704
008 110704s2006 eng d
020 $a 9780542555848
035 $a (UMI)AAI1432379
035 $a AAI1432379
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Noble, Anne P. $3 1282021
245 1 0 $a Inadmissible evidence: Compliance and correction.
300 $a 41 p.
500 $a Adviser: Jeffrey Neuschatz.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 44-04, page: 2013.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--The University of Alabama in Huntsville, 2006.
520 $a The goal of this study was to extend previous research on judicial decision making to determine whether jurors selectively comply with instructions to disregard inadmissible testimony, and if so, whether judicial instructions that are supplemented with an explanation of why the testimony should be disregarded will mitigate selective compliance. Participants were asked to read a trial summary in which a critical piece of wiretap evidence was either ruled admissible or inadmissible. Furthermore, the judge either gave simple instructions or supplemented instructions which were designed to explain the importance of complying with the judge's instructions. The results of the study failed to support the original hypotheses that jurors participate in selective compliance and that supplemented instructions would mitigate this effect. A consistently high conviction rate was found across all conditions and the supplemented instructions served to have no effect or increase guilty verdicts in almost all conditions.
590 $a School code: 0278.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Psychology, Experimental. $3 517106
650 4 $a Psychology, Social. $3 529430
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0623
710 2 $a The University of Alabama in Huntsville. $3 1017884
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 44-04.
790 $a 0278
790 1 0 $a Neuschatz, Jeffrey, $e advisor
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1432379