東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Negotiation as a context for learnin...

Linnell, Julian Darcy.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Negotiation as a context for learning syntax in a second language.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Negotiation as a context for learning syntax in a second language./
作者:	Linnell, Julian Darcy.
面頁冊數:	430 p.
附註:	Chair: Teresa Pica.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International56-08A.
標題:	Education, Language and Literature. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9543112

Negotiation as a context for learning syntax in a second language.
Linnell, Julian Darcy.

Negotiation as a context for learning syntax in a second language. - 430 p.

Chair: Teresa Pica.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 1995.

Evidence from a growing number of studies has revealed important contributions of a type of interaction identified as negotiation for the process of second language (L2) learning. To date, no research has examined whether negotiation could assist learning L2 syntax. The present study asked if negotiation could aid one process in learning L2 syntax known as syntacticization.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018115
Education, Language and Literature.

Negotiation as a context for learning syntax in a second language.
LDR:03320nam 2200325 a 45 001 956420
005 20110624
008 110624s1995 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI9543112
035 $a AAI9543112
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Linnell, Julian Darcy. $3 1279885
245 1 0 $a Negotiation as a context for learning syntax in a second language.
300 $a 430 p.
500 $a Chair: Teresa Pica.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 56-08, Section: A, page: 3036.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 1995.
520 $a Evidence from a growing number of studies has revealed important contributions of a type of interaction identified as negotiation for the process of second language (L2) learning. To date, no research has examined whether negotiation could assist learning L2 syntax. The present study asked if negotiation could aid one process in learning L2 syntax known as syntacticization.
520 $a The first research question addressed was: (1) To what extent are linguistic modifications during negotiation evidence of syntacticization? A second research interest focused on the effects of types of negotiation on syntacticization. Therefore, the second research question addressed was: (2) To what extent is there a differential effect for different types of negotiation moves on syntacticization? Previous research suggested that clarification signals during negotiation could elicit more linguistic modifications by learners than confirmation signals. Consequently, both types of negotiation move were investigated.
520 $a Research on L2 learning has also revealed that negotiation provides opportunities for learners to comprehend unfamiliar input, to produce modified output, to be given feedback, and to focus on form. Evidence suggests that if negotiation was intensified and if discourse was manipulated to focus on specific L2 features, then negotiation should affect syntacticization over time. This led to the third research question: (3) To what extent does negotiation affect syntacticization over time?.
520 $a A pretest-posttest-delayed posttest experimental design compared negotiation's potential to aid syntacticization among four groups of L2 learners. Experimental/control treatments were contained within ten sessions as learners participated in communication tasks with native speakers through computerized writing conferences.
520 $a Results indicated that: (1) learners who interacted could stimulate syntacticization and continue to syntacticize over time, but those who negotiated accelerated the process over a short period, (2) syntacticization was not contingent on type of treatment, (3) syntacticization over short periods made no difference to group scores for pretest-posttest-delayed posttests targetting tense and aspect, and (4) clarification request signals during negotiation were significantly more effective for syntacticization than confirmation checks over a short time, but not over a longer period.
590 $a School code: 0175.
650 4 $a Education, Language and Literature. $3 1018115
650 4 $a Language, General. $3 1018089
650 4 $a Language, Linguistics. $3 1018079
690 $a 0279
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0679
710 2 $a University of Pennsylvania. $3 1017401
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 56-08A.
790 $a 0175
790 1 0 $a Pica, Teresa, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1995
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9543112