東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Gene patents: History, effects, and...

Chappelle, Amelia.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Gene patents: History, effects, and the question of propriety.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Gene patents: History, effects, and the question of propriety./
作者:	Chappelle, Amelia.
面頁冊數:	29 p.
附註:	Adviser: Peter Arno.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International45-05.
標題:	Biology, Genetics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1442033

Gene patents: History, effects, and the question of propriety.
Chappelle, Amelia.

Gene patents: History, effects, and the question of propriety. - 29 p.

Adviser: Peter Arno.

Thesis (M.S.)--Sarah Lawrence College, 2007.

For centuries, patents have served as an economic incentive for promoting research and development by conferring time-limited exclusive rights. The history of biotechnology patents, and more specifically, patents related to genetics is relatively recent. Both case law and legislation have shaped the direction of gene patents. Concerns about how gene patents affect research and patient care have surfaced. Limited studies have shown that gene patents may have a slight negative impact on research and perhaps a more substantial impact on patient care, however further investigation in both these areas is needed. The more fundamental question concerning the utility of patents for genetic research should be examined. In order for genetic discoveries to most benefit the public good, traditional gene patent policy needs to be greatly reformed in any number of suggested manners or perhaps even abolished.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017730
Biology, Genetics.

Gene patents: History, effects, and the question of propriety.
LDR:01709nam 2200265 a 45 001 954704
005 20110622
008 110622s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI1442033
035 $a AAI1442033
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Chappelle, Amelia. $3 1278161
245 1 0 $a Gene patents: History, effects, and the question of propriety.
300 $a 29 p.
500 $a Adviser: Peter Arno.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 45-05, page: 2355.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Sarah Lawrence College, 2007.
520 $a For centuries, patents have served as an economic incentive for promoting research and development by conferring time-limited exclusive rights. The history of biotechnology patents, and more specifically, patents related to genetics is relatively recent. Both case law and legislation have shaped the direction of gene patents. Concerns about how gene patents affect research and patient care have surfaced. Limited studies have shown that gene patents may have a slight negative impact on research and perhaps a more substantial impact on patient care, however further investigation in both these areas is needed. The more fundamental question concerning the utility of patents for genetic research should be examined. In order for genetic discoveries to most benefit the public good, traditional gene patent policy needs to be greatly reformed in any number of suggested manners or perhaps even abolished.
590 $a School code: 0651.
650 4 $a Biology, Genetics. $3 1017730
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
690 $a 0369
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a Sarah Lawrence College. $3 1022439
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 45-05.
790 $a 0651
790 1 0 $a Arno, Peter, $e advisor
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1442033