東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Before the text: Phenomenology and ...

Graves, Adam John.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Before the text: Phenomenology and revelation.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Before the text: Phenomenology and revelation./
作者:	Graves, Adam John.
面頁冊數:	283 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-07, Section: A, page: 2986.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-07A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3271758
ISBN:	9780549117858

Before the text: Phenomenology and revelation.
Graves, Adam John.

Before the text: Phenomenology and revelation. - 283 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-07, Section: A, page: 2986.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2007.

This dissertation explores the relationship between phenomenology and revelation in the work of three major figures in twentieth-century continental philosophy: namely, Martin Heidegger, Jean-Luc Marion and Paul Ricoeur. Why have these leading phenomenologists insisted on employing the term revelation within their 'strictly' philosophical texts? How has this appropriation of an explicitly theological term altered the phenomenological enterprise itself---its methods, its aims, its self-understanding? How has phenomenological discourse, in turn, transformed the meaning of revelation? By focusing on the question of revelation and its deployment within phenomenological discourse, this work seeks to shed new light on what is now commonly referred to as the "theological turn" in phenomenology and, more generally, on the emergence of religious motifs within recent continental philosophy as a whole. Furthermore, it seeks to contribute to the understanding of the recent history of the concept of revelation itself. After a brief introduction to the so-called theological turn in phenomenology, it is argued that two very different manners of treating the phenomenon of revelation have emerged within the phenomenological movement (Chapter 1). The dominant approach (exhibited in the thought of the early Heidegger and throughout Marion's philosophical texts) is chiefly concerned with disclosing the fundamental structures of, or fundamental conditions for, any possible revelation. Chapters 2 and 3 are comprised of a series of close readings of Heidegger and Marion, where it is argued that their "radical" approach leads to a merely formal conception of revelation---one that is purged of its material contents and extricated from the historical and textual milieu of the Judeo-Christian heritage. Chapter 4 turns to the work of Ricoeur, whose "hermeneutical" phenomenology is presented as an important alternative to the "radical" approach of Heidegger and Marion. By incorporating a hermeneutical moment into his phenomenological enterprise, Ricoeur's work offers a conception of revelation that is attuned to its historical and textual character.

ISBN: 9780549117858Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.

Before the text: Phenomenology and revelation.
LDR:02949nam 2200265 a 45 001 949590
005 20110525
008 110525s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549117858
035 $a (UMI)AAI3271758
035 $a AAI3271758
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Graves, Adam John. $3 1272975
245 1 0 $a Before the text: Phenomenology and revelation.
300 $a 283 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-07, Section: A, page: 2986.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2007.
520 $a This dissertation explores the relationship between phenomenology and revelation in the work of three major figures in twentieth-century continental philosophy: namely, Martin Heidegger, Jean-Luc Marion and Paul Ricoeur. Why have these leading phenomenologists insisted on employing the term revelation within their 'strictly' philosophical texts? How has this appropriation of an explicitly theological term altered the phenomenological enterprise itself---its methods, its aims, its self-understanding? How has phenomenological discourse, in turn, transformed the meaning of revelation? By focusing on the question of revelation and its deployment within phenomenological discourse, this work seeks to shed new light on what is now commonly referred to as the "theological turn" in phenomenology and, more generally, on the emergence of religious motifs within recent continental philosophy as a whole. Furthermore, it seeks to contribute to the understanding of the recent history of the concept of revelation itself. After a brief introduction to the so-called theological turn in phenomenology, it is argued that two very different manners of treating the phenomenon of revelation have emerged within the phenomenological movement (Chapter 1). The dominant approach (exhibited in the thought of the early Heidegger and throughout Marion's philosophical texts) is chiefly concerned with disclosing the fundamental structures of, or fundamental conditions for, any possible revelation. Chapters 2 and 3 are comprised of a series of close readings of Heidegger and Marion, where it is argued that their "radical" approach leads to a merely formal conception of revelation---one that is purged of its material contents and extricated from the historical and textual milieu of the Judeo-Christian heritage. Chapter 4 turns to the work of Ricoeur, whose "hermeneutical" phenomenology is presented as an important alternative to the "radical" approach of Heidegger and Marion. By incorporating a hermeneutical moment into his phenomenological enterprise, Ricoeur's work offers a conception of revelation that is attuned to its historical and textual character.
590 $a School code: 0175.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Religion, Philosophy of. $3 1017774
650 4 $a Theology. $3 516533
690 $a 0322
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0469
710 2 $a University of Pennsylvania. $3 1017401
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-07A.
790 $a 0175
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3271758