東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Professional accreditation of allied...

Bauer, Sally McLaughlin.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Professional accreditation of allied health programs: Reasons for participation by external evaluators.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Professional accreditation of allied health programs: Reasons for participation by external evaluators./
Author:	Bauer, Sally McLaughlin.
Description:	137 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 58-02, Section: A, page: 0395.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International58-02A.
Subject:	Education, Administration. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9721803
ISBN:	9780591304985

Professional accreditation of allied health programs: Reasons for participation by external evaluators.
Bauer, Sally McLaughlin.

Professional accreditation of allied health programs: Reasons for participation by external evaluators. - 137 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 58-02, Section: A, page: 0395.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Albany, 1996.

Subjects for the study are 505 external evaluators. The total response rate was 69% (N = 348).

ISBN: 9780591304985Subjects--Topical Terms:

626645
Education, Administration.

Professional accreditation of allied health programs: Reasons for participation by external evaluators.
LDR:03549nam 2200313 a 45 001 942623
005 20110519
008 110519s1996 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780591304985
035 $a (UMI)AAI9721803
035 $a AAI9721803
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Bauer, Sally McLaughlin. $3 1266727
245 1 0 $a Professional accreditation of allied health programs: Reasons for participation by external evaluators.
300 $a 137 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 58-02, Section: A, page: 0395.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Albany, 1996.
520 $a Subjects for the study are 505 external evaluators. The total response rate was 69% (N = 348).
520 $a The purpose of this study is to expand the literature on accreditation. The study uses a correlational research design to identify: (1) the major underlying factors for participation in accreditation, (2) the relationship between the personal and professional characteristics of external evaluators and their reasons for participation, and (3) the relationship between the reasons for participation and the perceived importance of information sources. Reasons for participation are operationally defined to reflect factors identified in the Participation Reason Scale (Grotelueschen, 1985). Accreditation decision making information includes the five major information sources available to external reviewers.
520 $a The factor analysis on the PRS resulted in six reasons for participation: (1) Professional Development and Improvement, (2) Improvement of Professional Service to Patients, (3) Personal Benefit and Professional Capacity, (4) Professional Commitment, (5) Collegial Learning and Interaction, and (6) Maintenance of Professional Role and Abilities.
520 $a Multivariate multiple regression analyses showed: (1) experience as an external evaluator and number of years in an educational program are negatively related to Personal Benefit and Professional Capacity, (2) external evaluators' perception of their primary role during the accreditation process is significantly related to Personal Benefit and Professional Capacity, (3) participation for Professional Development and Improvement is related to a preference for the generalized sources of information from on-site documents and discussion with team members, and to specific sources of self-study information connected to student issues, curriculum issues, and program evaluation activities, (4) participation to Improve Professional Service to Patients is related to curriculum issues contained in the self-study document, (5) participation for Collegial Learning and Interaction is related to a preference for on-site documents and interviews with site personnel, and to faculty issues and program evaluation activities, (6) participation to Maintain Professional Role and Abilities was related to discussion with site team members and to faculty issues.
520 $a Implications for theory and practice suggest the use of accreditation related activities for better defining and studying participatory approaches to evaluation. Utilization of information from accreditation should be pursued from the standpoint that there may be considerable diffusion of information across programs.
590 $a School code: 0668.
650 4 $a Education, Administration. $3 626645
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Education. $3 1017921
690 $a 0350
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a State University of New York at Albany. $3 769258
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 58-02A.
790 $a 0668
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1996
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9721803