東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Child sexual abuse: Conflicting con...

Mildred, Jane.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Child sexual abuse: Conflicting constructions, contested claims.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Child sexual abuse: Conflicting constructions, contested claims./
Author:	Mildred, Jane.
Description:	341 p.
Notes:	Chairs: Kathleen Coulborn Faller; Mayer N. Zald.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International62-01A.
Subject:	Social Work. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3001014
ISBN:	0493096825

Child sexual abuse: Conflicting constructions, contested claims.
Mildred, Jane.

Child sexual abuse: Conflicting constructions, contested claims. - 341 p.

Chairs: Kathleen Coulborn Faller; Mayer N. Zald.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2001.

Whether they address the “who did what to whom” of a specific case or debate more academic issues such as adult memory or children's suggestibility, contemporary conflicts around child sexual abuse have generally focused on contested “facts.” Little attention has been paid to the larger sociopolitical contexts surrounding these debates. This dissertation research examines controversies around child sexual abuse from a sociological perspective and uses sociological theory to examine some of the interests, positions, constituencies, and social conditions reflected in contemporary conflicts and claimsmaking around child sexual abuse. Forty well-known authorities on issues related to child sexual abuse were interviewed for the study and asked to discuss what they believe some of the contested issues around child sexual abuse are and what they might represent. The interview materials support the perception that there are two fairly well-defined camps of opinion on many of the issues surrounding child sexual abuse, but they also suggests that there are important differences of opinion within as well as between groups. Some of these intra- and inter-group involve disagreements about “what the research says,” but others involve moral and political issues that are unlikely to be resolved scientifically. Since conflicts around child sexual abuse appear to be connected to other, larger, concerns about the stability of the family, gender conflicts, the “science wars,” and the role of government, an over-reliance on the kinds of questions that can be addressed using quantitative methods may have allowed the conversation around what to do about adult/child sexual behavior to become overly narrow.

ISBN: 0493096825Subjects--Topical Terms:

617587
Social Work.

Child sexual abuse: Conflicting constructions, contested claims.
LDR:02741nam 2200313 a 45 001 938144
005 20110511
008 110511s2001 eng d
020 $a 0493096825
035 $a (UnM)AAI3001014
035 $a AAI3001014
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Mildred, Jane. $3 1261994
245 1 0 $a Child sexual abuse: Conflicting constructions, contested claims.
300 $a 341 p.
500 $a Chairs: Kathleen Coulborn Faller; Mayer N. Zald.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-01, Section: A, page: 0331.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2001.
520 $a Whether they address the “who did what to whom” of a specific case or debate more academic issues such as adult memory or children's suggestibility, contemporary conflicts around child sexual abuse have generally focused on contested “facts.” Little attention has been paid to the larger sociopolitical contexts surrounding these debates. This dissertation research examines controversies around child sexual abuse from a sociological perspective and uses sociological theory to examine some of the interests, positions, constituencies, and social conditions reflected in contemporary conflicts and claimsmaking around child sexual abuse. Forty well-known authorities on issues related to child sexual abuse were interviewed for the study and asked to discuss what they believe some of the contested issues around child sexual abuse are and what they might represent. The interview materials support the perception that there are two fairly well-defined camps of opinion on many of the issues surrounding child sexual abuse, but they also suggests that there are important differences of opinion within as well as between groups. Some of these intra- and inter-group involve disagreements about “what the research says,” but others involve moral and political issues that are unlikely to be resolved scientifically. Since conflicts around child sexual abuse appear to be connected to other, larger, concerns about the stability of the family, gender conflicts, the “science wars,” and the role of government, an over-reliance on the kinds of questions that can be addressed using quantitative methods may have allowed the conversation around what to do about adult/child sexual behavior to become overly narrow.
590 $a School code: 0127.
650 4 $a Social Work. $3 617587
650 4 $a Sociology, Criminology and Penology. $3 1017569
650 4 $a Sociology, Theory and Methods. $3 626625
650 4 $a Women's Studies. $3 1017481
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0452
690 $a 0453
690 $a 0627
710 2 0 $a University of Michigan. $3 777416
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 62-01A.
790 $a 0127
790 1 0 $a Faller, Kathleen Coulborn, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Zald, Mayer N., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2001
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3001014