東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Husserl viator: Metaphysical reflect...

Cubbage, Norman Brian.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Husserl viator: Metaphysical reflection in Edmund Husserl's phenomenology (Martin Heidegger, Eugen Fink).

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Husserl viator: Metaphysical reflection in Edmund Husserl's phenomenology (Martin Heidegger, Eugen Fink)./
Author:	Cubbage, Norman Brian.
Description:	376 p.
Notes:	Advisers: Douglas R. Anderson; Richard A. Lee, Jr.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-09A
Subject:	Philosophy -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3064903
ISBN:	0493845682

Husserl viator: Metaphysical reflection in Edmund Husserl's phenomenology (Martin Heidegger, Eugen Fink).
Cubbage, Norman Brian.

Husserl viator: Metaphysical reflection in Edmund Husserl's phenomenology (Martin Heidegger, Eugen Fink). - 376 p.

Advisers: Douglas R. Anderson; Richard A. Lee, Jr.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Pennsylvania State University, 2002.

I argue that Edmund Husserl's phenomenology maintains a substantive relationship to the metaphysical tradition in Western philosophy. I also argue that it offers resources for philosophical thought that seeks to recover the insights of that tradition from contemporary dismissals.

ISBN: 0493845682Subjects--Topical Terms:

550317
Philosophy

Husserl viator: Metaphysical reflection in Edmund Husserl's phenomenology (Martin Heidegger, Eugen Fink).
LDR:03448nam 2200325 a 45 001 936676
005 20110510
008 110510s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493845682
035 $a (UnM)AAI3064903
035 $a AAI3064903
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Cubbage, Norman Brian. $3 1260486
245 1 0 $a Husserl viator: Metaphysical reflection in Edmund Husserl's phenomenology (Martin Heidegger, Eugen Fink).
300 $a 376 p.
500 $a Advisers: Douglas R. Anderson; Richard A. Lee, Jr.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-09, Section: A, page: 3221.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Pennsylvania State University, 2002.
520 $a I argue that Edmund Husserl's phenomenology maintains a substantive relationship to the metaphysical tradition in Western philosophy. I also argue that it offers resources for philosophical thought that seeks to recover the insights of that tradition from contemporary dismissals.
520 $a In Part One, I claim that metaphysical philosophy is characterized by two orders of philosophical reflection and their interrelationship. Metaphysical philosophy is not simply an ontology of entities (first-order reflection), but is also concerned with the conditions under which such an account emerges in our experience (second-order reflection), as well as the relationship both kinds of reflection bear to our action (ethical judgment). I discern a “classical” metaphysical project in Plato, Aristotle, and Aquinas before moving to René Descartes' transformation of it. In Descartes, I argue, we find the origins of modernity's negative reception of metaphysical philosophy in his narrow conception of second-order reflection.
520 $a In Part Two, I argue that Husserl's phenomenology represents an extreme attempt to think through the negative potential of Descartes' discovery of subjectivity by reflecting upon his radical doubt. In a discussion of spatial perception, eidetic predication, intersubjectivity, genetic phenomenological method, and Husserl's conception of God, I show that Husserl's phenomenological method is an attempt to recover the classical conception of second-order reflection. I also attempt to show that Husserl's metaphysical thinking lies in his analyses of synthesis in consciousness as it is accessible to present consciousness
520 $a In Part Three, I examine critiques of Husserl's phenomenology provided by Martin Heidegger and Eugen Fink. Both of these phenomenologists critique Husserl's attempt to invest synthesis with metaphysical significance. Heidegger suggests that all such syntheses are conditioned by the difference (and belonging together) of being and beings, a relationship that is never a synthetic act of consciousness. Fink argues that all such syntheses refer back to primal acts of synthesis that occur before reflection comes on the scene, and so reflection can only (re)construct them hypothetically. While both critiques have their merit, I argue that both also miss key elements of Husserl's analysis of synthesis and of phenomenal presence that are worthy of development
590 $a School code: 0176
650 $a Philosophy $3 550317
650 $a Theology $3 1260327
690 $a 042
690 $a 046
710 2 $a The Pennsylvania State University $3 1260256
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-09A
790 $a 017
790 1 $a Anderson, Douglas R., $e adviso
790 1 $a Lee, Richard A., Jr., $e adviso
791 $a Ph.D
792 $a 200
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3064903