Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
The body of Dasein: Heidegger's int...
~
Bowles, Brian Hansford.
Linked to FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
The body of Dasein: Heidegger's interpretation of Aristotelian pathos (Martin Heidegger).
Record Type:
Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
The body of Dasein: Heidegger's interpretation of Aristotelian pathos (Martin Heidegger)./
Author:
Bowles, Brian Hansford.
Description:
263 p.
Notes:
Director: Thomas Sheehan.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International63-01A
Subject:
Philosophy -
Online resource:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3039269
ISBN:
0493527710
The body of Dasein: Heidegger's interpretation of Aristotelian pathos (Martin Heidegger).
Bowles, Brian Hansford.
The body of Dasein: Heidegger's interpretation of Aristotelian pathos (Martin Heidegger).
- 263 p.
Director: Thomas Sheehan.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Loyola University of Chicago, 2002.
<?Pub Inc> This study develops a Heideggerian thesis on the significance of Dasein's bodiliness. In <italic>Grundbegriffe der aristotelischen Philosophie</italic> (Summer 1924), Heidegger claims that bodiliness secures the ground for the full being of the human. I situate this thesis squarely within <italic>die Sache selbst</italic> for Heidegger. <italic>Die Sache selbst</italic> concerns the issue of <italic>how being itself is engendered in human understanding </italic>. From as early as 1921, Heidegger explicitly understands his central topic in terms of <math> <f> <g>k</g><a><ac><g>i</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a><g>n</g><g>h</g> <g>s</g><g>i</g><g>v</g></f> </math>. That is, the emergence of being in conjunction with the ontological structure of the human being is ultimately intelligible as a kind of movement. The 1924 thesis makes sense ultimately insofar as bodiliness itself is understood as the ontological movement—the original being-moved or <math> <f> <g>p</g><a><ac><g>a</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a><g>q</g>o<g>v</g> </f> </math>—that allows entities to appear within the domain of human concerns. After examining Heidegger's retrieval of several key Aristotelian concepts (such as <math> <f> <hsp sp="0.167"><sup><hsp sp="0.167"><sup>,</sup></sup><hsp sp="-0.167"> <hsp sp="-0.167"><hsp sp="-0.167"><a><ac><g>3</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a> <g>c</g><g>3</g><g>i</g><g>n</g>,<hsp sp="0.212"><hsp sp="0.212"><sup> `</sup><hsp sp="-0.167"><hsp sp="-0.167"><hsp sp="-0.167"><g>h</g> <g>d</g>o<g>n</g><a><ac><g>h</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a>,<hsp sp="0.212"> <g>p</g><a><ac><g>a</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a><g>q</g>o<g>v</g> ,<hsp sp="0.212"><g>k</g><a><ac><g>i</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a> <g>n</g><g>h</g><g>s</g><g>i</g><g>v</g></f> </math>, and <math> <f> <g>s</g><g>t</g><a><ac><g>3</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a><g>r</g> <g>h</g><g>s</g><g>i</g><g>v</g></f> </math>), I interpret bodiliness as the always already operative (<italic> a priori</italic>) being-pulled-out-ahead-of-itself (being-moved or opened) by its own essential lack. Entities are first able to be present to Dasein <italic> because</italic> Dasein is opened in this way. Thus, bodiliness on my reading is <italic>die Sache selbst</italic>. My interpretation of Heidegger's thesis also forms the interpretive starting point for a rereading of <italic>Geworfenheit </italic> and <italic>Gewesenheit</italic> as concepts of bodiliness. As Dasein's original <math> <f> <g>p</g><a><ac><g>a</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a><g>q</g>o<g>v</g> </f> </math>, bodiliness in <italic>Sein und Zeit</italic> would go by the name <italic> die gewesene Geworfenheit</italic>: the <italic>a priori</italic> or always already operative thrown-open-ness that first allows being to emerge to human understanding
ISBN: 0493527710Subjects--Topical Terms:
550317
Philosophy
The body of Dasein: Heidegger's interpretation of Aristotelian pathos (Martin Heidegger).
LDR
:03644nam 2200265 a 45
001
936586
005
20110510
008
110510s2002 eng d
020
$a
0493527710
035
$a
(UnM)AAI3039269
035
$a
AAI3039269
040
$a
UnM
$c
UnM
100
1
$a
Bowles, Brian Hansford.
$3
1260298
245
1 0
$a
The body of Dasein: Heidegger's interpretation of Aristotelian pathos (Martin Heidegger).
300
$a
263 p.
500
$a
Director: Thomas Sheehan.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-01, Section: A, page: 0210.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Loyola University of Chicago, 2002.
520
$a
<?Pub Inc> This study develops a Heideggerian thesis on the significance of Dasein's bodiliness. In <italic>Grundbegriffe der aristotelischen Philosophie</italic> (Summer 1924), Heidegger claims that bodiliness secures the ground for the full being of the human. I situate this thesis squarely within <italic>die Sache selbst</italic> for Heidegger. <italic>Die Sache selbst</italic> concerns the issue of <italic>how being itself is engendered in human understanding </italic>. From as early as 1921, Heidegger explicitly understands his central topic in terms of <math> <f> <g>k</g><a><ac><g>i</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a><g>n</g><g>h</g> <g>s</g><g>i</g><g>v</g></f> </math>. That is, the emergence of being in conjunction with the ontological structure of the human being is ultimately intelligible as a kind of movement. The 1924 thesis makes sense ultimately insofar as bodiliness itself is understood as the ontological movement—the original being-moved or <math> <f> <g>p</g><a><ac><g>a</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a><g>q</g>o<g>v</g> </f> </math>—that allows entities to appear within the domain of human concerns. After examining Heidegger's retrieval of several key Aristotelian concepts (such as <math> <f> <hsp sp="0.167"><sup><hsp sp="0.167"><sup>,</sup></sup><hsp sp="-0.167"> <hsp sp="-0.167"><hsp sp="-0.167"><a><ac><g>3</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a> <g>c</g><g>3</g><g>i</g><g>n</g>,<hsp sp="0.212"><hsp sp="0.212"><sup> `</sup><hsp sp="-0.167"><hsp sp="-0.167"><hsp sp="-0.167"><g>h</g> <g>d</g>o<g>n</g><a><ac><g>h</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a>,<hsp sp="0.212"> <g>p</g><a><ac><g>a</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a><g>q</g>o<g>v</g> ,<hsp sp="0.212"><g>k</g><a><ac><g>i</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a> <g>n</g><g>h</g><g>s</g><g>i</g><g>v</g></f> </math>, and <math> <f> <g>s</g><g>t</g><a><ac><g>3</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a><g>r</g> <g>h</g><g>s</g><g>i</g><g>v</g></f> </math>), I interpret bodiliness as the always already operative (<italic> a priori</italic>) being-pulled-out-ahead-of-itself (being-moved or opened) by its own essential lack. Entities are first able to be present to Dasein <italic> because</italic> Dasein is opened in this way. Thus, bodiliness on my reading is <italic>die Sache selbst</italic>. My interpretation of Heidegger's thesis also forms the interpretive starting point for a rereading of <italic>Geworfenheit </italic> and <italic>Gewesenheit</italic> as concepts of bodiliness. As Dasein's original <math> <f> <g>p</g><a><ac><g>a</g></ac><ac>&d12;</ac></a><g>q</g>o<g>v</g> </f> </math>, bodiliness in <italic>Sein und Zeit</italic> would go by the name <italic> die gewesene Geworfenheit</italic>: the <italic>a priori</italic> or always already operative thrown-open-ness that first allows being to emerge to human understanding
590
$a
School code: 0112
650
$a
Philosophy
$3
550317
690
$a
042
710
2
$a
Loyola University of Chicago
$3
1260299
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
63-01A
790
$a
011
790
1
$a
Sheehan, Thomas,
$e
adviso
791
$a
Ph.D
792
$a
200
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3039269
based on 0 review(s)
Location:
ALL
電子資源
Year:
Volume Number:
Items
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Inventory Number
Location Name
Item Class
Material type
Call number
Usage Class
Loan Status
No. of reservations
Opac note
Attachments
W9107172
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB W9107172
一般使用(Normal)
On shelf
0
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login