東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The comparison of four models of mem...

Green, Bonnie Ann.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The comparison of four models of memory using confirmatory factor analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The comparison of four models of memory using confirmatory factor analysis./
作者:	Green, Bonnie Ann.
面頁冊數:	101 p.
附註:	Adviser: Susan E. Barrett.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-04B.
標題:	Psychology, Cognitive. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3048953
ISBN:	0493632808

The comparison of four models of memory using confirmatory factor analysis.
Green, Bonnie Ann.

The comparison of four models of memory using confirmatory factor analysis. - 101 p.

Adviser: Susan E. Barrett.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Lehigh University, 2002.

Confirmatory factor analysis proved to be a powerful tool for memory theory testing and theory building.

ISBN: 0493632808Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017810
Psychology, Cognitive.

The comparison of four models of memory using confirmatory factor analysis.
LDR:03098nam 2200325 a 45 001 932807
005 20110505
008 110505s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493632808
035 $a (UnM)AAI3048953
035 $a AAI3048953
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Green, Bonnie Ann. $3 1256550
245 1 0 $a The comparison of four models of memory using confirmatory factor analysis.
300 $a 101 p.
500 $a Adviser: Susan E. Barrett.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-04, Section: B, page: 2082.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Lehigh University, 2002.
520 $a Confirmatory factor analysis proved to be a powerful tool for memory theory testing and theory building.
520 $a Four theories of memory were modeled using confirmatory factor analysis. Squire's (1994), Johnson and Hirst's (1993) and Schacter and Tulving's (1994) theories were chosen as each represents a fairly detailed, and modelable, account of memory components. A fourth theory, the unitary theory of memory, which posits a single memory system, was modeled as a mathematical base for comparison. Data from nine tests designed to tap three types of memory (free recall, implicit category cued recall, implicit word fragment completion) were collected from undergraduate students to evaluate the models.
520 $a Four measures were used to evaluate each model. First, each model was evaluated as to how well the data fit the model. Second, critical parameters within each model were examined to see if they significantly improved the fit. Third, the model's ability to account for the variance within each test of memory was considered. Fourth, weaknesses within a model were identified through modification indices.
520 $a As expected, the unitary model provided a poor fit for the data, and the three remaining models performed relatively well, but there were critical differences. Specifically, although the model based on one interpretation of Squire's theory provided a moderately good fit to the data, it had difficulty accounting for the data from the conceptual implicit memory task. The Johnson and Hirst model also produced a relatively good fit but had difficulties in two areas. Tests of free recall did not add significantly to the models' fit, and the model failed to account for a substantial amount of variance associated with implicit category cued recall.
520 $a Unlike the other models, all critical parameters in the Schacter and Tulving model significantly added to the model's fit. Moreover, no additional theoretically relevant parameters could be added that would significantly improve the fit of the model. In sum, of the models tested, the model based on Schacter and Tulving's theory of memory best captures the results of the memory tasks used in this study.
590 $a School code: 0105.
650 4 $a Psychology, Cognitive. $3 1017810
650 4 $a Psychology, Experimental. $3 517106
690 $a 0623
690 $a 0633
710 2 0 $a Lehigh University. $3 515436
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-04B.
790 $a 0105
790 1 0 $a Barrett, Susan E., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3048953