東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

What 'can be said' about God? Wittg...

The Claremont Graduate University.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

What 'can be said' about God? Wittgenstein and Whitehead (Ludwig Wittgenstein, Alfred North Whitehead).

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	What 'can be said' about God? Wittgenstein and Whitehead (Ludwig Wittgenstein, Alfred North Whitehead)./
作者:	Ramal, Randy.
面頁冊數:	393 p.
附註:	Adviser: D. Z. Phillips.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-03A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3046818
ISBN:	0493608621

What 'can be said' about God? Wittgenstein and Whitehead (Ludwig Wittgenstein, Alfred North Whitehead).
Ramal, Randy.

What 'can be said' about God? Wittgenstein and Whitehead (Ludwig Wittgenstein, Alfred North Whitehead). - 393 p.

Adviser: D. Z. Phillips.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Claremont Graduate University, 2002.

In what sense does philosophy investigate the reality of God? The answers that Whitehead and Wittgenstein give to this question are the subject matter of this dissertation. I discuss their later views on the nature of philosophy and the implications of these views for philosophical problems that have relevance to religious questions. In particular, I discuss the old problem of the nature of reality and what that entails about the particular question of the reality of God. I also look at their views on philosophic method, the ramifications of these views for the question of the right method of approaching the question of God, and what they actually say about God.

ISBN: 0493608621Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.

What 'can be said' about God? Wittgenstein and Whitehead (Ludwig Wittgenstein, Alfred North Whitehead).
LDR:03258nam 2200301 a 45 001 932730
005 20110505
008 110505s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493608621
035 $a (UnM)AAI3046818
035 $a AAI3046818
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Ramal, Randy. $3 1256473
245 1 0 $a What 'can be said' about God? Wittgenstein and Whitehead (Ludwig Wittgenstein, Alfred North Whitehead).
300 $a 393 p.
500 $a Adviser: D. Z. Phillips.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-03, Section: A, page: 0999.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Claremont Graduate University, 2002.
520 $a In what sense does philosophy investigate the reality of God? The answers that Whitehead and Wittgenstein give to this question are the subject matter of this dissertation. I discuss their later views on the nature of philosophy and the implications of these views for philosophical problems that have relevance to religious questions. In particular, I discuss the old problem of the nature of reality and what that entails about the particular question of the reality of God. I also look at their views on philosophic method, the ramifications of these views for the question of the right method of approaching the question of God, and what they actually say about God.
520 $a My motto in this dissertation comes from Wittgenstein but I apply it equally to him and Whitehead: “Show me <italic>how</italic> you are searching and I will tell you <italic>what</italic> you are looking for.” I ask whether they advocate either an “underlaborer'” or a “master-science” conception of philosophy, the first depriving philosophy from having subject matters of its own, reducing it to a technique for solving problems in other disciplines, and the second turning it into a scientific discipline that competes with other sciences for a better interpretation of ‘reality’. And although I reach the conclusion that neither Whitehead nor Wittgenstein is an underlaborer or a master-scientist, major differences between them surface during the investigation. These differences relate to the questions as to whether metaphysics is a valid “grammar,” whether religion needs justification, and whether the logic of God's reality allows it to be characterized as a metaphysical reality.
520 $a My conclusion is that Wittgenstein's criticisms of metaphysics are applicable to Whitehead's version of it, and that certain defenders of Whitehead's metaphysics fail to defend it against those criticisms. I argue that Whitehead's metaphysics is a kind of first philosophy that sublimes the logic of religious belief, and that it is confused to expect it to offer justification for religion. The implication for God's reality is that Whitehead sublimes its logic when treating it as a metaphysical reality whereas Wittgenstein is correct to situate it within its religiously natural home.
590 $a School code: 0047.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Religion, Philosophy of. $3 1017774
690 $a 0322
690 $a 0422
710 2 0 $a The Claremont Graduate University. $3 1017403
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-03A.
790 $a 0047
790 1 0 $a Phillips, D. Z., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3046818