東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

To make America scientific: Science...

Jewett, Andrew John.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

To make America scientific: Science and democracy in American public culture, 1900--1950.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	To make America scientific: Science and democracy in American public culture, 1900--1950./
作者:	Jewett, Andrew John.
面頁冊數:	915 p.
附註:	Chair: David A. Hollinger.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-02A.
標題:	Education, History of. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3082244

To make America scientific: Science and democracy in American public culture, 1900--1950.
Jewett, Andrew John.

To make America scientific: Science and democracy in American public culture, 1900--1950. - 915 p.

Chair: David A. Hollinger.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2002.

Participants in contemporary public discourse routinely claim that early-twentieth-century American intellectuals, by adopting the practices, methods, and rhetorical style of science, abandoned their moral responsibility to society. I argue that today's scholars pay too much attention to individuals and institutions that sustain this narrative, ignoring those figures—particularly numerous in the interwar years—who believed that scientific thinking was a precondition for ethical social engagement. I demonstrate that between 1900 and 1950, prominent academic and public intellectuals invoked socially grounded, politically inflected definitions of science which built on an analogy between the production of scientific knowledge and the making of collective decisions in a republican polity. These “scientific republicans,” found throughout the disciplines and in the worlds of education, journalism, and government, believed that training the American population in the scientist's fabled independence of mind was the only way to maintain self-government in an industrially advanced nation. Mental independence was prerequisite to political independence, they thought, and the former was inextricably linked to science. By showing that the scientific republicans protested in vain against the institutions of science policy and technological innovation created during and after World War II by professionally oriented scientists, progressive industrialists, and stability-minded politicians and bureaucrats, I challenge the accounts of those scholars who indiscriminately blame all of the science enthusiasts of the early twentieth century for the military-industrial complex and the consumer-driven economy of the Cold War years. The scientific republicans of the interwar period envisaged something far different than the military-industrial state, but their hopes were never realized because American political discourse narrowed dramatically with the rise of domestic anticommunism. I maintain that contemporary critics of the university's social role would profit from a more sustained engagement with the vigorous but largely forgotten discourse on the social dimensions of knowledge which flourished in early-twentieth-century America.Subjects--Topical Terms:

599244
Education, History of.

To make America scientific: Science and democracy in American public culture, 1900--1950.
LDR:03173nam 2200277 a 45 001 931676
005 20110429
008 110429s2002 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3082244
035 $a AAI3082244
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Jewett, Andrew John. $3 1255253
245 1 0 $a To make America scientific: Science and democracy in American public culture, 1900--1950.
300 $a 915 p.
500 $a Chair: David A. Hollinger.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-02, Section: A, page: 0624.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2002.
520 $a Participants in contemporary public discourse routinely claim that early-twentieth-century American intellectuals, by adopting the practices, methods, and rhetorical style of science, abandoned their moral responsibility to society. I argue that today's scholars pay too much attention to individuals and institutions that sustain this narrative, ignoring those figures—particularly numerous in the interwar years—who believed that scientific thinking was a precondition for ethical social engagement. I demonstrate that between 1900 and 1950, prominent academic and public intellectuals invoked socially grounded, politically inflected definitions of science which built on an analogy between the production of scientific knowledge and the making of collective decisions in a republican polity. These “scientific republicans,” found throughout the disciplines and in the worlds of education, journalism, and government, believed that training the American population in the scientist's fabled independence of mind was the only way to maintain self-government in an industrially advanced nation. Mental independence was prerequisite to political independence, they thought, and the former was inextricably linked to science. By showing that the scientific republicans protested in vain against the institutions of science policy and technological innovation created during and after World War II by professionally oriented scientists, progressive industrialists, and stability-minded politicians and bureaucrats, I challenge the accounts of those scholars who indiscriminately blame all of the science enthusiasts of the early twentieth century for the military-industrial complex and the consumer-driven economy of the Cold War years. The scientific republicans of the interwar period envisaged something far different than the military-industrial state, but their hopes were never realized because American political discourse narrowed dramatically with the rise of domestic anticommunism. I maintain that contemporary critics of the university's social role would profit from a more sustained engagement with the vigorous but largely forgotten discourse on the social dimensions of knowledge which flourished in early-twentieth-century America.
590 $a School code: 0028.
650 4 $a Education, History of. $3 599244
650 4 $a History of Science. $3 896972
650 4 $a History, United States. $3 1017393
690 $a 0337
690 $a 0520
690 $a 0585
710 2 0 $a University of California, Berkeley. $3 687832
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-02A.
790 $a 0028
790 1 0 $a Hollinger, David A., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3082244