東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Small group discussions: What stude...

Hurley, Mary Ellen.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Small group discussions: What students really say when they talk about expository text.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Small group discussions: What students really say when they talk about expository text./
作者:	Hurley, Mary Ellen.
面頁冊數:	160 p.
附註:	Chair: Judith Diamondstone.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-05A.
標題:	Education, Community College. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3052725
ISBN:	0493675310

Small group discussions: What students really say when they talk about expository text.
Hurley, Mary Ellen.

Small group discussions: What students really say when they talk about expository text. - 160 p.

Chair: Judith Diamondstone.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick, 2002.

Sociocultural theory assumes that students will construct new meaning and develop new knowledge structures when working in a collaborative setting. A common form of such collaborative learning is small peer group discussion. Within community colleges, students who are required to take developmental reading courses to improve their level of academic literacy often participate in small group text-based discussions not only to develop a better understanding of content but also to appropriate the cognitive strategies necessary for understanding complex text.

ISBN: 0493675310Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018008
Education, Community College.

Small group discussions: What students really say when they talk about expository text.
LDR:03222nam 2200313 a 45 001 928723
005 20110426
008 110426s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493675310
035 $a (UnM)AAI3052725
035 $a AAI3052725
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Hurley, Mary Ellen. $3 1252188
245 1 0 $a Small group discussions: What students really say when they talk about expository text.
300 $a 160 p.
500 $a Chair: Judith Diamondstone.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-05, Section: A, page: 1768.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick, 2002.
520 $a Sociocultural theory assumes that students will construct new meaning and develop new knowledge structures when working in a collaborative setting. A common form of such collaborative learning is small peer group discussion. Within community colleges, students who are required to take developmental reading courses to improve their level of academic literacy often participate in small group text-based discussions not only to develop a better understanding of content but also to appropriate the cognitive strategies necessary for understanding complex text.
520 $a In this research, I examined what took place during a small text-based group discussion in a developmental reading class at a New Jersey community college to determine if there was any relationship between the discussion content and the content of the post-discussion written work of the students. Data collected included both written and oral texts of students. Students read assigned texts, wrote summaries and responses, participated in discussion groups, and rewrote summaries and responses after discussion. Written texts of students were analyzed for changes in meaning. Oral texts of discussion groups were analyzed for discourse strategies and discussion content.
520 $a Data analysis revealed that changes were evident in students' post summary writings as scores consistently improved as students incorporated new ideas into their summaries after discussions. However, no consistent patterns emerged in response writing, as scores remain unchanged or decreased in post-discussion response writings. Analysis of talk indicated that students were likely to stay on task and engage in academic talk, with high-level academic talk increasing during later discussion groups as students became more familiar with discourse strategies that make more focused discussions possible. When analyzing student contributions to talk, no clear pattern emerged that showed a relationship between contributions to discussion and improvement on post-writings. Students who made little or no contributions to the talk still showed improvements in their post-summary writings. Theoretical and pedagogical implications for me as a practitioner are discussed, and further research is recommended.
590 $a School code: 0190.
650 4 $a Education, Community College. $3 1018008
650 4 $a Education, Reading. $3 1017790
650 4 $a Speech Communication. $3 1017408
690 $a 0275
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0535
710 2 0 $a Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick. $3 1017590
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-05A.
790 $a 0190
790 1 0 $a Diamondstone, Judith, $e advisor
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3052725