東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Speech act theories of meaning.

Psomas, Patricia Noga.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Speech act theories of meaning.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Speech act theories of meaning./
Author:	Psomas, Patricia Noga.
Description:	139 p.
Notes:	Adviser: William P. Alston.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-03A.
Subject:	Language, General. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3046849
ISBN:	0493609180

Speech act theories of meaning.
Psomas, Patricia Noga.

Speech act theories of meaning. - 139 p.

Adviser: William P. Alston.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Syracuse University, 2002.

The bulk of my dissertation is a survey of current speech act theories of meaning. This provides the necessary background leading up to what I ultimately aim to show, which is that Searle is right in claiming that there is a connection between what a speaker means by what he says and what that which he says means in the language.

ISBN: 0493609180Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018089
Language, General.

Speech act theories of meaning.
LDR:02223nam 2200301 a 45 001 928464
005 20110426
008 110426s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493609180
035 $a (UnM)AAI3046849
035 $a AAI3046849
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Psomas, Patricia Noga. $3 1251925
245 1 0 $a Speech act theories of meaning.
300 $a 139 p.
500 $a Adviser: William P. Alston.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-03, Section: A, page: 0976.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Syracuse University, 2002.
520 $a The bulk of my dissertation is a survey of current speech act theories of meaning. This provides the necessary background leading up to what I ultimately aim to show, which is that Searle is right in claiming that there is a connection between what a speaker means by what he says and what that which he says means in the language.
520 $a I take it that one of the main problems of any account of meaning is that of how to combine the seemingly irreconcilable private psychological intentionality involved in a speaker meaning something by what she says with the equally important public aspect of linguistic meaning, i.e. the fact that a meaningful sentence is a sentence which means something in some language. So, I spend chapter One going over arguments that show intentions are not sufficient for meaning, and in chapters Two through Four (part of what I do) is examine various attempts (starting with Grice's revised account of meaning) to bring in this public aspect; whether it is to link it with the private intentional aspect or to confine it to sentence (rather than speaker) meaning. In chapter Five I distinguish the different types of speaker and utterance (or sentence) meaning that are in keeping with Searle's claim. And, finally, in distinguishing between speaker meaning and communication, I identify three different types of communication.
590 $a School code: 0659.
650 4 $a Language, General. $3 1018089
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Speech Communication. $3 1017408
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0679
710 2 0 $a Syracuse University. $3 1017440
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-03A.
790 $a 0659
790 1 0 $a Alston, William P., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3046849