東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

An intergroup perspective on gender ...

Hallett, Jennifer Sue.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An intergroup perspective on gender differences in interpretations of four language variables: Ambiguous refusals, back-channels, questions, and problem disclosures.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	An intergroup perspective on gender differences in interpretations of four language variables: Ambiguous refusals, back-channels, questions, and problem disclosures./
Author:	Hallett, Jennifer Sue.
Description:	184 p.
Notes:	Co-Chairs: James J. Bradac; Beth A. Le Poire.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-01A.
Subject:	Language, General. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3041228
ISBN:	0493545727

An intergroup perspective on gender differences in interpretations of four language variables: Ambiguous refusals, back-channels, questions, and problem disclosures.
Hallett, Jennifer Sue.

An intergroup perspective on gender differences in interpretations of four language variables: Ambiguous refusals, back-channels, questions, and problem disclosures. - 184 p.

Co-Chairs: James J. Bradac; Beth A. Le Poire.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Barbara, 2002.

The current paper argues that subtle differences in how men and women use language can cause misunderstandings. Research results on communication and gender have primarily focused on differences in encoding behavior between men and women and have been complex and inconsistent (see Simpkins-Bullock & Wildman, 1991). One potential explanation for this inconsistency is that the intergroup perspective has not been widely used to frame gender differences. An intergroup perspective is useful to understand gender differences because it incorporates both intercultural (Maltz & Borker, 1982) and dominance (Henley & Kramarae, 1991) issues, the two major frameworks currently used in cross-gender studies. Specifically, social identity theory was used to explore gender differences in perceptions of verbal messages.

ISBN: 0493545727Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018089
Language, General.

An intergroup perspective on gender differences in interpretations of four language variables: Ambiguous refusals, back-channels, questions, and problem disclosures.
LDR:02309nam 2200301 a 45 001 928463
005 20110426
008 110426s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493545727
035 $a (UnM)AAI3041228
035 $a AAI3041228
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Hallett, Jennifer Sue. $3 1251924
245 1 0 $a An intergroup perspective on gender differences in interpretations of four language variables: Ambiguous refusals, back-channels, questions, and problem disclosures.
300 $a 184 p.
500 $a Co-Chairs: James J. Bradac; Beth A. Le Poire.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-01, Section: A, page: 0025.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Barbara, 2002.
520 $a The current paper argues that subtle differences in how men and women use language can cause misunderstandings. Research results on communication and gender have primarily focused on differences in encoding behavior between men and women and have been complex and inconsistent (see Simpkins-Bullock & Wildman, 1991). One potential explanation for this inconsistency is that the intergroup perspective has not been widely used to frame gender differences. An intergroup perspective is useful to understand gender differences because it incorporates both intercultural (Maltz & Borker, 1982) and dominance (Henley & Kramarae, 1991) issues, the two major frameworks currently used in cross-gender studies. Specifically, social identity theory was used to explore gender differences in perceptions of verbal messages.
520 $a The current study exposed respondents to vignettes of the four language features, to determine whether respondents' gender, salience of gender, sex type, sex of speaker, or sex of conversational partner would influence whether respondents interpreted utterances as either agentic or communal. Speaker sex had some influence, but the context and content of the utterance primarily determined the meaning attributed to it.
590 $a School code: 0035.
650 4 $a Language, General. $3 1018089
650 4 $a Speech Communication. $3 1017408
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0679
710 2 0 $a University of California, Santa Barbara. $3 1017586
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-01A.
790 $a 0035
790 1 0 $a Bradac, James J., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Le Poire, Beth A., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3041228