東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Biogeochemical comparisons of two co...

Schilling, Erik Brian.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Biogeochemical comparisons of two contrasting riverine forests.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Biogeochemical comparisons of two contrasting riverine forests./
Author:	Schilling, Erik Brian.
Description:	167 p.
Notes:	Director: B. Graeme Lockaby.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-02B.
Subject:	Agriculture, Forestry and Wildlife. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3044026
ISBN:	0493577246

Biogeochemical comparisons of two contrasting riverine forests.
Schilling, Erik Brian.

Biogeochemical comparisons of two contrasting riverine forests. - 167 p.

Director: B. Graeme Lockaby.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Auburn University, 2002.

Biogeochemical comparisons were made between the Satilla River (SAT), a coastal plain blackwater river system, and the Altamaha River (ALT), a redwater river system of the Georgia Coastal Plain.

ISBN: 0493577246Subjects--Topical Terms:

783690
Agriculture, Forestry and Wildlife.

Biogeochemical comparisons of two contrasting riverine forests.
LDR:03316nam 2200349 a 45 001 928248
005 20110426
008 110426s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493577246
035 $a (UnM)AAI3044026
035 $a AAI3044026
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Schilling, Erik Brian. $3 1251711
245 1 0 $a Biogeochemical comparisons of two contrasting riverine forests.
300 $a 167 p.
500 $a Director: B. Graeme Lockaby.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-02, Section: B, page: 0703.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Auburn University, 2002.
520 $a Biogeochemical comparisons were made between the Satilla River (SAT), a coastal plain blackwater river system, and the Altamaha River (ALT), a redwater river system of the Georgia Coastal Plain.
520 $a In terms of N and P cycling, it is evident that the SAT site is more conservative with P cycling compared to N. By contrast, the ALT site appears to be slightly more conservative with N, and less conservative with P. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
520 $a Litterfall production within the SAT and ALT sites averaged 5,316 and 5,666 kg ha<super>−1</super> yr<super>−1</super>, respectively. Across both years, total aboveground net primary production (ANPP) for the SAT and ALT sites averaged 8,896 and 10,846 kg ha<super>−1</super>. Levels of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) returned via litterfall for the SAT site averaged 39.8 and 4.0 kg ha<super>−1</super> yr<super>−1 </super>, respectively, while the ALT site averaged 37 and 8.0 kg ha<super> −1</super> yr<super>−1</super>, respectively. The litterfall N/P ratios for the SAT site (9.7) were greater than those of the ALT site (6.01), indicating slight P and N deficiencies within the SAT and ALT sites, respectively. Nutrient resorption proficiencies indicate that the SAT species are highly proficient at resorbing both N and P, while the ALT species were only highly proficient at resorbing N.
520 $a Decomposition rates were slightly faster within the SAT microsites. After 525 days in the field, percent of the original mass remaining in mixed species litterbags ranged from 36 to 59% for both the SAT and ALT sites. Both sites showed strong N mineralization and P immobilization patterns at 525 days.
520 $a In terms of a growth response, seedlings of the SAT soil showed a response to all three fertilization regimes; however, seedlings of the N+P and P fertilization regimes showed the significantly greater seedling height growth compared to the unfertilized control. It appears that P, and not N, is most limiting NPP on the SAT soil.
520 $a Nutrient use efficiency (NUE) indices indicated that the ALT microsites were slightly more efficient with N. By contrast, the SAT microsites were more efficient at cycling P. It appears that the differences in ANPP within these systems are also related to amounts of Ca in litterfall, more so than the amounts of N and P in litterfall.
590 $a School code: 0012.
650 4 $a Agriculture, Forestry and Wildlife. $3 783690
650 4 $a Agriculture, Soil Science. $3 1017824
650 4 $a Biogeochemistry. $3 545717
690 $a 0425
690 $a 0478
690 $a 0481
710 2 0 $a Auburn University. $3 1020457
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-02B.
790 $a 0012
790 1 0 $a Lockaby, B. Graeme, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3044026