東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Vertical agreements and competition ...

Colino, Sandra Marco.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Vertical agreements and competition law : = a comparative study of the EU and US regimes /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Vertical agreements and competition law :/ Sandra Marco Colino.
Reminder of title:	a comparative study of the EU and US regimes /
Author:	Colino, Sandra Marco.
Published:	Oxford ;Hart, : 2010.,
Description:	xxii, 199 p. ;25 cm.
Notes:	Based on the author's thesis (doctoral)--European University Institute, 2007.
Subject:	Antitrust law - European Union countries. -
ISBN:	9781841138718 :

Vertical agreements and competition law : = a comparative study of the EU and US regimes /
Colino, Sandra Marco.

Vertical agreements and competition law :a comparative study of the EU and US regimes /Sandra Marco Colino. - Oxford ;Hart,2010. - xxii, 199 p. ;25 cm.

Based on the author's thesis (doctoral)--European University Institute, 2007.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

The enduring debate on the nature of vertical agreements --Introduction --

"This book focuses on the current legal framework for vertical agreements in the EU and the US. Over the last ten years, antitrust rules governing these agreements have undergone thorough reform. In the EU, the old sector-specific block exemptions were replaced by Regulation 2790/99, applicable to all sectors of the economy. In addition, changes introduced to the procedural rules have led to the decentralisation of Article 81(3) and the removal of the notification requirement. In like manner, in the US the Supreme Court has gradually taken vertical restraints out of the per se illegality rule. What Sylvania achieved in placing non-price vertical restraints under the rule of reason in the late 1970s, the Khan judgment did for maximum resale price maintenance in 1997, whilst most recently and most significantly in 2007 the Leegin case followed suit for minimum resale price maintenance."--BOOK JACKET.

ISBN: 9781841138718 :UK50.00Subjects--Topical Terms:

709868
Antitrust law
--European Union countries.

LC Class. No.: K3850 / .C65 2010

Dewey Class. No.: 343.240721

Vertical agreements and competition law : = a comparative study of the EU and US regimes /
LDR:02141cam 2200253 a 4500 001 896981
003 OCoLC
005 20101115175047.0
008 101115s2010 enk b 001 0 eng
020 $a 9781841138718 : $c UK50.00
020 $a 1841138711
035 $a (OCoLC)303096781 $z (OCoLC)503262374
035 $a PA99T10034
040 $a UKM $c UKM $d BTCTA $d YDXCP $d BWK $d YLS $d RCJ $d COO $d CDX $d PUL $d HEBIS $d UWO $d CLU $d NDHU
042 $a pcc
043 $a e------ $a n-us---
050 4 $a K3850 $b .C65 2010
082 0 4 $a 343.240721 $2 22
100 1 $a Colino, Sandra Marco. $3 1074431
245 1 0 $a Vertical agreements and competition law : $b a comparative study of the EU and US regimes / $c Sandra Marco Colino.
260 $a Oxford ; $a Portland, Or. : $c 2010. $b Hart,
300 $a xxii, 199 p. ; $c 25 cm.
500 $a Based on the author's thesis (doctoral)--European University Institute, 2007.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 0 $g Introduction -- $t The enduring debate on the nature of vertical agreements -- $t Theorising vertical restraints : the intellectual foundations of EC competition law and US antitrust models -- $t Questioning the achievement of an adequate economic analysis -- $t The impact of competition rules on vertical contractural relationships -- $g Conclusions.
520 1 $a "This book focuses on the current legal framework for vertical agreements in the EU and the US. Over the last ten years, antitrust rules governing these agreements have undergone thorough reform. In the EU, the old sector-specific block exemptions were replaced by Regulation 2790/99, applicable to all sectors of the economy. In addition, changes introduced to the procedural rules have led to the decentralisation of Article 81(3) and the removal of the notification requirement. In like manner, in the US the Supreme Court has gradually taken vertical restraints out of the per se illegality rule. What Sylvania achieved in placing non-price vertical restraints under the rule of reason in the late 1970s, the Khan judgment did for maximum resale price maintenance in 1997, whilst most recently and most significantly in 2007 the Leegin case followed suit for minimum resale price maintenance."--BOOK JACKET.
650 0 $a Antitrust law $z European Union countries. $3 709868
650 0 $a Antitrust law $z United States. $3 654909
650 0 $a Restraint of trade $z European Union countries. $3 709871
650 0 $a Restraint of trade $z United States. $3 682666