東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Wh-fronting in Chinese.

University of Southern California., Linguistics.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Wh-fronting in Chinese.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Wh-fronting in Chinese./
作者:	Cheung, Candice Chi-Hang.
面頁冊數:	330 p.
附註:	Adviser: Jean-Roger Vergnaud.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International69-09A.
標題:	Language, Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3325212
ISBN:	9780549788782

Wh-fronting in Chinese.
Cheung, Candice Chi-Hang.

Wh-fronting in Chinese. - 330 p.

Adviser: Jean-Roger Vergnaud.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Southern California, 2008.

This dissertation is a theoretical investigation of wh-fronting phenomena in Mandarin couched in the Principles-and-Parameters (P&P) framework, and its recent developments within the Minimalist Program. Specifically, two constructions involving wh-fronting are investigated, including preposed wh-questions, and the parasitic gap (PG) construction. Close examination of their distributional patterns, interpretive, and syntactic properties reveals that they are best-analyzed as a type of contrastive focus construction, refuting the prevalent view that wh-fronting should be treated as an instance of "wh-topicalization" with the pre-clausal wh-phrase either base-generated or moved to SPEC-Top (Xu & Langendoen 1985, Tang 1988, Li 1996, Wu 1999, Kuong 2006, Pan 2006, inter alia). Such a proposal is further supported by the distinctive morphological, syntactic, and semantic properties of topics and contrastive foci in the language. A desirable consequence of this proposal is that wh-fronting in Mandarin need not be viewed as a language-specific phenomenon nor should its coexistence with in-situ wh-questions be surprising, since the coexistence of contrastive focus constructions, such as clefted questions, and simple wh-questions, is very common crosslinguistically (Kiss 1998).

ISBN: 9780549788782Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018079
Language, Linguistics.

Wh-fronting in Chinese.
LDR:03336nmm 2200277 a 45 001 868855
005 20100812
008 100812s2008 eng d
020 $a 9780549788782
035 $a (UMI)AAI3325212
035 $a AAI3325212
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Cheung, Candice Chi-Hang. $3 1038010
245 1 0 $a Wh-fronting in Chinese.
300 $a 330 p.
500 $a Adviser: Jean-Roger Vergnaud.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-09, Section: A, page: 3524.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Southern California, 2008.
520 $a This dissertation is a theoretical investigation of wh-fronting phenomena in Mandarin couched in the Principles-and-Parameters (P&P) framework, and its recent developments within the Minimalist Program. Specifically, two constructions involving wh-fronting are investigated, including preposed wh-questions, and the parasitic gap (PG) construction. Close examination of their distributional patterns, interpretive, and syntactic properties reveals that they are best-analyzed as a type of contrastive focus construction, refuting the prevalent view that wh-fronting should be treated as an instance of "wh-topicalization" with the pre-clausal wh-phrase either base-generated or moved to SPEC-Top (Xu & Langendoen 1985, Tang 1988, Li 1996, Wu 1999, Kuong 2006, Pan 2006, inter alia). Such a proposal is further supported by the distinctive morphological, syntactic, and semantic properties of topics and contrastive foci in the language. A desirable consequence of this proposal is that wh-fronting in Mandarin need not be viewed as a language-specific phenomenon nor should its coexistence with in-situ wh-questions be surprising, since the coexistence of contrastive focus constructions, such as clefted questions, and simple wh-questions, is very common crosslinguistically (Kiss 1998).
520 $a With respect to the syntax of wh-fronting, a specific question addressed in this dissertation is whether overt movement obligatorily applies to the wh-phrase bearing contrastive focus in Mandarin. Two different approaches have been proposed for it-clefts in English: the null operator movement and overt movement analyses advanced by Chomsky (1977) (see also Kiss 1998). It is argued that both strategies are independently motivated to accommodate the fact that wh-arguments in preposed wh-questions may undergo movement or employ operator movement, depending on the availability of an intrusive pronoun. Additionally, it proposes that PP wh-phrases and the wh-adverbial weishenme 'why' uniformly undergo overt movement to SPEC-Foc in preposed wh-questions. A typology of contrastive focus constructions is advanced accordingly, advocating that overt movement and null operator movement should be licensing mechanisms available to contrastive focus constructions in Universal Grammar (UG). The typology put forth in this dissertation also gains support from the PG construction, which crucially relies on overt movement to derive the licensing gap, and null operator movement to derive the parasitic gap.
590 $a School code: 0208.
650 4 $a Language, Linguistics. $3 1018079
690 $a 0290
710 2 0 $a University of Southern California. $b Linguistics. $3 1037961
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 69-09A.
790 $a 0208
790 1 0 $a Vergnaud, Jean-Roger, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2008
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3325212