東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Students' sources of teacher informa...

California State University, Long Beach.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Students' sources of teacher information: The effect of face-to-face and computer-mediated communication on student course selection and affect toward teacher.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Students' sources of teacher information: The effect of face-to-face and computer-mediated communication on student course selection and affect toward teacher./
Author:	Liang, Yuhua.
Description:	85 p.
Notes:	Adviser: Mary McPherson.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International46-06.
Subject:	Education, Educational Psychology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1455472
ISBN:	9780549594628

Students' sources of teacher information: The effect of face-to-face and computer-mediated communication on student course selection and affect toward teacher.
Liang, Yuhua.

Students' sources of teacher information: The effect of face-to-face and computer-mediated communication on student course selection and affect toward teacher. - 85 p.

Adviser: Mary McPherson.

Thesis (M.A.)--California State University, Long Beach, 2008.

In an attempt to find out information about prospective teachers, students use different media to share their opinions and experiences. Yet little is known about the media choices students use to obtain teacher information. Drawing upon media richness theory as a theoretical framework, this study compared the impact of 2 media (face-to-face communication and computer-mediated communication) and message valence on students' course choices and perceptions of the teacher. Two studies were employed to test the hypotheses. In Study 1, artificial scenarios were created to assess the effects of communication media and message valence. In Study 2, a recall prompt was utilized. The results of the studies indicate that the media did not contribute to differences in student enrollment decisions or affect toward teacher. Message valence, however, significantly altered students' likelihood of taking a course and affect toward teacher. Implications of these results and limitations of this study are discussed.

ISBN: 9780549594628Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017560
Education, Educational Psychology.

Students' sources of teacher information: The effect of face-to-face and computer-mediated communication on student course selection and affect toward teacher.
LDR:01983nmm 2200289 a 45 001 863997
005 20100726
008 100726s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549594628
035 $a (UMI)AAI1455472
035 $a AAI1455472
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Liang, Yuhua. $3 1032096
245 1 0 $a Students' sources of teacher information: The effect of face-to-face and computer-mediated communication on student course selection and affect toward teacher.
300 $a 85 p.
500 $a Adviser: Mary McPherson.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 46-06, page: 2935.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--California State University, Long Beach, 2008.
520 $a In an attempt to find out information about prospective teachers, students use different media to share their opinions and experiences. Yet little is known about the media choices students use to obtain teacher information. Drawing upon media richness theory as a theoretical framework, this study compared the impact of 2 media (face-to-face communication and computer-mediated communication) and message valence on students' course choices and perceptions of the teacher. Two studies were employed to test the hypotheses. In Study 1, artificial scenarios were created to assess the effects of communication media and message valence. In Study 2, a recall prompt was utilized. The results of the studies indicate that the media did not contribute to differences in student enrollment decisions or affect toward teacher. Message valence, however, significantly altered students' likelihood of taking a course and affect toward teacher. Implications of these results and limitations of this study are discussed.
590 $a School code: 6080.
650 4 $a Education, Educational Psychology. $3 1017560
650 4 $a Education, Technology of. $3 1018012
650 4 $a Speech Communication. $3 1017408
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0710
710 2 $a California State University, Long Beach. $3 1017843
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 46-06.
790 $a 6080
790 1 0 $a McPherson, Mary, $e advisor
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2008
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1455472