東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Self-efficacy, state anxiety, and mo...

The Florida State University.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Self-efficacy, state anxiety, and motivation during mandatory combatives training.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Self-efficacy, state anxiety, and motivation during mandatory combatives training./
Author:	Morales-Negron, Hector R.
Description:	142 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-07, Section: A, page: 2648.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International69-07A.
Subject:	Education, Educational Psychology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3321508
ISBN:	9780549730750

Self-efficacy, state anxiety, and motivation during mandatory combatives training.
Morales-Negron, Hector R.

Self-efficacy, state anxiety, and motivation during mandatory combatives training. - 142 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-07, Section: A, page: 2648.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2008.

A new Army-wide combatives program was made mandatory in 2004 to provide soldiers with the physical and psychological demands of hand-to-hand fighting prior to engaging in combat. This study was conducted to evaluate key psychological variables highlighted in the Chief of Staff of the Army's memorandum that imposed the combatives program. U.S. Army soldiers (n = 52) attending three different instructor combatives training courses at two military installations in the U.S. were evaluated. Measurements were obtained on self-defense efficacy (SDE), teaching combatives self-efficacy (TCSE), combatives state anxiety (CSA), and motivation. In a quasi-experimental design, were one class was designated as the control, and the second and third as interventions, a cognitive-behavioral coping intervention targeting combatives anxiety was evaluated. Two of the courses (n = 32) served as the intervention and the other class as a control group (n = 20). Split Plot ANOVAs revealed a significant increase in SDE and TCSE across the course for both groups. Descriptively, the intervention group scored lower in CSA and higher in motivation than the control group as the course progressed. Lastly, individuals ordered to attend training scored lower in SDE, TCSE, and higher in state anxiety than those who volunteered for the training. However, individuals on the intervention group that were ordered to attend scored descriptively higher in TCSE and motivation, and lower in CSA than those in the control group that were ordered to attend. These results provide preliminary evidence that a combatives anxiety coping strategy intervention may have utility for positively influencing self-defense efficacy, combatives state anxiety, and motivation during mandatory combatives training.

ISBN: 9780549730750Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017560
Education, Educational Psychology.

Self-efficacy, state anxiety, and motivation during mandatory combatives training.
LDR:02609nam 2200265 a 45 001 856520
005 20100709
008 100709s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549730750
035 $a (UMI)AAI3321508
035 $a AAI3321508
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Morales-Negron, Hector R. $3 1023335
245 1 0 $a Self-efficacy, state anxiety, and motivation during mandatory combatives training.
300 $a 142 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-07, Section: A, page: 2648.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2008.
520 $a A new Army-wide combatives program was made mandatory in 2004 to provide soldiers with the physical and psychological demands of hand-to-hand fighting prior to engaging in combat. This study was conducted to evaluate key psychological variables highlighted in the Chief of Staff of the Army's memorandum that imposed the combatives program. U.S. Army soldiers (n = 52) attending three different instructor combatives training courses at two military installations in the U.S. were evaluated. Measurements were obtained on self-defense efficacy (SDE), teaching combatives self-efficacy (TCSE), combatives state anxiety (CSA), and motivation. In a quasi-experimental design, were one class was designated as the control, and the second and third as interventions, a cognitive-behavioral coping intervention targeting combatives anxiety was evaluated. Two of the courses (n = 32) served as the intervention and the other class as a control group (n = 20). Split Plot ANOVAs revealed a significant increase in SDE and TCSE across the course for both groups. Descriptively, the intervention group scored lower in CSA and higher in motivation than the control group as the course progressed. Lastly, individuals ordered to attend training scored lower in SDE, TCSE, and higher in state anxiety than those who volunteered for the training. However, individuals on the intervention group that were ordered to attend scored descriptively higher in TCSE and motivation, and lower in CSA than those in the control group that were ordered to attend. These results provide preliminary evidence that a combatives anxiety coping strategy intervention may have utility for positively influencing self-defense efficacy, combatives state anxiety, and motivation during mandatory combatives training.
590 $a School code: 0071.
650 4 $a Education, Educational Psychology. $3 1017560
650 4 $a Education, Physical. $3 1018000
650 4 $a Military Studies. $3 1017606
690 $a 0523
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0750
710 2 $a The Florida State University. $3 1017727
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 69-07A.
790 $a 0071
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2008
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3321508