東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Collaboration and gender communicati...

Purdue University.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Collaboration and gender communication traits: The negotiation of authority in a composition class.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Collaboration and gender communication traits: The negotiation of authority in a composition class./
Author:	Baker, Lori Beth.
Description:	231 p.
Notes:	Major Professor: Janice M. Lauer.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International62-06A.
Subject:	Education, Language and Literature. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3017570
ISBN:	9780493278711

Collaboration and gender communication traits: The negotiation of authority in a composition class.
Baker, Lori Beth.

Collaboration and gender communication traits: The negotiation of authority in a composition class. - 231 p.

Major Professor: Janice M. Lauer.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Purdue University, 1999.

This dissertation studies two types of authority in collaboration---sociocultural authority and writing authority---in two contexts, the pedagogical and rhetorical approaches being forwarded by a writing instructor. Each framework implicates different roles and emphases of the students' and teacher's sociocultural and writing authority. A case study examined gender communication traits in the interactions between three members of a peer group and their instructor throughout a semester of a first year composition course. Collaboration on individual work was studied through the first four paper cycles, and shared-document collaboration was studied during the final paper. Each participant's traits of connection (feminine) and status (masculine) were noted in both spoken and written collaboration throughout the writing process. The female instructor used more connection traits than status ones during collaborative time, but her total traits declined across each paper cycle as she attempted to increase the students' senses of writing authority while decreasing her own sociocultural authority as teacher. The female instructor and female student tended to use more masculine traits of status in their written feedback to the male group members. The two male students displayed more feminine traits during the spoken collaboration than masculine ones, downplaying traditional displays of sociocultural authority attributed to males. The male student for whom English was a second language asked more questions (a feminine trait) than any one else.

ISBN: 9780493278711Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018115
Education, Language and Literature.

Collaboration and gender communication traits: The negotiation of authority in a composition class.
LDR:02507nam 2200301 a 45 001 855526
005 20100708
008 100708s1999 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780493278711
035 $a (UMI)AAI3017570
035 $a AAI3017570
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Baker, Lori Beth. $3 1022159
245 1 0 $a Collaboration and gender communication traits: The negotiation of authority in a composition class.
300 $a 231 p.
500 $a Major Professor: Janice M. Lauer.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-06, Section: A, page: 2096.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Purdue University, 1999.
520 $a This dissertation studies two types of authority in collaboration---sociocultural authority and writing authority---in two contexts, the pedagogical and rhetorical approaches being forwarded by a writing instructor. Each framework implicates different roles and emphases of the students' and teacher's sociocultural and writing authority. A case study examined gender communication traits in the interactions between three members of a peer group and their instructor throughout a semester of a first year composition course. Collaboration on individual work was studied through the first four paper cycles, and shared-document collaboration was studied during the final paper. Each participant's traits of connection (feminine) and status (masculine) were noted in both spoken and written collaboration throughout the writing process. The female instructor used more connection traits than status ones during collaborative time, but her total traits declined across each paper cycle as she attempted to increase the students' senses of writing authority while decreasing her own sociocultural authority as teacher. The female instructor and female student tended to use more masculine traits of status in their written feedback to the male group members. The two male students displayed more feminine traits during the spoken collaboration than masculine ones, downplaying traditional displays of sociocultural authority attributed to males. The male student for whom English was a second language asked more questions (a feminine trait) than any one else.
590 $a School code: 0183.
650 4 $a Education, Language and Literature. $3 1018115
650 4 $a Education, Sociology of. $3 626654
650 4 $a Language, Rhetoric and Composition. $3 1019205
650 4 $a Speech Communication. $3 1017408
690 $a 0279
690 $a 0340
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0681
710 2 $a Purdue University. $3 1017663
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 62-06A.
790 $a 0183
790 1 0 $a Lauer, Janice M., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1999
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3017570