東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Blended learning and the classroom e...

The George Washington University., Higher Education Administration.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Blended learning and the classroom environment: A comparative analysis of students' perception of the classroom environment across community college courses taught in traditional face-to-face, online and blended methods.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Blended learning and the classroom environment: A comparative analysis of students' perception of the classroom environment across community college courses taught in traditional face-to-face, online and blended methods./
作者:	Comey, William L.
面頁冊數:	165 p.
附註:	Adviser: Michael D. Corry.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International70-02A.
標題:	Education, Community College. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3344753
ISBN:	9781109039481

Blended learning and the classroom environment: A comparative analysis of students' perception of the classroom environment across community college courses taught in traditional face-to-face, online and blended methods.
Comey, William L.

Blended learning and the classroom environment: A comparative analysis of students' perception of the classroom environment across community college courses taught in traditional face-to-face, online and blended methods. - 165 p.

Adviser: Michael D. Corry.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--The George Washington University, 2009.

This study examined how students' perception of the classroom environment differs across traditional face-to-face, online, and blended courses. The study compared feedback from students enrolled in courses taught in each format to determine if the blended learning environment produces higher levels of participation (Cathectic Learning Climate/CLC), a stronger sense of connection to the instructor (Professorial Concern/PC), a more positive feeling about the cooperative nature of the classroom environment (Inimical Ambiance/IA), a stronger perception that the course is intellectually challenging (Academic Rigor/AR), a better feeling that the instructor is supportive and student-centered (Affiliation/AF), and a more positive sense that the evaluation criteria and course content have been clearly articulated (Structure/ST).

ISBN: 9781109039481Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018008
Education, Community College.

Blended learning and the classroom environment: A comparative analysis of students' perception of the classroom environment across community college courses taught in traditional face-to-face, online and blended methods.
LDR:03642nam 2200361 a 45 001 854388
005 20100702
008 100702s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109039481
035 $a (UMI)AAI3344753
035 $a AAI3344753
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Comey, William L. $3 1020746
245 1 0 $a Blended learning and the classroom environment: A comparative analysis of students' perception of the classroom environment across community college courses taught in traditional face-to-face, online and blended methods.
300 $a 165 p.
500 $a Adviser: Michael D. Corry.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-02, Section: A, page: 0490.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--The George Washington University, 2009.
520 $a This study examined how students' perception of the classroom environment differs across traditional face-to-face, online, and blended courses. The study compared feedback from students enrolled in courses taught in each format to determine if the blended learning environment produces higher levels of participation (Cathectic Learning Climate/CLC), a stronger sense of connection to the instructor (Professorial Concern/PC), a more positive feeling about the cooperative nature of the classroom environment (Inimical Ambiance/IA), a stronger perception that the course is intellectually challenging (Academic Rigor/AR), a better feeling that the instructor is supportive and student-centered (Affiliation/AF), and a more positive sense that the evaluation criteria and course content have been clearly articulated (Structure/ST).
520 $a The College Classroom Environment Scales (CCES) were used to gather information about students' perceptions of the classroom environment (Winston, Vahala, Nichols, & Gillis, 1989). Study participants consisted of 368 students enrolled in courses taught at a community college. A stratified random sample was taken during the Fall 2007 semester. Descriptive statistics, MANOVA, univariate ANOVAs and Games-Howell planned comparison tests were used in the analysis. The analysis revealed significant differences on all six dependent variables.
520 $a The findings suggest that blended classes provide an atmosphere that is as good as or better than both face-to-face and online classes in producing higher levels of student participation (CLC) and a stronger sense of being connected to the instructor (PC). That both face-to-face and blended students perceive that their instructor is more supportive and student-centered (AF) and have more positive feelings about the cooperative nature of the classroom environment (IA) than do online students. But, classes taught online seem to foster a stronger perception that the course is intellectually challenging (AR) and that the evaluation criteria and course content have been clearly articulated (ST) than both face-to-face and blended classes.
520 $a Overall, the results seem to suggest that by combining elements of both face-to-face and online courses, blended courses can create a positive learning environment while providing some of the convenience of an online course without eliminating the face-to-face contact that many students desire.
590 $a School code: 0075.
650 4 $a Education, Community College. $3 1018008
650 4 $a Education, Curriculum and Instruction. $3 576301
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Education, Technology of. $3 1018012
690 $a 0275
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a The George Washington University. $b Higher Education Administration. $3 1020745
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 70-02A.
790 $a 0075
790 1 0 $a Brown, Walter A. $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Corry, Michael D., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Graham, Carolyn W. $e committee member
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2009
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3344753