東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Impact of Text-Based Synchronous...

Zhang, Xiaomeng,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Impact of Text-Based Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication and Face-to-Face Oral Communication on L2 Chinese Speaking Performance /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Impact of Text-Based Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication and Face-to-Face Oral Communication on L2 Chinese Speaking Performance // Xiaomeng Zhang.
作者:	Zhang, Xiaomeng,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (244 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-02B.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31482129
ISBN:	9798383606629

The Impact of Text-Based Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication and Face-to-Face Oral Communication on L2 Chinese Speaking Performance /
Zhang, Xiaomeng,

The Impact of Text-Based Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication and Face-to-Face Oral Communication on L2 Chinese Speaking Performance /Xiaomeng Zhang. - 1 electronic resource (244 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: B.

Guided by both the interactionist and sociocultural learning theories, this study investigates the interactive communications in text-based synchronous computer-mediated communication (SCMC) and face-to-face (FTF) oral communication environments and the impacts they bring to subsequent L2 Chinese speaking. Learners' perspectives on using text-based SCMC and FTF conversations to prepare for oral presentations are also examined. Through quantitative and qualitative analysis and case study analysis, the current study revealed both similarities and differences between the two interactive learning environments and their impacts on subsequent speaking performance. From the interactionist learning perspective, both learning environments provided opportunities for learners to generate comprehensive input and output and engage in negotiation of meaning. The linguistic and ideational resources discussed in the two interactive environments served as good preparations for learners' subsequent individual speaking. However, FTF communications generated significantly more language output, number of turns, and language-related episodes (LREs) and showed significantly higher content richness than text-based SCMC, whereas text-based SCMC showed significantly higher syntactic complexity. Post-FTF speaking performance demonstrated significantly better fluency, more diverse and advanced lexical usages, and richer content, whereas post-SCMC speaking performance was syntactically more accurate, had more complex syntactic features, and received higher holistic ratings. Examining from the sociocultural learning perspective, while both learning environments allowed learners to collaborate and contribute to the co-construction of language and ideas, the two modes differed in the degree of equality in learners' participation and the extent to which learners performed languaging and peer scaffolding. The results showed that language contribution in text-based SCMC was more evenly distributed than in FTF conversations, suggesting a more equal learner participation. Moreover, although learners engaged in more LREs during FTF conversations, they did not necessarily transfer the discussed language forms to their speaking afterward. While both learning environments were perceived to be facilitative in helping learners prepare for individual speaking in L2 Chinese, learners perceived FTF communications as more efficient in eliciting peer scaffolding due to immediate clarification and feedback. The case study revealed that the two interactive learning environments exhibited differences in their affordances depending on learners' learning approaches and L2 speaking proficiency.

English

ISBN: 9798383606629Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Face-to-face oral communication

The Impact of Text-Based Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication and Face-to-Face Oral Communication on L2 Chinese Speaking Performance /
LDR:04294nmm a22004693i 4500 001 2438979
005 20260727141647.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798383606629
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31482129
035 $a AAI31482129
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Zhang, Xiaomeng, $e author. $3 3830442
245 1 0 $a The Impact of Text-Based Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication and Face-to-Face Oral Communication on L2 Chinese Speaking Performance / $c Xiaomeng Zhang.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (244 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: B.
500 $a Advisors: Liao, Jianling Committee members: Oh, Young; Šipka, Danko; Smith, Bryan.
502 $b Ph.D. $c Arizona State University $d 2024.
520 $a Guided by both the interactionist and sociocultural learning theories, this study investigates the interactive communications in text-based synchronous computer-mediated communication (SCMC) and face-to-face (FTF) oral communication environments and the impacts they bring to subsequent L2 Chinese speaking. Learners' perspectives on using text-based SCMC and FTF conversations to prepare for oral presentations are also examined. Through quantitative and qualitative analysis and case study analysis, the current study revealed both similarities and differences between the two interactive learning environments and their impacts on subsequent speaking performance. From the interactionist learning perspective, both learning environments provided opportunities for learners to generate comprehensive input and output and engage in negotiation of meaning. The linguistic and ideational resources discussed in the two interactive environments served as good preparations for learners' subsequent individual speaking. However, FTF communications generated significantly more language output, number of turns, and language-related episodes (LREs) and showed significantly higher content richness than text-based SCMC, whereas text-based SCMC showed significantly higher syntactic complexity. Post-FTF speaking performance demonstrated significantly better fluency, more diverse and advanced lexical usages, and richer content, whereas post-SCMC speaking performance was syntactically more accurate, had more complex syntactic features, and received higher holistic ratings. Examining from the sociocultural learning perspective, while both learning environments allowed learners to collaborate and contribute to the co-construction of language and ideas, the two modes differed in the degree of equality in learners' participation and the extent to which learners performed languaging and peer scaffolding. The results showed that language contribution in text-based SCMC was more evenly distributed than in FTF conversations, suggesting a more equal learner participation. Moreover, although learners engaged in more LREs during FTF conversations, they did not necessarily transfer the discussed language forms to their speaking afterward. While both learning environments were perceived to be facilitative in helping learners prepare for individual speaking in L2 Chinese, learners perceived FTF communications as more efficient in eliciting peer scaffolding due to immediate clarification and feedback. The case study revealed that the two interactive learning environments exhibited differences in their affordances depending on learners' learning approaches and L2 speaking proficiency.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0010
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Foreign language instruction. $3 3541319
650 4 $a Computer science. $3 523869
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
653 $a Face-to-face oral communication
653 $a L2 Chinese speaking
653 $a Language transfer
653 $a Peer collaboration
653 $a Peer interactions
653 $a Language-related episodes
690 $a 0444
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0984
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0459
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b East Asian Languages and Civilizations. $e degree granting institution. $3 3830443
720 1 $a Liao, Jianling $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-02B.
790 $a 0010
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31482129